Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Today , after a lotof years i recieved a letter from this lot. Very friendly, "Were writing to remind you that we havent had any contact from you in a while".  The velvet fist, followed by  a veiled threat to get their preferred debt collectors involved. Yep dead right. In 1992/3 I took out a Student load under duress from DHSS. uP TO 2000 I hadsucessfully gotten deferment on low income. But rarther thansign on as unemployed,I decided to be self employed. I applied and they asked for all sorts of documents. I obliged and then correspondance ceased from them, circa 2001. To date  I have had no correspondance from Student Loans. I was made  redundant in 2009 and  reached 65 in 2012 , at which age the loan should have been cancelled. Now ,today, 12 years on retirement and 11 ( at least years after last contact) I get a letter with veiled threats. Do I , as I smell a scam a) ignore it and hope that Erudio will think that this phishing attempt has failed or b) respond with a statute barred letter or c) remind them of legal terms that loan should be cancelled 12 years ago or d) combination of b) +c)      
    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
    • As long as we are clear . Do the reading and post your letter of claim in draft form as requested and we can go from there.    
    • Hold on @BankFodder, that was a bit harsh. I spoke with the EVRi complaints Facebook group to begin with, a user on that group told me to send a letter but didn't give any specifics. Here at CAG, I was looking more for specific help as I've never raised such a claim before, and wanted to be sure that my claim was correct, which is why I've researched information with the other groups too, to be sure; but you seem to have assumed that I've made some form of contact with the other groups, such that I find your comments and tone to be very unfair. And I do know a thing or two about forums, that forum users are unpaid volunteers, I happen to be a Tableau Ambassador, and so perform a very similar role helping others in an unpaid capacity  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

2 month assured shorthold tenancy


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4893 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I am a landlord & require some help please!

I have agreed a short term assured shorthhold tenancy to a lady for 2 months on the basis that she is buying a property and has no where to live in the interim.

She came in to see me on 20th December, tenancy started 21st December. Tenancy signed & pres info signed. When she came in for keys i asked for the rent & she said it had been sent bacs & i would have it tomorrow.

I knew she was in the process of buying a property so trusted her, it was the day before Christmas and she would be homeless otherwise.

Anyway, i checked the bank and no rent, still no rent 20 days on. She is apparently ill and the money has left her account but still hasnt reached mine!

 

The tenancy is a full assured shorthold tenancy with a notice of intention to seek possession within.

Is it correct that even though the assured shorthold states 2 months a sect 21 is invalid until the 6 month term has come? and thus a sect 8 is also invalid?

Hence, the only grounds i have is for possession on sect 21 for lack of unpaid rent?

Rgds James

Link to post
Share on other sites

On occasions I feel guilty requiring cash up front from tenants if short notice means that cheques etc. can't clear in time. Your story makes me glad that I do. All the best, but sadly it sounds like the woman is conning you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would you have to wait 6 months to issue the s.21 if the tenant has only signed a 2 months short term tenancy agreement?

s.21 is a 8 week notice period?

If the tenant does not leave after the 8 week period then the landlord will need to start court proceedings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would you have to wait 6 months to issue the s.21 if the tenant has only signed a 2 months short term tenancy agreement?

s.21 is a 8 week notice period?

If the tenant does not leave after the 8 week period then the landlord will need to start court proceedings.

 

Essentially, ASTs give the tenant at least 6 months, even if the contract says less than 6 months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What if the tenant signs a 3 month agreement which includes the section 21 in the contract?

 

I.e - starts at the end of Nov 2010 and the last day is the 28th Feb 2011.

 

Will it still take the landlord 6 months to remove them from the property?

 

If the agreement is an Assured Shorthold Tenancy then I believe the answer is yes. The landlord would not have the benefits of using Section 21 followed by accelerated possession till 6 months were up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But surely the sect 8 is valid for unpaid rent? I am intending to issue a sect 8 when she does not pay her 2nd lot of rent

 

I have a notice of intention to seek possession (sect 21) within the tenancy agreement but as its a 2 month term i understand this will not now apply until the 6 months is up.

 

How do i stop this happening again? Is there any tenancy that can be drawn up for say 2 or 3 months that will stop future tenants doing the same?

 

Rgds James

Link to post
Share on other sites

But surely the sect 8 is valid for unpaid rent? I am intending to issue a sect 8 when she does not pay her 2nd lot of rent. Yes

 

I have a notice of intention to seek possession (sect 21) within the tenancy agreement but as its a 2 month term i understand this will not now apply until the 6 months is up. Correct

 

How do i stop this happening again? Is there any tenancy that can be drawn up for say 2 or 3 months that will stop future tenants doing the same? Holiday Let agreement?

 

Rgds James

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the agreement is an Assured Shorthold Tenancy then I believe the answer is yes. The landlord would not have the benefits of using Section 21 followed by accelerated possession till 6 months were up.

 

Does the 6 months only apply to new tenants only?

 

I.e-If you have been in a property for over 2 years would it still take 6 months to issue the s21?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on the tenancy agreement at the time. For 'new' tenants no matter how short the tenancy agreement a section 21 cannot expire until they have been there 6 months.

 

For current tenants, a section 21 cannot expire during a 'fixed term' i.e. the minimum period of any tenancy agreement signed. This may have been a tenancy renewal or a whole new agreement.

 

If no tenancy agreement was signed since the original 6/12 month one, then you would have a statutory periodic tenancy which requires no less than 2 months notice to expire at the end of a rental period, for a section 21 notice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A holiday let is different as it is not a tenancy per se, it is known as a 'license to occupy'.

 

Therefore, there is little or no protection from eviction, and a LL could simply come in and change the locks with any 'reasonable notice'. Obviously, what is reasonable to a LL wanting their property back, and a T who feels the property is their home, can be VERY different!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect that you would be on shakey grounds if you set up a 2 month "holiday let" with someone you knew was occupying the house as their principal home.

 

So basically nothing but a six month tenancy gives you any kind of security??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...