Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • I agree
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cancelled Sky Talk & Broadband


SKY ARE A JOKE
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5008 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have had an ogoing dispute and complaint with Sky over the past 23mths, it finally came too a head when the line was cancelled! After numerous calls etc and getting nowhere here is a copy of the complaint letter my partner sent too Sky, does anyone have any more email address that I can bombard them with! See a copy of the email that was sent!!!

:mad2:

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

With reference to the above account:

 

Our telephone and broadband services have been disconnected since the 21st of Septemberthrough a perceived billing issue on your behalf.

 

Over the last week, we have made numerous phone calls to yourselves, and have received conflicting & contradictory information each time.

 

Our perception of the issue is that we have been wrongly charged for a substandard Sky multi-room installation, and (despite rectification by a Sky Engineer on the 1st September) this issue has still not been resolved. At the present time, we estimate we have been overcharged in the region of £38 per month from October 2008, yet you continue to maintain we have an outstanding balance.

 

When a sub-contracted engineer was called out to install the Sky at the end of October 2008, he stated that he was not happy at being expected to climb a ladder to install the dish, despite the fact the installation occurred at a one-storey cottage. He also drilled through a PVC window frame, rather than put himself out to drill through the wall material.

 

On numerous occasions following the installation, my partner has called to ask why we have been charged an additional £38 per month for the last 23 months (apart from January of this year) Each time, she was informed that the multi-room box was not connected to the main telephone socket. Engineers have been out of several occasions to rectify this, and as far as we were concerned the issue was successfully addressed. Still the charges keep coming!

 

As of Wednesday, 22nd September, our balance was £247. A payment was made (on that date) of £127, leaving £120 to bring the account up to date.

 

A direct debit was set up 5 weeks ago in relation to this account. My partner was informed that 2 monthly payments would be taken on the 1st of October as there was not enough time to set up the September payment. On checking the online statement she was found an outstanding balance of £247, hence the online payment of £127.

 

My partner set up a direct debit to ensure that this sum would be cleared on the 1st of October, and yet we are informed that we have made a request for cancellation of both internet and telephone services?

 

Both my partner and myself have spoken to various people from different departments on Wednesday 22nd of September. We have both been informed that our services have been cancelled due to a 3rd party request. Following conversations led to us being informed that this was an automatic procedure following non-payment of an overdue account. On further investigation, this was found to be due to the fact that your systems failed to recognise the online payment and failed to recognise that we have been regularly and erroneously over-charged. We do not consider ourselves to blame for this, nor do we recognise that we are liable for payment of the overcharges. With that in mind, we will be seeking compensation for repayment of the over-charged amounts.

 

Phone calls were also received on Thursday 23rd, and Friday 24th. Again, we have received no clarification as to why our services have been disconnected, and when we can expect them to be re-established.

 

In an attempt to resolve this matter, I personally spoke to a gentleman from the PDS department on Friday, 24th September. During this conversation (with employee reference number AB034, ‘Drew’) I was informed that a Customer Relations Form had been issued, and that we were in fact correct in our statements that Sky was in the wrong in this matter.

 

He then informed me that I would receive a telephone call within 72 hours. Thus far, there has been no follow-up call. My partner was informed this morning that someone had registered a log-in to her account details just after midnight on Saturday, 25th September. I would be very interested to know who this was, and the reasons why? It cannot possibly have been as a result of our contacting you at this time, as my partner was at work, and I was at home with a disconnected telephone line?

 

I would respectfully suggest that someone from your Customer Relations Account contacts us with extreme expediency, and ensures that they have the correct information to hand. We are thoroughly sick & tired of being misled, misinformed, and indeed subjected to outright lies by the representatives we have thus far spoken to, as well as being subject to wrongful denial of service. The responsibility for resolving this matter lies entirely with yourselves, and I expect and demand that we are contacted directly by a member of your staff who is in possession of the correct and true facts of our situation, and who is in a position of seniority sufficient to both give us answers, reconcile our services, and ensure that we are reimbursed for the amounts we have been overcharged.

 

If you continue to treat us with the contempt you have thus far demonstrated, then we will have no hesitation whatsoever in involving the Telecommunications Ombudsman to ensure you have no further opportunity to ignore our complaint!We will also have no hesitation in seeking redress through a 3rd party.

 

Either myself, or the Account Holder ****** *******, can be contacted on either ***** ******, or ***** ******.

 

I anticipate your swift response with regards to this matter

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wh.en you take sky multiroom, the terms and condition place the responsibilty of the telephone line connection onto the account holder, whether engineers can resolve the problem or not.

 

Sky have no obligation to give you back any of the charges or stop them. The only was to stop them is to find a resolution to it or cancel the multiroom.

 

From your opening post, if your account has been clocked due to payments. You only have 21 days from the day the restriction is placed on the skytalk to get the account balance to zero and set up a dd to get the services reinstated. If this is not done then the services will cancel completley. After this if yous till want to have sky services and the account has been cleared then the tv can be reinstated but the skytalk and broadband will need to be reordered from scracth and fees would be required for the these or you can go to another provider.

 

This should have been stated you from the off and any operator you spoke too should know this and agree if you were told any different then there is no need for it.

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...