Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you @BankFodder, your statement is a correct understanding of my position and I agree, it is actually really what I was looking for in starting this thread, as I too believed that the maximum I could claim for is that which I sold it for, even though this was substantially below market value at the time. And so, this sold value is what I shall be claiming for + the other expenses. @dx100uk I get your point, but this is just not what I want to expose myself to. Unfortunately I was one of the unlucky ones to have my details stolen in the Peoples Energy hack, and in 2020 I discovered that those details had been used to take out car insurance, and that the insured was then involved in a collision and my details were dragged through the mud. Despite Aviva cancelling the claim and treating as though it never were, even though I have the letters from them to say that they have removed this claim from the insurance database, I still get refused insurance and credit products to this day until I send across the letter from Aviva which explains that I was a victim of fraud. So you'll forgive me for not jumping up and uploading my data to a server utility for which I have no control over its retention policy, or where the server is located globally, its legal jurisdiction, or its security protocols.
    • Speeding (Revised 2017) – Sentencing (sentencingcouncil.org.uk)  
    • upload sites dont retain copies and so what if they do... what do you think they are going to do, kidnap your grannies budgie or something..how the hell would any of the info required by us be of any use to them..... stop being paranoid and put them all in one mass multipage pdf.  
    • https://audicam.audi.co.uk/customer/6660055/00cc584e9769699ddba3807a2995032f/59022-13062024 Please let me know if you can access footage 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Is there such a thing as a 'self saving' email??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5107 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I am being disciplined at work and it's partly due to an email I received from my sister in September last year. The email was a joke type with several attachments. IT policy was very lax at this point but, following subsequent events in November, it was tightened up. I cleared my computer of everything I felt was against IT policy, especially my inbox, so I'm surprised that this has been found. The very same email was also received by a colleague at the same time and it was still in her inbox too!

 

Could this email have 'saved itself' and why did it not show up in our inboxes?

 

Any help please?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Helford! I don't think that's the case though, if they were looking at all my emails received over that period of time they would have found some pretty offensive stuff!! IT policy WAS really lax. The offending email is really tame-ads for Wallis clothing but there is a topless one of a woman in a bikini whereas in the past I've received full frontal male nudity ones (don't ask). They insist that it was saved in my inbox but I can't imagine saving it for any reason so I put it down to having intended to save the email above or below it and aimed badly but now that my colleague has also been challenged for having it in her inbox it seems too strange??

There are about 500 people where I work and one IT dept so I thought it would be difficult to locate stuff from as far back as sept?

 

What do you think?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't 'save' an email in your inbox, it arrives into your inbox and will stay there if you don't delete it.

 

There are other actions which may affect it though:-

 

1) As pointed out elsewhere, it will probably be held (for a certain period) on an external server, my last job had 'Mail Marshall', that held every email coming in or out, even ones that were blocked and didnt actually reach the recipient.

 

2) You can have auto-archive turned on, that can automatically delete or move emails to an 'archive' (normally on a different server/hd).

 

3) You may have 'Rules' set up that automatically move emails depending on sender, subject, etc to different folders within your email.

 

4) There will no doubt be some backup procedure to duplicate, copy to tape, your emails and/or archive.

 

So at the end of the day, the original email is prob still lurking about somewhere even if you did delete it.

 

NOTE: On top of all this it is also possible to Save an email in a variety of formats.

 

It seems strange that you could be disciplined for receiving a dodgy email, if I were to look in my personal email junk box I'd find all sorts of (unsolicited) unsavoury emails.

 

Emails are often closely scrutenised. A big problem within companies is lack of HD space, if the email in question held images, it may have been quite large and therefore easy to spot or flagged up, if you have 500 staff and they each send/receive a single email of 10mb size, thats 5GB used up already.

 

Andy

Edited by andydd
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy!

 

I'm being disciplined for 'storing' it as opposed to receiving it but think your explanation probably ruins any defence ideas I had!!

 

I know it wasn't in my 'inbox' as I delete everything so I guess I must've saved it somewhere! Drat!!

 

Thanks again

G66

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...