Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

What address for taking DVLA to court ?


kevincharles
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4830 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

l finally picked up the forms from the county court to take the DVLA to court for wrongly accusing my car of being parked on a public road when it was parked in a pvt carpark.

This was all accepted byt eh DVLA in court last yr and the case was thrown out due to no evidence.

Now l have to claim back the clamping fee l paid to have removed by the DVLA that day.

 

My Question is :

which address do l put down for the DVLA on the small claims county court form???

is it possibly the local address that was shown on the original court summons to me? which is * Station road, Sidcup..... or do l have put down their head office ???

l'm alos pretty crap at explaining things in writing. If one of you guys could briefly tell me what l have to say on the county court claims form l'd really be greatful.

Regards

Kevin.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who did you pay the clamping fee to? Not the DVLA, I'm pretty sure

Link to post
Share on other sites

ahhhhhh well looks like a trip to CAB on Monday to find out this question.

l thought this site sounded to good to be true.

Taken over by Advertisers no doubt ;-[

The sad thing is l'll probably get a few responses to this *moan* and not anything related to the question ;-]

Link to post
Share on other sites

ahhhhhh well looks like a trip to CAB on Monday to find out this question.

l thought this site sounded to good to be true.

Taken over by Advertisers no doubt ;-[

The sad thing is l'll probably get a few responses to this *moan* and not anything related to the question ;-]

 

Possibly, but bare in mind that it is the weekend and a lot of the CAG users don't necessarily spend much time on here on Saturday and Sunday. I am sure you wouldn't want any of us who don't really know the answer to your question chipping in with some ill-founded opinion.

 

If you could hang fire till Monday then the site activity will pick up and I am sure you will get some well constructed advise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

due to the clampers and the DVLA being seperate, (the ncp are the boys that the dvla pay to clmap and remove untaxed veh's) you'd have to put the clampers pound address on your papers.

 

Once you'd proved that the land was private, the clampers should have removed the clamp at no charge, how come they didnt?

 

chin up x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks bird very much,

 

l tried so hard to explain to the person at he clamp pound that l had made a SORN and that the car was parked off road but..... she just kept repeating according to the inforement officer who attended my vehicle was parked on the public highway. They gave me little choice... either pay £260 within 24 hours or it will then go upto £360 and then removed.

Of course l tokk photos of my car clamped in our extremely pvt carpark.... some 25 metres off the main road would you believe.

Eventually l got a summons to appear in court for being parked on the highway with an untaxed vehicle.

At court all the cases were just DVLA and the DVLA had their own man there.

l had land registry evidence from the council who were great sending me a letter stating the area clearly was pvt, along with the photo's. The DVLA imeddiately said there has been an almighthy mix up here obviously, and 5 mins later we went back into the court and the case was dismissed due to no evidence.

l have left it over a yr since then, but now its really getting on my nerves letting them get away scot free. so l have decided to claim back the £260 clamping release fee.

Thanks so so much l shall put the NCP DVLA pound at White city London down as the address on the county court papers.

l also have the officers name who clamped my vehicle, should l also put his name down before the NCP DVLA pound address ????

 

Thanks so much Kevin.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...