Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • As I'm off on holiday on Wednesday and won't be around I'll bring things forward and be pessimistic and decide that Iceland won't cooperate.  There are two things to ponder. The private parking companies have a lot in common for obvious reasons.  But also some differences. Excel and its sister company VCS are by far the most litigious.  They take large numbers of motorists who don't pay them to court - perhaps the majority.  That's not because they have a good case.  Indeed their case is rubbish.  It's because, sadly, enough people are terrified of the idea of going to court and just pay up when the court papers arrive.  It's a numbers game to Excel/VCS. In cases where the motorist is in it for the long haul, Caggers win 85% of the time in court against Excel/VCS (yes, I did once go back and counted all the court cases over the previous 30 months).  But Excel/VCS take the odd defeat because of the mugs who just panic and pay.  So take this into account when deciding what to do. Secondly, without boring you with the reasons, I know about the world of local journalism.  Papers have great difficulty in filling their column inches.  If you do contact the local media there is a 100% chance that they will publish something and embarrass Iceland - and maybe get them to back down. Again, have a think if this is a road you want to to go down. If you don't win by Wednesday!  
    • Followed up with letter which is no surprise as I’m easy to find via electoral roll. Letter says we have been asked to recover from you on behalf f our client in Middle East x amount. if you believe you are not liable please contact us - yeah right! If you wish to make payment here are our client bank details which look genuine and relate directly to a Dubai bank. ” if you don’t engage our client may take further action” etc blah blah blah. its the same type phrases used by CWD/IDRWW/IDR etc…..   I ignored the email, blocked the text number and will wait to see if I receive any formal action via Mail but seems like the same tactic I’ve seen for 10 years plus and I’ve ignored all. just for people’s info
    • Hi. I expect the experts will be along later to advise you. In the meantime, I've amended your thread title to show the car park name and location. HB
    • i can instruct my gof to sit, but if it does is an entirely diff matter. WL are acting here as a DCA and are not the OWNER of the debt, lowells are, so jog on WL... until very very recent we've never seen lowells raise a scottish claim Lowell/Shoes SPC Claim Forfar Sheriff Court - Old Newday Credit Card. - Scotland Financial Legal Issues - Consumer Action Group  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4868 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi! everyone

i am new to all this so i will get straight to the point, today a bailiff from JBWgroup called when i was out and spoke to my wife and ask for my son by name, she said she was his mother but our son had left home some ten years ago, he had a vehicle registered at our address which had incurred some penalties while working in london, we knew he had the vehicle registered at our address as he works all over the country living in hotels and b&bs, so we collect his mail,

 

this was the first we had heard of the penalties. the bailiff left a form with the details about the £500 dept but the form did not have our sons name on it just "Mr" and our family name. i contacted the bailiff when i arrived home and explained that it was my sons vehicle and was not owned by me and that my son had not lived here for over ten years, i explained that relations with our son were strained and he may turn up once in a blue moon, to which he replied he would give me until monday to find my son or he would have to take goods to the value. i informed him that he would not be taking any of our belongings, he said the vehicle is registered at our address and that was enough to seize goods, to which i replied i have not committed any offence and he would need to have a first name such as the one he used when asking my wife if our son was home. sorry to be long winded but i would like to know where my wife and i stand should they return on monday.

 

any help would be most appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

You dont need to contact the bailiff. Tracing your son or paying his debts is not your problem.

 

If a bailiff turns up then do not open the door and ask him to leave quietly. As a threat to take goods not berlonging to the debtor has been made, you will need to report this to police (take copies of all documents with you) and get an incident number. If the bailiff carries out that threat, interferes with your goods or pesters you then you can call 999 and quote the incident number.

 

Theres a template letter you can hand to a bailiff thru a window somewhere on these forums.

 

 

 

 

To Whom it may concern

 

BY HAND

 

[DATE]

 

Dear Bailiffs,

 

Re: Your visit to [1st LINE OF ADDRESS]

 

This is to confirm the person you asked for by name does not live at this address and there is no property belonging to him here.

 

This document has been passed to you by hand and a photograph of you standing outside reading it has just been taken as proof of delivery.

 

I now respectfully ask that you quietly leave the property.

 

Yours Faithfully

 

 

YOUR NAME

 

Professional property investor and conveyancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's stretching the truth as usual.

 

He is allowed to make reasonable assumptions as to the ownership of goods, but...

 

His 'reasoning' is clearly contrary to; your statement, the date of birth of the debtor (unless you look rather young for your age!) and every means of address verification available to him.

 

Don't tell him where your son is or you validate his tactics.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi! everyone

i am new to all this so i will get straight to the point, today a bailiff from JBWgroup called when i was out and spoke to my wife and ask for my son by name, she said she was his mother but our son had left home some ten years ago, he had a vehicle registered at our address which had incurred some penalties while working in london, we knew he had the vehicle registered at our address as he works all over the country living in hotels and b&bs, so we collect his mail,

 

this was the first we had heard of the penalties. the bailiff left a form with the details about the £500 dept but the form did not have our sons name on it just "Mr" and our family name. i contacted the bailiff when i arrived home and explained that it was my sons vehicle and was not owned by me and that my son had not lived here for over ten years, i explained that relations with our son were strained and he may turn up once in a blue moon, to which he replied he would give me until monday to find my son or he would have to take goods to the value. i informed him that he would not be taking any of our belongings, he said the vehicle is registered at our address and that was enough to seize goods, to which i replied i have not committed any offence and he would need to have a first name such as the one he used when asking my wife if our son was home. sorry to be long winded but i would like to know where my wife and i stand should they return on monday.

 

any help would be most appreciated

 

I suspect that JBW are doing a little bit of "backtracking" here. I would ASSUME that the warrant in his possession DOES have your son's first name on it. Were you provided with a parking ticket number? This would start with two digits followed by 8 numbers. It is possible that this is one the letter left by the bailiff.

 

Otherwise, do you know which local authority issued this parking ticket?

 

If you do manage to find the PCN number then you MUST call the Traffic Enforcement Centre on 08457 045 007 ( you will need to press 6 to speak with an operator). Once through to them you need to ask them to CONFIRM to you the PRECISE name on the Warrant of Execution.

 

I suspect that I am right !!

 

If you can answer any of the above, please do post back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi! thanks for the help

the bailiff left just one A4 document which is their own enforcement notice with a JBW ref no: and the amount owed. no information regarding the nature of the charge against my son i can only assume its a parking or congestion charge in london, as the bailiff informed me on the phone that it was in london that the penalties were incurred thats as much as we know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi! thanks for the help

the bailiff left just one A4 document which is their own enforcement notice with a JBW ref no: and the amount owed. no information regarding the nature of the charge against my son i can only assume its a parking or congestion charge in london, as the bailiff informed me on the phone that it was in london that the penalties were incurred thats as much as we know.

 

Firstly, telephone CC London (Congestion Charging) on 0845 900 1234 and if you give them the number plate of your son's car they can let you know if there are any tickets against it. Also, they can find the information from the post code.

 

JBW do have a Contract with Transport for London for Congestion Charging. They also have a contract with Southwark.

 

If you call them and find a ticket, they should let you know whose name the Warrant is in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...