Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • All righty, seems I know why it was so quiet, basically the case was in transfer. I just got a letter from my local county court stating that they will be now taking over from Nots (dated 28 May 2024, wow) But no other correspondence so far. Will keep you posted
    • Hey,  I've messaged my husband but he is not contactable while he is in work. As soon as he is on his way home I will find out which finance company we used. I'm so sorry, I just don't know.
    • Okay, I have read your claim form. A pity you didn't come to us earlier. You haven't pleaded any legal basis for your claim and you haven't cited the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties Act. How long have you been aware of this forum? We will have to bring that out later when you do your witness statement. Once again, do the reading very carefully. I suggest that you wait until Monday before coming back here and confirming that you have read everything. And in particular, as I have indicated, read the thread which I posted above very carefully and in particular we the details of the contractual terms which were discovered and get a copy for yourself. Post a link to them in this thread as well for other people to see. They are relying on the fact that you don't have a direct contract with them and they are referring to a contractual term which is apparently in the contract between them and Packlink which specifically excludes third parties. You will definitely want to see this. They have tried to rely on this before but they have never produced the contract. In your witness statement you will have to request that they produced the contract in court. In terms of the mediation, frankly we would have advised you to decline mediation. It's all done secretively. Nothing is ever revealed and of course they will try to get you to compromise on the amount of money you are claiming. We would strenuously suggest that you don't give up a single penny. Do the reading that I have suggested, find the details of the contract which I have told you about which accepts direct liability to you, the customer – and post it here.
    • If there is no reply to the "nasty" mail in 48 hours, then please come back here and we can assess what to do.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

overdraft and statute barred


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4610 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks, been trying to clean up my credit file this year and have recent copies of all of them. I had two overdrafts years ago (they were joint accounts but after a horrendous relationship I put them in my name just to get away) and then I lost my job and had no payments going in. One of the banks recalled the od in June 2005 and requested full and immediate repayment, and the other in August 2005 (amazingly I found the letters from the bank confirming this the other day).

 

I have seen on my credit file that both are listed with defaults at the beginning of Sept 2005 (even though the first bank requested repayment in June). I have suddenly been receiving lots of DCA letters about these accounts and I am scared they might issue a CCJ by default in the next few weeks

 

My question is: if the banks recalled the OD and demanded repayment in June/Aug 2005 would this not count as the default date, and not the date listed on the credit report, in which case both are statute barred? There is no way I could afford to repay even token payments at the moment and I am petrified of it happening.

 

I just want to know so I can be prepared if or when I do get CCJ papers or even to send them a statute barred letter now.

 

Thanks :!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The last payments into the accounts were around April 2005 as that is when i lost my job. I was told by someone who works for a bank that statute barred time for overdrafts doesn't start until the bank recalls the facility - is this not right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to get that date substantiated, did you make

any written acknowledgement of the debts after the last

payments were made, if so when?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, never. In fact until the past few months I have had no letters from either bank or DCAs since late 2005. I didn't reply to anything and there are no CCjs at the addresses I have lived at.

 

I can't remember the last time I spoke to either bank but I am certain it will have been early 2005, after I lost my job I stuck my head in the sand and just ignored them and opened a basic account elsewhere for my JSA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phone call are of no consequence as it must

be written acknowledgement, to be sure

collate all the info you have and double check.

I would ignore the DCA's for now.

Let us know who they are as we will probably

know what tactics they use.

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

One was Aktiv capital and the other I think is Lowell.

 

I say think because I have just checked my file online and one of the accounts has disappeared from my credit report :???: It was on there last week and had a latest default date in September. Why would this suddenly happen?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was this just an update to the entry, there can only ever

be one default on a debt, if it's dropped of it must

be over six years old.

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just looked at the last report (from last week) and it is there and the date defaulted is "15 September 2005". Now there it does not appear at all. I thought it wouldn't disappear until after 15 Sept this year? I think I'm getting paranoid because of reading so many dirty tricks by the DCAs. I hope it doesn't reappear with a new date!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It maybe that the creditor/DCA has had it removed due

to the date of the last payment.

Brig

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, or ignore and play silly Bu**ers until they get stroppy

then send it:madgrin:

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've spent the last few hours on here looking into this! Just before I go again (and to make me fell really better) if I do get a summons in the next month or so before the default date for the account that remains on my file, will I be able to defend against it at that point to the court? Part of me is wondering whether to send them a 'prove it' letter to stall the process for a few weeks until the default date passes!

 

I really need to stop worrying about this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've spent the last few hours on here looking into this! Just before I go again (and to make me fell really better) if I do get a summons in the next month or so before the default date for the account that remains on my file, will I be able to defend against it at that point to the court? Part of me is wondering whether to send them a 'prove it' letter to stall the process for a few weeks until the default date passes!

 

I really need to stop worrying about this!

 

 

IF you get Court papers and your last payment was April 2005, the Stat Barred is a FULL defence!

 

Jogs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once it's dropped of the files they would be wasting there time

and money, and a judge would want to know why the had waited

6 years to take action.

Who are the DCA's chasing the debt now?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are Bu**ered then no chance any

contact off with the SB letter.

Sit back and play them along if they try anything.

It's as said the last payment or acknowledgement

that starts the clock.:madgrin:

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is simple just believe YOU ARE IN CHARGE,

not some manky oik in a DCA office.:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

i have been having a similar problem to this and keep resding conflicting info.

Does anyone know for sure if an overdraft becomes statute barred 6 years after the last date that you paid money into the account or 6 years from the date that the bank recall the overdraft and demand payment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Overdrafts and current accounts are not covered

by the CCA 1974, but any debt that has had no

payment or written acknowledgmen in 6 clear years

will be come Statute Barred (5 years in Scotland when the debt is actually extinguished)

in England and Wales the debt remains recoverable but

judgement cannot be enforced in court.

The OFT Guiadance 2003/2011 states ''that it is unfair to continue to

press for payment of a statute barred debt once the debtor has

informed the creditor that the debt is SB and they will not be paying''

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I month from that date in reality because the time

is based on the date of the last delinquent payment ie the

missed payment that is the cause of action == placing

the default on file.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...