Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

ror24 and MT collect


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4470 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Had experience with these over the lasy few months also. Took out a £150 loan at end of October, had circa £360 debited from my account at the end of January and now Mitigate Trace and Collect are demanding just over £600 from a letter received today! That's nearly a grand for £150 loan from 4 months ago.

Have complained to CFO but no response whatsoever apart from the usual we're busy so we'll get back to you in 24 hours - that was almost 2 weeks ago. Have passed on all details to OFT today and putting a letter together to FOS also.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they fail to answer your email then fill out this (but edit it to suit) and forward it to the Office Of Fair Trading the British Cheque Cashing Association and the Financial Ombudsman Service (the FOS will charge them £500 to investigate your complaint) - Make sure you edit this though....

 

Your address

Date

 

Dear Sirs

 

On (date) I took out a loan with (xxxxxxx) unfortunately due to my circumstances, I was unable to repay the amount as per my agreement.

 

(delete as appropriate)

 

I have attempted to make contact with the company to organise a repayment planlink3.gif but they have simply told me they will not negotiate.

 

I have received threatening texts/abusive emails/abusive telephone callslink3.gif to my employer and/or place of work despite my requests for these to stop.

 

I have had my new/current account raided by this company despite me not informing them of my new bank account.

 

The company took an unauthrised payment out of my bank account whcih was significantly over and above the amount on their agreement.

 

The company concerned have not given me any kind of breakdown of how the charges/interestlink3.gif have been calculated.

 

The company have completely ignored my complaints.

 

I wish to make this a formal complaint, and realise that you do not investigate individual complaints, however if you do require any further information I would be more than happy to assist the Office Of Fair Trading/BCCA/Financial Ombudsmanlink3.gif Service in their enquiries.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

Then send it to these email addresses

 

If they refuse to get into dialogue or ignore your emails to offer a repayment planlink3.gif, then it is quite evident that this is a breach of the OFT's guidelines

 

Send this to the OFT (by email) to [email protected]

 

Also email it to the BCCA - [email protected]

Also open up a case number with the foslink3.gif - [email protected]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had email from CFO tonight contradicting outstanding balance as quoted by MT Collect. Would seem one side of the office doesn't talk to the other! CFO still state £117 outstanding whilst MTC quote £622!

Have disputed charges and lodged complaints with BCCA, OFT and FOS and contemplating small claims for charges taken in unauthorised payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...