Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Item not fit for purpose but online seller refusing to refund


dc1234567890
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4853 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I bought a necklace online, and by the evening of the day of delivery the chain had snapped. I believe I am entitled to a refund under the SOGA as the item clearly didn't last a reasonable length of time and was not fit for purpose. I've been in contact with the seller and they are refusing to refund me until I send it back to the manufacturer "who will make a decision upon inspection." Communication has since come to a halt.

 

I'd appreciate if you'd tell me where I stand on this and what I should do next. I think I've included everything here but feel free to ask any questions if you need more info.

 

Thanks,

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey DC,

 

I'm sure some of the more knowledgable folk will be along soon, but in the meantime I would give Consumer Direct a call as well; very helpful, seem to know the regs. inside n out. They will give you a reference number if you need to get back in touch with them, and their website has a bunch of useful letter templates as well.

 

Don't know where you stand on the broken clasp though- maybe the store will come back and say that you were too heavy handed? Very subjective view point though.

 

Also, if you paid by CC or Visa Debit you ca get in touch with your card provider and ask for a charge back; somewhat easier with credit cards apparently- may be going down that route myself on the debit side, so will let you know how much of a nut ache it is.

 

Good luck with it n let us know what goes on :)

 

Ttfn,

 

Kyt

Link to post
Share on other sites

your contract is with the seller NOT the manufacturer.

 

the seller needs to deal with you.

 

if it was via Ebay raise a dispute with paypal and get your money back, that will get their attention if they are ignoring you, paypal 9/10 sides with the buyer, but in this case you are right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...