Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car Repossession Urgent Help Please!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5033 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, all got a car through British Credit Trust and stupidly missed some payments without talking to them due to financial difficulties at the time.

 

Repo man appeared today but didn't have the required court order so I refused to hand over the car.

 

I've written to BCT today offering them the normal monthly payment plus an amount towards the arrears that I can actually afford.

 

I am concerned that they will now go away and apply for the court order and come an get the car.

 

Would a court view my offer favourably should BCT refuse.

 

Is there any other way I can tackle this other than wht I have done. My wife needs the car and we can't afford to get another and be paying off BCT should the sell the car at auction.

 

Just to add, this all seemed to start after I wrote to them challenging their arrears charges etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Ok guys update for you. I was contacted by BCTsolicitors and made them an offer of repayment, I received tehir response dated 10th May this morning (21st May) stating that they will accept my offer providing payments are made monthly starting on the 17th and that they obatain a suspended return of goods order from the court.

 

Obvioiusly the 17th has passed and I won't have the money for the 1st payment til I get paid. I have e-mailed the soliciotrs and informed them, of this and asked that they accept payments from my payday and monthly thereafter.

 

One intersting point though is that I have never received a termination notice from them, so can they obtain a suspended return of goods order if I haven't received that notice. I am assuming that they did in fact send one but iut never got to me?

 

Any help or advice would be much appreciated as I am expecting to receive court papers any time soon

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt very much that they have any kind of court order let alone a suspended one!!!

For them to have anything of the sort they would have had to file a claim and you would have had notification from the court to attend a hearing.

 

Have you ever received anything regarding this from the court??

 

You say they haven't sent a termination notice??

For them to have been to court they would have to show that they followed the correct pre action protocol which wouyld involve letters before action, termination notices etc.

 

Have you had anything in writing from these alleged solicitors and have you still got the envelope today's letter came in??

 

Just need to double check that this is a regulted HP agreement and have you paid over a third or is the car parked on your premises??

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've paid over a third and it is a regulated agreement. Envelope got shredded with the other junk. Letter is dated 10th May accepting my offer of payments on the basis that a suspended return of goods order is obtained by them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you get any more letters it'd prob be best if you keep the envelopes cos then you can prove when they were actually sent.

With regard the solicitors I'd suggest you look them up, it's possible they're just an in-house dca for BCT.

 

In my opinion, there'd be very little use in them trying to obtain a ROG order. It'd cost them to make the claim in the first place and when you get to court there's the option for you to agree a repayment schedule whereby you keep the car and continue to pay an agreed amount. BUT.....the agreement is with the COURT and NOT with them AND it will be down to the court to decide a reasonable figure; so you may get the opportunity to make an offer which is LESS than what you have already offered!! As far as I can see the only benefit to them would be that they get to have the car back IF you don't keep up your future repayments; but that's a very big IF and quite an unviable risk for them to take!

I suspect they're banking on you not being aware of your rights, just like a lot of companies do.

However, if you do get court papers then you are still within your rights to ask the court for a time order whereby you can ask for an extension and reduced payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi all, apologies for not requesting this sooner but my computer has been bvroken.

 

Received court papers and acknowledged service stating that I intend to defend. Problem I have now is that my defence needs to be with the court by Friday and I have absolutely no idea how to word it.

 

I am basically defending on the basis that:

 

1. I never received a termination notice (despite one being attached to the court papers)

 

2. The charges levied on the account are unlawful

 

3. Mis-sold PPI

 

4. They have also agreed a repayment schedule but only if they getr a suspended return of goods order, yet they are not asking the court for that order

 

The amounts for the PPI and the charges are way in excess of what they allege my arrears are.

 

Any help with this would be greatly appreciated as I think I am way out of my depth here and don't want to get things wrong and look stupid in front of a Judge.

 

Hearing date is set for 2nd August

Link to post
Share on other sites

They want a return of goods order, although when they agreed my payment offers they said they would be seeking a suspended order, but the paperwork from the court is for the return of goods

Link to post
Share on other sites

They want a return of goods order, although when they agreed my payment offers they said they would be seeking a suspended order, but the paperwork from the court is for the return of goods

It's just my opinion but I think the content of your defence should be more about how you've already tried to negotiate a repayment plan outside of court and so there was no need for a hearing as they haven't complied with pre action protocol; and that they already attempted an illegal repo without a court order.

 

Ideally it would've been better if you'd acknowledged and stated that you wanted time to pay and submit your proposal but not to worry now :)

 

Make sure you gather together all the correspondance that has gone between you so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks I'll go down that route. Is there a specific court form that I use or should it be done on A4 with teh case reference number attached?

 

Also is there a specific way to word it or should it be a general statement type of document?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that if PPI has been missold, charges applied that could be unfair and potentially an unenforceable agreement these should be the backbone of the defence. The fact is that just trying to agree a payment plan that they haven't accepted is not a defence - you are in breach of contract. The illegal repossession is questionable too - they didn't repo, but they did try to encourage you to surrender the vehicle, although no doubt would not have advised you of you rights to apply under Section 129 of the CCA for a time order.

 

In order to get a suspended ROG order then you need to issue for a return of goods order, hence why they've gone down this route. Are you able to post up a copy of the agreement with the necessary personal info blanked out. It may be that with a bit of forcefulness you can get them to back down.

 

Hope that helps

 

MM

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that, I can't post up the agreement at the moment,as my scanner is not working, I'll try and do it tomorrow morning. What parts of it could be unenforcable if not correct?

 

Also does the defence need to be worded specifically on a specific court form, or would a typed A4 sheet be ok with the reference numbe on it?

 

So far my defence consists of:

 

1. The complainant has not adhered to pre-action protocol by issuing the defendant with a termination notice. The defendant puts the complainant to proof that such a notice was sent to and received by the defendant.

 

2. The complainant has already attempted to re-possess the vehicle from the defendant, despite having no legal power or right to do so and at that time failed to advise the defendant of his legal rights under section 129 of the CCA to apply for a time to pay order.

 

3. The defendant is currently in the process of issuing a claim against the defendant for levy of unlawful administration charges and mis-sold Payment protection insurance.

 

4. The claimant has agreed to the defendants re-payment proposals and in light of this, the defendant questions the need for this hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't post up the agreement, but the details on it are as follows:

 

Cash Price of vehicle (including VAT): £6599

Deposit £1000

Total charge for Credit £2393

Arrangement Fee: £240

Option fee £120

Interest £2033

 

 

The original copy of the agreement I have hasn't been signed by anyone other than me.

48 payments of £164

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone tell me if what I've written above is OK, does it need anything else?

 

Are there specific court papers teh defence needs to be filed on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a browse through for a defence template and go from there. If you get stuck pm and I'll email one later today or tomorrow for you to use.

 

Defence seems ok, although could do with some more meat on the bone. When's the hearing?

 

MM

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Morning all, I could really do with some help in beefing up my defence with this.

Court date scheduled for 2nd August.

 

Got statements from BCT solictors today. I checked my bank account and they haven't set up the standing order, so the June payment hasn't been paid.

 

I have sent a cheque for the June and July payment today. Will the late payment go against me in court?

 

Hope someone can help me out with this, I'm starting to get worried!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...