Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Why is my new address "unacceptable" to KGM?


warriormonk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4565 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi.

 

Am moving house. Rang up the broker One Quote to inform them and get a quote for a new policy.

 

Then like a bolt out of the blue - I was told my new address was "unacceptable" to the underwriters - KGM. I was rather unhappy to say the least. To add insult to injury I'm having to pay them £72 to cancel!! (£35 admin plus some interest no doubt)

 

As a result I now have to cancel my policy with them and look for another insurer (a brief search has found many insurers who are more than happy to cover this address)

 

I am completely flummoxed by the whole affair. This is the securest place I have ever lived. I am moving into a block of flats with secure, gated courtyard parking. OK a passer by can get into the car park...but you'd have to know the PIN code to make off with the car. In 2007 there was a "once in a lifetime" flooding event here...I'm wondering if this is the reason.

 

I was wondering if anyone else has experienced such a refusal and/or has any idea how...

 

I might uncover the reasons KGM think my new address is "unacceptable"

Whether I now have to declare they have declined my new address (and if so what the repurcussions might be)

Whether they can be challenged if their refusal has a negative impact on future quotes etc.

 

I'm now going to lie down in a darkened room

Link to post
Share on other sites

I work for an insurance broker, and get asked this all day.

 

Your insurance company declined the new address because the rate the new postcode as an unacceptable risk.

 

It may be a safer area, less crime, parked overnight securely etc.. but it isnt just the crime statistics they look at. They will see how many claims have been made in the area within a period of time, and the costs incurred with those claims. Its a standard thing with all insurance companies. Some like my postcode, some hate it!

 

You are having to pay a cancelation fee, because your insurance policy is a 12mth contract between u and the insurance company based upon the information you provided that the insurer found acceptable. Unfortunately by changing your address to one they wont quote on, its seen as you have broken the contract as such, and unfortunately you are liable for the cancellation fee. Although if u made a complaint to their complaints department, they may agree to waive the cancellation fee.

 

You dont need to disclose this to any other insurance company. Your policy has been cancelled, but not in a negative way by the insurer. Look at is as the insurer couldnt continue cover, and not it was cancelled. If you new insurer asks why the policy cancelled early, just say you moved address and your new address is a decline according to their underwriting criteria.

 

and finally, you can't challenge this at all. The insurance company can quote and decline on any address that they want. They are the one's taking the risk by insuring you. You could attempt to challenge this, but you would be wasting your time. It unfortunately wont change anything with your old insurer, and it won't affect your future premiums due to them declining to cover the new postcode

Link to post
Share on other sites

I work for an insurance broker, and get asked this all day.

 

Your insurance company declined the new address because the rate the new postcode as an unacceptable risk.

 

It may be a safer area, less crime, parked overnight securely etc.. but it isnt just the crime statistics they look at. They will see how many claims have been made in the area within a period of time, and the costs incurred with those claims. Its a standard thing with all insurance companies. Some like my postcode, some hate it!

 

You are having to pay a cancelation fee, because your insurance policy is a 12mth contract between u and the insurance company based upon the information you provided that the insurer found acceptable. Unfortunately by changing your address to one they wont quote on, its seen as you have broken the contract as such, and unfortunately you are liable for the cancellation fee. Although if u made a complaint to their complaints department, they may agree to waive the cancellation fee.

 

You dont need to disclose this to any other insurance company. Your policy has been cancelled, but not in a negative way by the insurer. Look at is as the insurer couldnt continue cover, and not it was cancelled. If you new insurer asks why the policy cancelled early, just say you moved address and your new address is a decline according to their underwriting criteria.

 

and finally, you can't challenge this at all. The insurance company can quote and decline on any address that they want. They are the one's taking the risk by insuring you. You could attempt to challenge this, but you would be wasting your time. It unfortunately wont change anything with your old insurer, and it won't affect your future premiums due to them declining to cover the new postcode

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are having to pay a cancelation fee, because your insurance policy is a 12mth contract between u and the insurance company based upon the information you provided that the insurer found acceptable. Unfortunately by changing your address to one they wont quote on, its seen as you have broken the contract as such, and unfortunately you are liable for the cancellation fee.

 

Well Mallrat, if you hadn't said you worked for an insurance company, I think we would have guessed anyway from that statement!!

 

Since when did moving house become a breach of contract? Most people would accept that there may be occasions when, by moving house, your insurance company do not wish to continue insuring you, however, I doubt many (if any) will accept that the insurance company can call that a "cancellation" of the policy by the customer and charge their punitive penalty charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...