Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Bozo's buddy Peter Cruddas seems to have switched parties. Tory peer Peter Cruddas shared posts supporting Nigel Farage and Reform UK | Conservatives | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Exclusive: almost half of billionaire Tory donor’s last 100 reposts were in support of rightwing party
    • Have a look at this please check that it is all correct, fill in the blanks, if there is anything wrong then tell us. Anything you want to add. Anything you want to take away. So, broadly this letter
    • Thank you. Can you explain what part needs to be amended. I’m sorry, I don’t understand which part is referring to right to reject. Should I be including  they are in breach of contract because the vehicle is not satisfactory quality. Clearly because of the way the windscreen was fitted it was not satisfactory quality when it was purchased and it has not remained in satisfactory condition for a reasonable period of time – witness the leakage and the corrosion in the car.    instead of    Therefore, I expect Doves to take responsibility for the costs incurred, as per the Consumer Rights Act 2015 “should a fault appear outside of 6 months, it's for the consumer to prove the fault was present at time of sale”     
    • I agree with you, UB. More parties might not be such a bad thing. More on Farage's manifesto - sorry, contract.  
    • Sorry but first of all you are still referring to your six-month right to reject – but you didn't assert your right within six months so this is not relevant. The situation is that you cannot reject the vehicle unless it is a write off or you have been deprived of the use of it for a significant period of time so that it can be said that you have been deprived of substantially the whole benefit of the contract. By my understanding that is not the case here. Your complaint must be that they are in breach of contract because the vehicle is not satisfactory quality. Clearly because of the way the windscreen was fitted it was not satisfactory quality when it was purchased and it has not remained in satisfactory condition for a reasonable period of time – witness the leakage and the corrosion in the car. On this basis you are holding them responsible for the cost of repairs which are £XXX and any ancillary costs reasonably incurred as a result of their breach of contract. You are currently without the car and this is not a situation which can continue. You are enclosing the evidence plus quotations for repair and you want that by the end of the week you want them to agree to the repairs. Broadly that. Please post a draft as soon as possible. You don't want to hang around on this
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

notice period and payment


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4752 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I resigned from my job on monday 13th july 2011

 

I was told by my manager to leave immediately, hand in my keys and uniform.

 

I am supposed to give 4 weeks notice as stated in my contract of employment

 

what I need to know is, am i entitled to payment for the notice period, as well as outstanding holiday and any other paid work.

 

seeing as i wasnt allowed to work my notice period

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have worked there about 9 months,

 

it states in my contract upto 12 years service.

 

from employee 4 weeks,

 

from employer one week for every completed year of service subject to a minimum period of one week

 

i resigned, it wasnt a case of them sacking me or giving me notice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right. Well, they should have given you one weeks notice, if they wished to terminate.

Unless they could show that they had grounds to dismiss without notice, due to gross misconduct. And I don't think handing ones notice in amounts to GM.

So yes, you're owed a weeks pay plus accrued holiday pay and anything else they might owe you.

Write them a letter. Headline it LETTER BEFORE ACTION

Set out what you are owed and give 'em 7 days to pay.

State that non-payment will result in legal action.

Send the letter by recorded delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there were no issues with my work at all, the reason I was leaving is because I have been offered another job which starts in 5 weeks time.

 

surely they are obliged to pay the full 4 weeks, as they are not letting me work my notice period. even though i was willing too

Link to post
Share on other sites

that maybe the case, but they didnt.

 

surely that makes the difference, because i resigned in my letter it clearlt stated the following

 

As required by my contract of employment, I hereby give you 4 week’s notice of my intention to leave my position as a driver.

I have decided that it is time to move on; this was not an easy decision and took a lot of consideration. However, I am confident that by doing this will help me move towards some of the goals I have for my career

Link to post
Share on other sites

that maybe the case, but they didnt.

 

surely that makes the difference, because i resigned in my letter it clearlt stated the following

 

As required by my contract of employment, I hereby give you 4 week’s notice of my intention to leave my position as a driver.

I have decided that it is time to move on; this was not an easy decision and took a lot of consideration. However, I am confident that by doing this will help me move towards some of the goals I have for my career

So you need to point that out to them and demand to be compensated for their breach of contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello guys. I don't know the answer to this, but is it permitted for the employer to give a week's notice when the employee has to give 4 weeks?

 

My best, HB

Yes, if that's the contractual agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...