Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. I am reading through the full thread and will continue to research. I have come across a reference to a form called N180 DQ in the thread, but I cannot see any reference to this form in my case nor can I see it on the MoneyClaim website. Should I have been sent this form? Thanks 
    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Removing a default notice with Capital One


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4643 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good day everyone. I have recently had a default notice that has been applied to my credit file from Cap1 in relation to my credit card.

 

I have been working away from home recently and after returning home on the 24th June 2011, I read the various letters of correspondence from Cap1 and acted accordingly. The main letter of concern was the default notice dated 25th May 2011, which requested that a minimum payment of £264.98 was made within 30 days. As I was just within this deadline I did make an immediate payment from my HSBC current account for the TOTAL arrears outstanding amount of £536.00 which I assumed would then bring my account up to date and going forward I would then proactively make the payments when due in line with the statements sent.

However, I later received a letter confirming that you had proceeded to advance with the default notice so I did call their customers services centre to establish why this was the case.

Basically it seems that my payment of £536.00 only showed up in their account on the 28th June, which in turn was too late and you had already filed the default notice assuming no payment was to be made by my self. I was told that the default notice was issued on the 27th June just one day before my payment was physically received.

Knowing the long-term affects this may have on my credit rating, I would appreciate it if you think I have any room to argue this decision and look at getting this default notice removed?

 

 

Would it be worth just writing to them explaining the situation from my point of view in the hope that they can emphasise with the fact the funds only appeared a day later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ben

 

 

 

 

 

Welcome to CAG

 

 

 

 

The guys will be happy to advise as soon as they are available.

 

Thread moved.

 

Hi Ben,

 

 

You will need I think to make a formal complaint to the bank

regarding the default and the payment being received 1 day late, the CRA's

can only remove with permission from the bank.

I think this may be unfair as the banking system allows

the receiving bank to see ''pending'' debits and credits to accounts probably 12 -24 hours

before they are posted on to you account.

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi, did you managed to get this removed? since I doubt that they will do it. I was advised to launch a claim for unfair charges and as part of the resolution make the default removal a condition of settlement it. this way you have some leverage to get there attention.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is some argument in

and around the '' bargaining''

for default removal, I have

dealt with a case that involved

an F&F with the default to be removed

but there was a another matter involved

requiring the need of judicial intervention

when the judge saw the agreement to

remove the default he would not allow

it as the account would not show the

true and accurate status of the account.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

BRIGADIER2JCS,

 

based on that the best scenario is to negotiate but keep out of courts. I guess the card providers are going to be aware of that judgement so best course of action is to push hard, negotiate hard and make yourself be a pain in the butt and in the end compromise on some of the unlawful fees in favour of removing the default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess so,as the case was in chambers

and not liable to become case law it affects

nothing, but I think some of the judiciary

may look at settlements put before a court

quite carefully, this may affect some deals

say made in the granting of a Tomlin order.

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...