Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Link Financial - Strange Letter


dzaster
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4429 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

long time since I last came here and glad to see everything is still as it was

 

I have today received a letter from Link Financial, see below for text as i dont have a scanner

 

 

Dear Mr XXXXXXXX

 

An application for credit (bank loan, credit card etc) occured in the name of :

 

APPLICANTS NAME : MR XXXXXX

 

This application was at an address different from your own however that address is currently linked to your own home address

 

We ask that you contact our offies to discuss this on 02920 808610

 

Yours Sincerely

 

Robert Barker

 

 

Stupidly I contacted them to find out what this was about as unfortunately I have recently been victim to bank card fraud, where my account was emptied (£200+)

 

They then passed me through to a gentlman called Emmanuel Oliver who started saying I had a debt through GE money and they wanted an immediate settlement.

 

I am now a little worried as I had not known this debt had been passed over to these people and find it strange that just after the bank card issues this letter arrives.

 

As you can imagine I am now a little worried and would appreciate any advice

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Bookmark this link (no pun intended)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?68-debt-collection-library

 

In there is the "prove it" letter should you decide to contact them

 

Do you know of this debt?

If yes, When was the last payment on this debt?

Were you ever defaulted?

Was this account terminated?

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, this will be as a result of 'big brother'. It seems we can do nothing in this day and age that does not spread like wildfire through every computerised system known to man.

 

This may well be part of the 'Security' set up by the Government to allow CRAs to report any activity that could be carried out to claim benefits etc. Not say that this applies to you, but the same system will report all actions.

 

And we think of our financial transactions as private, as has been mentioned elsewhere, only safe place for your private financial dealings is under your mattress:!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this is more like a deliberately misleading letter just to get you to contact them and show yourself. It’s a highly misleading tracing method, and in all probability is based on a lie – it is unlikely any such application was ever made, in my view. It is against OFT guidelines on so many fronts.

 

A debt collector would NOT contact you because an application had been made in your name – it would be absolutely none of their business, and for them to pretend that in some way they have your best interests at heart is absurd. You must complain about this letter to trading standards and the OFT. I think the Information Commissioner’s Office would also love to hear about this.

 

Can you tell us more about the letter? Did it clearly identify Link and what they do? If it wasn’t clear they are a debt collector, then that’s out of order. As silverfox says, the prove it letter is the best first step, but only if they try to contact you further.

 

In short – you’ve been had over. They are getting ever more desperate.

 

It’s pretty clear you’ve not been informed of any assignment too.

Edited by DonkeyB
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had them on the phone trying to get more information from me, I told them to contact me via writing.

 

The strange thing is I am ex directory and my number is blocked from being shown when I do make calls.

 

Will be drafting the 'prove it' letter this morning and also passing the original letter to TS and OFT

Link to post
Share on other sites

not had chance to do anything so far due to work commitments, however this morning I received a letter from asset LINK capital

 

As i dont have a scanner i have typed up the salient information

 

We, Asset Link Capital (No1) limited ("ALC"), hereby give you notice or intimation that effective from 22 February 2007 GE Capital Bank Limited (t/a GE Woodchester) assigned to us the benefit of the debt that you owe them under an agreement with the reference number set out above ("your debt"). We have appointed LINK Financial Outsourcing Limited ("Link Financial") to administer and recover your Debt on our behalf.

 

etc...

 

if we do not recive full payment within 15 days we will instruct a Debt collection Agent or solicitor

 

It then details total amount owed and threatens legal action or bailiffs, judgement on assets/property.

 

My query is simple - is it not the original company who sends the assignment and not the DCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was just about to add exactly the same point – they should have been sending you statements during that time anyway.

 

Sounds like they used a dubious tracing method then sent the letter – you should add this development to your complaints. It pretty much proves what they were doing was against OFT guidelines and misleading.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that you have the info, and they are threatening legal action, you may as well go straight to CPR and flush them out, or send a CCA request to Link and a SAR to the original creditor.

 

I can’t understand why they have waited three years to contact you.

 

Before you move on, can you provide more details about the original account? When did you last make a payment? Did you receive a default notice from GE? (In some cases, GE don’t send DNs but simply sell the debt on; if this is the case, and they have demanded the full balance without first issuing a DN, then they have a problem) Was it a credit card or store card? When did you take it out? Any info would be useful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found this thread online because I have been in an utter panic about receiving the same letter. They sent it to old addresses and my current address, even though I have been in contact with them and they know where I am (although I am disputing my credit agreement or at least I already have an account with them and I am assuming it is about that).

 

What really worried me was I may have another address listed where they can find me, not my address, as I recently got a temporary (very short-term address) and now have been in bits about them coming to the door etc there too.

 

How much information do debt collectors have from your credit file? Also, it has gotten me thinking, do they get to go into government databases like council tax/benefits etc like a previous poster maybe mentioned. Surely they aren't allowed all this access...or are they?

 

I don't know what to make of this letter or why they are sending it to old addresses too.

Edited by moreinfo
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi guys

 

Sorry for not getting back to you for so long, I have been away for work.

 

DonkeyB - really cant remember much about the original account if indeed it is mine, but what i do remember is that i have never had a dn sent from the original creditor (GE Woodchester).

 

Thhings have also moved a bit further forward as I had sent a letter asking them to only contact me in writing and today I received a phone call whilst in the office. This has concerned me quite a bit as now the office receptionist knows I am being chased by a DCA and she is quite a gossip. This could actually put my job in jeopardy

 

i have now reported them to OFT and TS and am awaiting their response. They have advised to keep a log of all calls made by them to me as evidence for a harrasment charge.

 

Dz

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
  • 11 months later...

I also recieved the same style letter from Link, stupidly called them and since have been communicating via email to which they seem to refuse to reply to and only send letters or call. My 'debt' was an old store card - also GE and I never recieved any letters etc from them. Link as per my request have sent me a copy of the contract signed by myself - however it seems was signed incorrectly - I signed the sales assistant box and the sales assistant signed the T&Cs / contractual agreement. Where does this stand me? I

Apparently made 3 payments against the account many years ago approx 5 years - however the account was registered to my parents address (where they still live) and

I never recieved any communication in that

Time period.... Could really do with some help - due to give birth next week and could do without them hassling me. Any advise welcomed?!?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...