Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

O2 broadband router "debt" - to pay or not to pay


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4535 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, First of all congratulations on your fantastic forum and thank you for all the friendly and knowledgable advice I've already read on here. I wonder if I could get your input on this rather strange case...

 

About two years ago I opened a broadband account with O2, but then I moved house in January of last year, and as the new flat came with broadband preinstalled, I cancelled my account with O2. When I called them up to cancel the account I agreed with their customer service agent that they would send me a pre-paid return envelope to my new address so I could send them back the broadband router that came with the account. As I hadn't received the envelope a couple of weeks later I gave them another call around March time, to again request the return envelope and again confirm my new address. Again I did not get anything from them and I eventually forgot all about it because, frankly, I've got better things to do with my time than chasing them to do their job.

 

Fast forward to November this year when I received a letter from Fredrickson asking to get in touch with them. I ignored that one (after reading on here that this would be the best way forward - best advice ever). So far so good, but then I received another letter yesterday, naming O2 as their client, for a debt of £50. It does have the phone number of my old flat on it, so I suppose it really relates to me in some way (although for all I know it could be the people who lived there before or after me, as I did not take the phone number with me). They threaten they will add £70 to the debt if I don't pay in 7 days (can they do that, actually?)

 

Anyway, ok, it's "only" 50 quid (although that's frankly a lot of money for me at the moment). But it really annoys me that O2 would have decided to go down that route. They had ample opportunity to contact me at my new address, my email address, or even on my mobile number, and they even had an open direct debit from me until recently, they could have just taken the money out of my account.

 

Now my question is, do you think it would make sense to call O2 and see what they have say? Would they actually be able to still get Freds off my case? I still have that sodding router gathering dust sitting in my wardrobe, so they can have that back if they want.

 

Would it make sense to start a fight with Freds? I don't want them to add those £70, so there's that. But at the same time I'd rather they didn't get anything from me, because it really isn't my fault those £50 were still outstanding.

 

Or is it really not worth the hassle, and should I just pay up to make them go away? What say you, team?

 

Thank you all very much in advance for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, First of all congratulations on your fantastic forum and thank you for all the friendly and knowledgable advice I've already read on here. I wonder if I could get your input on this rather strange case...

 

About two years ago I opened a broadband account with O2, but then I moved house in January of last year, and as the new flat came with broadband preinstalled, I cancelled my account with O2. When I called them up to cancel the account I agreed with their customer service agent that they would send me a pre-paid return envelope to my new address so I could send them back the broadband router that came with the account. As I hadn't received the envelope a couple of weeks later I gave them another call around March time, to again request the return envelope and again confirm my new address. Again I did not get anything from them and I eventually forgot all about it because, frankly, I've got better things to do with my time than chasing them to do their job.

 

Fast forward to November this year when I received a letter from Fredrickson asking to get in touch with them. I ignored that one (after reading on here that this would be the best way forward - best advice ever). So far so good, but then I received another letter yesterday, naming O2 as their client, for a debt of £50. It does have the phone number of my old flat on it, so I suppose it really relates to me in some way (although for all I know it could be the people who lived there before or after me, as I did not take the phone number with me). They threaten they will add £70 to the debt if I don't pay in 7 days (can they do that, actually?)

 

Anyway, ok, it's "only" 50 quid (although that's frankly a lot of money for me at the moment). But it really annoys me that O2 would have decided to go down that route. They had ample opportunity to contact me at my new address, my email address, or even on my mobile number, and they even had an open direct debit from me until recently, they could have just taken the money out of my account.

 

Now my question is, do you think it would make sense to call O2 and see what they have say? Would they actually be able to still get Freds off my case? I still have that sodding router gathering dust sitting in my wardrobe, so they can have that back if they want.

 

Would it make sense to start a fight with Freds? I don't want them to add those £70, so there's that. But at the same time I'd rather they didn't get anything from me, because it really isn't my fault those £50 were still outstanding.

 

Or is it really not worth the hassle, and should I just pay up to make them go away? What say you, team?

 

Thank you all very much in advance for your help.

 

take all the cr*p back to your nearest o2 shop, get a reciept "DONE"

 

dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, well, thanks. Although as far as I see the situation O2 might not even want the cr*p back anymore if they have sold the debt on. Happy to get rid of the router but I don't see how that action would somehow filter through to Fredricksons? Really my question is in how far O2 still have any influence on Fredrickson's actions from here on out?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have O2 sold the debt or Fred's collecting on O2's behalf?

 

Ignore, telecommunication debts are not recorded onto your credit reference file like mobile phones.

 

I cannot see Fred's taking you to Court for a debt of £50, in fact Fred's gave me 7 days and then they start court action 8 months ago on a much larger debt which is still in-dispute and am still waiting (I did not respond to any of Fred's threatograms).

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...