Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Court Summons For TV Licesnce


Munchkyne
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4483 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Firstly have you admitted liability. I'm assuming you did when you signed the form.

 

If I were you I would contact TV licencing immediately (by phone and re-enforced with a special delivery letter) and offer to pay the licence for the unlicensed periods, explain that you have now got a TV licence and ask them to drop the case. It is usually a rubber stamp job and very very rare for people to go to jail for first offences. On your defense form ask the judge to consider you current financial status, the fact you have young ones and also the fact that you have offered to pay tv licencing for the unlicenced periods. GO TO COURT!!! submit the evidence and you should get off with a slap on the wrist. Give me 10 minutes and ill even write the letter for you.

  • Confused 1

:whoo:Debt Paid £9.99 - Unlawful Debt Removed £51.09 - Total Debt Busted £61.08:whoo:

SFUK vs Jacamo / JD Williams - WON

SFUK vs Vanquis Bank - Ongoing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give me a sec im still working on it

:whoo:Debt Paid £9.99 - Unlawful Debt Removed £51.09 - Total Debt Busted £61.08:whoo:

SFUK vs Jacamo / JD Williams - WON

SFUK vs Vanquis Bank - Ongoing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here you are!!

 

Dear Sir / Madam

 

I am writing to you to offer my unreserved apology on failing to get a TV licence after a visit from one of your officers.

 

I currently live at at home with a 9 month old baby and a three year old toddler. The demands of parent hood have facilitated an oversight on my part which has now been rectified. Whilst I appreciate that I have committed an offence, I would like you to consider my circumstances earlier on in the year shortly after I gave birth to my baby. I have now made arrangements to ensure this oversight does not happen again.

 

I understand you have applied to the courts under Section 363 of the communications act. As a gesture on my part, I would like to offer the licence fee for the unlicensed period and request that the matter be dropped from the court process. If this is not the policy of the BBC, then I shall ask the courts to take my circumstances at the time into consideration and show them that I am now licensed and have offered the fee for the unlicensed period.

 

Kind Regards

 

Munch

 

When phoning remember you catch more flies with sugar then you do vinegar and if you are forced to go to court then be very apologetic and explain your financial problems to the judge and im sure you will be ok

 

 

SFUK :)

:whoo:Debt Paid £9.99 - Unlawful Debt Removed £51.09 - Total Debt Busted £61.08:whoo:

SFUK vs Jacamo / JD Williams - WON

SFUK vs Vanquis Bank - Ongoing

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hey Munch

 

Did you get this sorted?

 

SFUK

:whoo:Debt Paid £9.99 - Unlawful Debt Removed £51.09 - Total Debt Busted £61.08:whoo:

SFUK vs Jacamo / JD Williams - WON

SFUK vs Vanquis Bank - Ongoing

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...