Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Santander downgraded my account! For going overdrawn


CityDude
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4509 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

Here is the story I was wondering if you guys could help me?

 

I recently opened a new account with Santander around a month ago.

 

I made a purchase 3 weeks ago online 2 purchases, 1 for 700 euros 1 for 400 euros.

I had around 2,100GBP in my account, other payments was also made.

 

Went into the 02 shop bought a Iphone the was around 459 that I purchased my balance after this was around 763GBP.

 

That took me overdrawn a few days later, as 2 payments went out of the account 3 weeks later it took me overdrawn for around 200GBP how ever I paid this within 24 hours, yet today they said that they are downgrading my account from a normal VISA account to a cash card account.

Fully explained the issue to the bank they won't listen!

 

Its not my fault they took 3 weeks to process payments, i was also waiting for payments from someone else to come into my account they ended up getting backdated.

 

Are they even allowed to do this? I'm 17 currently.

 

This was the banks fault, I manage my money very good and I paid the money quite fast they won't even help me :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most banks do the same until you have a long period of responsible banking with them.

 

Hello,

 

I understand that.

 

How ever I paid it back 24 hours later, also gave them a full explanation of why it happened.

I had my LLoyds account for 2 years only went overdrawn twice in 2 years of having the account over the same thing.

 

I can make a lot of large payments online and then when they hang and do not come out it messes up the amount how ever they would not listen or even reconsider the decision.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who can tell why they do this. I will take a good guess though. You are more likely to fall into the penalty charges trap with the account you have now than the other one.

 

Why do banks think 'they are in charge'. All this compulsory paying wages into banks is wrong and you should be able to give your choice to an employer as to if you want your wages banked or in cash, you have a right to have it in cash.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello

 

banks do that - simple reasons

1) u are under age, if u get bank charges, no one can claim them from you legally

 

2) just wondering ur card might have been blocked for starters saying for security reasons when we suspect unusual activity our fraud system blocks th card temporarily - LOL, oh here's ur second reason, u r 17 spending that kind of money, did ur salary went ( or any other credit source) was credited in the account during that period, i guess no, you are a potential fraudtser to them (sorry to say but thts a fact) m just assuming this as a reason as there are not much details in ur query and ur account is fairly new

 

3) reason, u paid Overdraft in 24 hrs - how did u get the moeny to pay it off ( in reality may be ur parents gave it to u but bank dsnt considers that at all)

 

ur options, wait relax, be 18 and get teh account upgraded again, wait and have ur salary paid in ur account or any other reliable source of credit for couple of months, i gaurantee u sales team will contact u for an upgrade, last option there are so many other banks who want money :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

After 2 weeks of trying to reason with the bank.

 

I went into the branch asked the branch about it, they phoned up the collections department who originally put the block on the card, and told the bank to remove my debit facility.

 

How ever they told me I could appeal it, so I asked them to appeal it, took 48 hours, today they have ordered me a new card with a debit/visa facility on it.

 

Does this mean that they made a mistake? since the management of the company overturned it?

Edited by CityDude
Link to post
Share on other sites

did you presented ur id like a passport or drivers licence in brnach for identification before the brnach called th collections (collections dun put the block on account/card, its a diff dept n i m assuming that the branch person spoke to them after getting diveretd by collections)

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you presented ur id like a passport or drivers licence in brnach for identification before the brnach called th collections (collections dun put the block on account/card, its a diff dept n i m assuming that the branch person spoke to them after getting diveretd by collections)

 

How the hell would that have anything to do with the issue I was facing?

 

They confirm your details when ringing up they downgraded my account because I went overdrawn not a security issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...