Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

To those that have or are getting Charging Orders this should allay a lot of fears


jimbo45
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3382 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

There seems to be a lot of fear over the Charging Order process that a lot of the more greedier DCA's seem to be rushing headlong into.

 

Read this snippet first

http://ezinearticles.com/?I-Have-a-Charging-Order---Can-I-Be-Forced-to-Sell-My-Home?&id=2756267

 

Many people are totally scared of these but the reality is that you almost CERTAINLY won't be forced to sell your home especially for fairly small amounts of debt (usually under 9,000 GBP).

 

Note also for Money loaned under a CCA then NO INTEREST can be charged on a CO or for money NOT subject to the various CCA's then the same is true for amounts of up to 5,000 GBP. Most people on these forums will find their debt is actually subject to the various CCA's so if you have been unable to pay a CCJ and you get a CO then interest stops STONE DEAD at that point.

 

You are in a decent bargaining position -- the creditor say bought your 5,000 GBP debt for around 20 GBP -- HORRENDOUS but true -- debts are usually sold on for about 2 - 5% of their value.

 

So offer a lowish full and Final settlement -- you can state that the DCA can wait say 30 years to get their money --inflation etc will have eaten away at the debt in this time or they can have some real money in the meantime.

 

These days a CO is really a fairly useless weapon -- it's a bit harder and more aggro to deal with an SD because a really NASTY DCA (are there any NICE one's ?) could actually go through with the Bankruptcy process.

 

Cheers

jimbo

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jimbo

 

I offered 10% from the onset, but all the calls, letters, my time, postage, reseach, the weather, the price of cocoa beans, the offer will be below 5%.

 

Hi there

Please post back if they accept it.

What will probably happen they will reject it as too small. What you should then do is either sit on it for a few months and then offer again or try a slightly higher one.

 

They might come back with accepting say 40% but reject this as well -- you'll probably end up with an offer of around 17 - 20%. Depending on the size of the debt this could be a reasonable deal --- I really think that NOBODY WHO BUYS DEBTS SHOULD EVER GET THE FULL AMOUNT. It's a totally immoral and disgusting business -- really intrinsically EVIL whatever deity you follow (or none).

 

Note if you DO get a Full and FINAL make sure that IT IS FULL AND FINAL and that when paid the CO is removed from the Land Registry.

 

Cheers

jimbo

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...