Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

SRJ - Calling me at work


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4745 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have received a call from SRJ whilst I'm at work! However when I took the call after it was transferred by reception - nobody spoke and then they hung up. I work for a solicitors, I've had other people calling me at work before, there is a nonsence conversation as they want an address they've been alledgedly writing to me too, whenever I give them any addresses I've lived at for the past 6 years they say they cannot give me details as the address doesn't match!

 

What I would really like to know if any of you out there can tell me - is how do I stop them calling me at work. Previously I've said its my place of work and I cannot take personal calls. As I said I work for solicitors and they will not be impressed!

 

I think this could possibly relate to a debt incurred by my ex-husband failing to pay for credit when we'd split and then he sold the house with the items included in the sale i..e a cooker and fridge.

 

Any help would be really appreciated as I find these calls intimidating. I'm not sure if I'm in the right forum/thread as new to this. Many many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SRJ Debt Recoveries Limited PO Box 1173, Woking, Surrey GU22 2BS

 

Also sen SRJ this;

 

Dear Sir or Madam

 

Harassment by telephone

 

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

 

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls. (Delete if necessary)

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only. [if you Want Them to]

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded. (**Even if you don‘t yet have recording equipment!!**)

 

Yours faithfully, **Print name do not sign**

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for your prompt reply. If I get more calls I will tell them this. When I was getting calls previously from another company I believe I told them we were not allowed personal calls at work to which the lady did apologise and said the number would be taken off their system. Its futile conversations anyway as when I couldn't give them the address to which they'd been writing they said they couldn't talk to me because of the Data Protection Act, so it was pointless!

Link to post
Share on other sites

they dont listen

 

write them

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send it Recorded too.

 

They ignore letters - or at least did with me then passed it to somebody else, so it is useful to be able tp prove that they are ignorant!

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all your advice - that's great, I've asked our receptionist here at work if she receives any more calls from them to say I'm not allowed personal calls at work and also they are in breach of the Acts which are set out in the template letter. However with regard to sending them mail what if I don't want to give them my new address, as clearly they don't have this as I'm not getting any letters from them? I find these calls so intimidating. Thank you again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok fantastic, will do. Was thinking of asking for one of the solicitors here in the office to send them a letter if they continued harrassing me quoting the Acts etc.
Good idea, also have a read of the OFT guidelines attached & see how many breaches they are making. ;)oft1107.pdf
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

it's only classed as harrassment if they contact you by each means more than once a day unfortunately. So they can call you only once per day at work they can call once at home they can e-mail you only once per day the can write once per day and they can text once per day. aslong as it's once per day per means that can get around it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is not definitive description ...........

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...