Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Lets draw a line under this. I'm not saying I won't upload documents to this site Consumer Action Group, and I'm not saying that I take issue with with CAG data security. I said, "Can you recommend a free offline pdf editor" this is so I can merge the pdf's into one file as requested. Online utilities can be helpful, but we only have their word that they shall delete the uploaded documents in a given timeframe, but have no means of validating this, neither can we confirm that their security is up to scratch, if they were hacked and they weren't deleting as they claimed, then- And so, as I do not wish to upload my documents to a free online pdf merge utility, and that bona fide tools such as Adobe quite rightly aren't free, and you have a maximum upload of 4.88MB, I offered my website - a source that I can control as a viable alternative. From there we seem to have descended into a chaos of misunderstandings and half-truths
    • We have both a savings account and a current account, so thought we would get the £100 fairer share bonus - but we won't. Why?View the full article
    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

My money is missing


dg211262
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6494 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

 

This is my first time here because I am looking for some advice on an ongoing problem I have. On the 17/07 my bank carried out a transaction on my behalf but as it was an International payment it had to go through correspondent banks to reach my account. My bank actually put the wrong IBAN number down so on the 24/07 they sent a correction notice but the money still didn't appear in my account. On the 03/08 they sent a recall notice and guess what...my funds still haven't been applied.

 

I have closed the account where the funds were originally supposed to go so I thought that the recall notice would simply take effect but boy has that been a mistake because still no money.

 

Now since the 17/07 quite a bit of my money has 'gone missing' and although my bank where it went from have tried their hardest to recall the funds, the bank where it was going to, The Abbey, are not trying to solve the problem and are not interested in resolving the issue so I am still a considerable amount missing.

 

Any ideas on what I should do to try and get somewhere with this problem would be very much appreciated as I am at my wits end with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where were the funds transferred from? Your bank may well be able to ask for the money to be sent back but you would incur a charge for them to return them to your account(transfer fee). Have the funds been applied to someone else's account? If not then they should be sitting in an internal account. The bank where the funds have been sent from should have an identification number that the bank should be able to trace where the funds are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bank that transferred the money have been great but due to the fact that it was a foreign transfer, correspondent banks were used as at the time the Abbey were having problems with their systems.

 

All banks involved apart from the Abbey have been really helpful but they are a nightmare to try and get information from and they just keep saying that as it is an incoming payment they can't chase it up even though I have given them the details.

 

If the funds were applied to a different account then someone has made a big mistake because even though the IBAN number was incorrect initially they aren't supposed to apply funds unless the IBAN number and account name match.

 

The bank that transferred the funds waived the fees for the transaction and aren't charging me to recall the funds but their hands are tied. I have spoken to numerous people without any success.

 

I even spoke to the police and they told me that as the funds were 'just a set of numbers' and that I hadn't actually had the cash in my hands and had it taken from me personally it wasn't theft or fraud.

 

Quite simply there just doesn't seem anywhere to go and the Abbey appear to know this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My bank used Deutsche bank London and the Abbey used Citibank. I have tried in vain to send Abbey copies of the faxes that show all of the transaction numbers and confirmations but Abbey just keep giving me the speil that they cannot trace incoming payments. They won't even speak to Citibank and are not responding to their requests.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bit about they cannot trace incoming payments is rubbish. When ot went to Deutsche, did they forward this one by CHAPS? If they did and the details were wrong then then they should look at their CHAPS internal account and be able to trace it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right..I if am reading this correctly what you are saying is that as long as the funds were received by Deutsche bank then all of the transactions no matter how many banks were involved would be within the UK, by Chaps, and therefore traceable by any of the parties involved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The funds absolutely have to be traceable under the various maoney laundering regulations. If the Abbey are admitting that they are unable to trace payments such as this, then they're admitting non-compliance with the regs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...