Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Parents and teens alike are trading in their smartphones for "dumber" models to help stay offline.View the full article
    • The coffee giant is suffering as customers "lose it" over price hikes and other controversies.View the full article
    • Victims as far afield as Singapore, Peru and the United Arab Emirates fell prey to their online scams.View the full article
    • Rights groups warn of state paranoia as experts on hypersonics, the science behind ultrafast missiles, have been jailed.View the full article
    • The Contract itself The airport is actually owned by the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan. There should be an authority from them for Bristol airport group  to sign on their behalf. Without it the contract is invalid. The contract has so many  clauses redacted that it is questionable as to its fairness with regard to the Defendants ability to receive a fair trial. In the case of WH Holding Ltd, West Ham United Football Club Ltd -v- E20 Stadium LLP [2018],  In reaching its decision, the Court gave a clear warning to parties involved in litigation: ‘given the difficulties and suspicions to which extensive redaction inevitably gives rise, parties who decide to adopt such an appropriate in disclosure must take enhanced care to ensure that such redactions are accurately made, and must be prepared to suffer costs consequences if they are not’. The contract is also invalid as the signatories are required to have their signatures co-signed by independent witnesses. There is obviously a question of the date of the signatures not being signed until 16 days after the start of the contract. There is a question too about the photographs. They are supposed to be contemporaneous not taken several months before when the signage may have been different or have moved or damaged since then. The Defendant respectfully asks the Court therefore to treat the contract as invalid or void. With no contract there can be no breach. Indeed even were the contract regarded as valid there would be no breach It is hard to understand why this case was brought to Court as there appears to be no reasonable cause to apply to the DVLA.............
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mobile Money Help request


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4687 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

Looking for some plain, simple, easy to understand advice please?

 

I have/had a loan with Mobile Money (Bristol Office) which I took out in March 11. I do realise how stupid this was with hindsight. I immediately fell into difficulties due to family bereavements, extended hospital stays, etc, and as a result, did not make any payments on the loan.

 

On Friday 29th July, 2 men turned up to collect the car. They had a tow truck. I had been in touch with MM (by letter) asking for time to get caught up and proposing a payment scheme that would eventually get me back on track. I was awaiting a response. To cut a long story short, they left with the car (one of them drove it away - it wasn't taken on the truck). The person I had communicated with previously was on holiday, but spoke with the area manager, who advised me he would look at it monday 1st August, as he had left the office for the weekend. He did confirm verbally that the car would not be auctioned until the 15th Aug, and that full settlement would prevent this. He also promised me he would email confirmation of that when he got home, but nothing to date received (and he will not answer his phone to me).

 

Before anyone points out that I am an idiot and perhaps get what I deserve for defaulting on my payments, then let me just say that I know, and if there is nothing I can do then so be it. I will take it on the chin.

 

If however there is anything I can do, then I would be very grateful for any constructive advice given. A few points that may be noteworthy are:

 

 

  • I asked the 'bailiffs' from LT Holdings to see his SIA ID - he told me he did not need one (his ID was actually pathetic. I could create a more professional looking one on my laptop and home printer. No phone number, no ID number, just photo, his name, company name. Nothing else!) He also has no uniform (mucky jeans and t-shirt)
  • As they were leaving they gave me a letter from MM titled 'Repossession Instruction & Authority'. At the bottom of this it says 'Enclosed: Bill of Sale, Copy Credit Agreement, Copy Default notice (Not to be left with third parties)' - None of these were enclosed, and I do not consider myself to be a third party.
  • Some of my personal possessions were/are in the car. Most notably my sat nav, which I got one of the guys to add to the Vehicle Receipt.
  • At the time of signing the documents and taking out the loan, there were only 2 people present - The rep who dealt with me, and the branch manager. With regards to what (I think) I read about the Bill of Sale surely if the manager is a witness, he is not a proper one as he has a vested interest?
  • The car is essential to my job, and as a result of this and not having any alternative transport, I have had to tender my resignation. This was pointed out to both the Area Manager and the 'Bailiffs' who both completely disregarded it.

Having spent a few hours trawling through the pages here, I am not much wiser sadly, as what I really need is step by step instructions laid out in layman's terms. I am not too good with technical language sadly...

 

Many thanks for any advice that anyone may have for me. :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know a lot about these but was under the belief that if the BOS is invalid then they may have a problem. Have you read this http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?112358-Bill-Of-Sales-and-repossession-of-goods . You may have to send for a copy of the BOS.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...