Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Acenden and me


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4492 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We had a reposession order slapped on us by these pariahs when my husband became mentally ill and I had to cease work to become his full time carer which gave us substantial money problems in September 2009.Long story short, we struggled to make the both the mortgage payment and the extra £50 a month that Arsenden demanded. It seemed every month they were sending letters to say our mortgage payments were going up in line with Libor. In August 2011 we decided to try and sell the property and move into rented accomadation, first of all falling victim to National Homebuyers who demanded £500 up front before they would even speak to us. They made a ridiculous offer but it would just have cleared the mortgage so we decided to go ahead to get Arsenden off our back.

 

A little while later National Homebuyers chopped £15000.00 off the offer, which needless to say what answer they were given. Hence we didnt get the £500 back. We did however manage to find a private buyer, whom, whilst not offering full market value made a respectable offer which we accepted on 10th November 2011. I contacted my solicitor on the 18th January 2012 as from the initial scurry of activity in November we had heard nothing since November. He informed me that he sent papers to buyers solicitor on 25th November and had not recieved them back until 15th January, they were asking me to take out a policy to safeguard against any FUTURE land contamination !!!!!!!!! Needless to say the answer was no as there had been no issues with land contamination and the guy that was buying the house is a buy to let landlord who owns several properties in my street. We went to check the property after the high winds on the 21st of January and found a eviction notice from Arsenden scheduled for the 25th January. When I contacted them to try and sort the matter out it was a case of pay up or else. We decided to go to court and try to postpone the eviction as the sale of the property was imminent. We managed to get a postponement until the 16th February to allow the sale to proceed.

 

The judge gave us 21 days from the 25th or the next available court date. We were then more or less physically dragged into the county court office to reschedule another eviction date. The Bailiff did not have a free slot for the 17th which technically was the 21st day of the Judges order so Arsendens solicitor asked for the day before, hence not abiding by the judges decision. A freind of mine offered to pay the arrears off on his credit card so they would get off our back and the sale go through, but they didnt want to know as it was a credit card. My solicitor who was acting for us in the sale of our house was given my authorisation to deal with Arsenden and try and get them to back off. I spent one hour and 8 minutes on the phone to them at a cost of £15.78 as I only have a mobile and was told what they required my solicitor to send them to consider before they would back off.

 

My solicitor sent the necessary paperwork at 9am on the 16th February and at 10.30am I got Lissal [EDIT - PLEASE REFRAIN FROM PERSONAL ABUSE] of Arsenden on the phone asking why they had not got the apaperwork as requested. I told her they had and it had been sent to the fax number I was given. She denied all knowledge and said I was supposed to phone them to tell them the fax had been sent at 9am. I was not told to ring or I would have told them that i could not due to having no credit and she said I was lying as she had Matthew sat across from her and it was he who had told me that. Personally I couldnt have cared less if he was sat on her knee. I know what he told me as I wrote everything down I had to tell my solicitor and read it back to Matthew as I wanted to make sure I did everything right given the reposession was less than 12 hours away. She seemed to get some sort of kick in saying :

 

Well the eviction is going ahead at 11.30 unless you sell your house within the next 30 minutes. The actual time for eviction was 11.40 so not only were they going in a day early they wanted to go in a extra 10 minutes early. My solicitor rang me at 11.30 to say the eviction had been postponed to the following Tuesday. The house sale went through the next day on the 17th. My solicitor sent Arsenden £60193.54, as the mortgage stood at £56900.00 I think this amount was well over the top. My solicitors bill doubled to £1211.56 from £560.00 initially, the buyer got the keys and the minimal proceeds due to come to us is still with my solicitor as he had to give a undertaking to Arsenden to cover any shortfall?????????????? I contacted Arsenden and was given the old run around both by them and TLT solicitors, neither of which would tell me what the correct settlement figure was or what TLT costs had been.

 

All they had to do is reply to my solicitor to say payment was made in full. They said this would take approximately 4 weeks and I told them it bloody well wouldnt, from that I waS AGAIN PASSED ROUND and ended up back at Customer Services where I had started. A woman called Hannah said she would pass it to a senior as urgent and it would take 24 hours. That was the 24th February and still nothing has been sent. I complained using there online complaint form on the 24th and surprise surprise no response. I have just rang my solicitor and told him my money had better hit my account by tomorrow and Arsenden can do one. I am considering a course of action involving Trading Standards, The Solicitors Regulation Authority and the FSO. wHAT DO YOU SUGGEST ?????????????

Edited by Ell-enn
Broken down into paragraphs so it's easier to read.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have moved your post to a seprate thread. The first thing I would be doing is sending a SAR to them so you get a breakdown of all charges and other information.....any PPI on this at all ? And I would certainly inform the FSA and the Office Of Fair Trading too..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...