Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Crapquest-litigation-bailiffs.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4540 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all,

 

I'm unemployed claiming JSA,

I owe Cap One £438.

 

I've just arranged payment plans for 2 priority debts-rent arreas and electricity which amount to £800.

I cant afford to pay out anymore.

 

I have written to crapquest on several occasions explaining this to them(by recorded delivery which they received and signed for).

 

The letter i got off them today is the"LETTER BEFORE ACTION".

They have given me a chance to make a final payment of £311 to end the matter.

If i dont contact them before 19th Jan to discuss the account they will start litigation proceedings which will mean solicitors, court action and bailiffs.

 

How do i deal with this matter.

Is their threats a lot of hot air to make me pay up or do i take this seriously.

Are they known to actually use bailiffs.

I cant even offer a token payment of £1/month at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this debt on your CRA file?

 

i bet not as they've offered a discount?

 

dont fall foul of their threat-o-grams

 

look carefully

their letters say:

might,mayl.could.should.intend.instructed etc etc

they NEVER say WILL.

 

they ARE NOT BAILIFFS

 

it would have to go to court

a ccj be given

and

for you to fail the CCJ

for ANY bailiffs to EVER get involved

 

and that is a VERY VERY long process

and certain not woth it for £500!

 

they are spoofing you.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thxs dx, please jog my memory (CRA) means? They have actually used the word "will". Here is the text they use:- "failure to contact us by date stated will mean your account will be progressed through our pre-litigation system. Your account will then be passed to our solicitor for legal action". Then they go on and explain about seeking an Order of the Court, Warrant of Execution and what the bailiffs will do etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thxs dx, please jog my memory (CRA) means? They have actually used the word "will". Here is the text they use:- "failure to contact us by date stated will mean your account will be progressed through our pre-litigation system. Your account will then be passed to our solicitor for legal action". Then they go on and explain about seeking an Order of the Court, Warrant of Execution and what the bailiffs will do etc.

 

Ah, but you have to read it in its context. What is pre-litigation? The same as pre-school or their pre-pubescent behaviour.

Remember, they have to do all the paperwork and the chasing. Capquest don't (normally) do court for such small amounts

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

cra - look in my sig below this or any of my posts

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What they will do is a lot of internal stuff, what they may do is take you to court. They would be stupid to commit to using words like 'will' for court action as most of the time they wont be going to court. The letter you got is probably mass produced with maybe some customisation for your specific purposes.

 

If you are accepting the debt and making an offer to pay, CQ can either accept token payments or just take you to court. what they probably shouldnt be doing is continually sending you threatening letters - they should do one or the other if you are claiming you cannot pay and have amde it clear to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

use their purchase rate

you cant use stat int till it goes to the FOS or you file for court.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...