Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
    • Well, it's up to you. Years & years & years ago the forum used to suggest appealing to POPLA, but then AFAIK POPLA's remit was changed and it became much more biased in favour of the PPCs. One of the problems with taking that route is that the onus will fall on you to prove your appeal, while if you do nothing the onus is on MET to start legal action which experience teaches they are very, very reluctant to do. If you go down the POPLA route I would think your ace would be insufficient signage.  Are you able to go back there and get photos of their rubbish, entrapping signs?
    • The first clearly visible sign as you pull in to the car park states “McDonald’s Customers Only 60 minutes” The next clearly visible sign is an almost identical sign outside Starbucks which states “60 minutes free stay for customers only” There are other signs towards the rear of the car park (away from the outlets) that have the terms and conditions on them in very small print.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help recorded delivery letter lost in post


simonetalbot
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6422 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have sent Abbey the final letter before court proceedings but they are saying that they havent received the first letter. I have checked with the post office and they have indeed lost the letter. Does anyone know if I have to give Abbey another 14 days before I take them to court because of this lost letter. The final fourteen days runs out on Monday. I have received the standard reply saying that they will only refund me one charge for customer service but nothing else! so much for their customer service, I am still waiting for a call back from my branch manager and for this refund to be put in my account. Can anyone help with what to do next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the name of fairness (and I know Abbey isn't terribily fair, but we don't want to sink to its level, do we?), it would be best to send a further LBA.

 

Recorded Delivery is a pain in the ar$e. It regularly fails to deliver and what you have now, having used it, is a valid excuse by Abbey that you didn't give sufficient notice. Had you sent by first class, then as with the courts, they would be deemed to have received the notice within 2 working days (someone please correct me if I'm wrong on this point).

 

It's quite academic anyway. The chances of Abbey paying up just because you warn them of impending legal action are slim at best. All you have now is an extra 14 days to wait over what you might have expected before. Plus an extra 14 days interest.

  • Haha 1

Abbey - Won DPA Claim - Aug 06 and got bailiffs in to recover my court costs of just £30.00

Abbey - Won Charges Refund of £1050 - Nov 06

Egg - Recovered £220 due to Customer Services misinformation - Feb 2007

Nat West - Prelinimary Letter to recover on Credit Card charges £30.00 sent March 2006. £25.40 offered - rejected and the bank reckons that this is it's last word on the matter. We'll see if that's still the case when it reads my N1 form sent recently. It has until the 17th April to respond or the N1 will be submitted.

 

Please check out my web site www.BankChargesScandal.co.uk for Research, Useful links and my story.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have started court proceedings on 24th Sept and Abbey have until Oct 9th to respond. So far I have received two standard letters from Abbey which have basically said that they are sorry that I have felt the need to complain etc but offered me nothing, however on Friday I recieved another letter from Abbey which I assummed would be about the pending court action but no it was someone else from Abbey writing to tell me that he could assure me that the regime of charges are not unlawful or even unfair. He pointed out the term and conditions of my account and decided that Abbey are right in taking these charges from me and as a gesture of goodwill he was willing to refund me £787 of the £3000+ I am claiming for. This letter did not mention any court action but I think it is a bit odd that after sending three letters stating my intentions and getting nothing back I now am in receipt of this offer. But the story doesn't end there! I have since been to the bank and this money has already been credited to my account - how will this affect my court action? Do I have to write to Abbey again acknowledging this money but stating that I still intend to follow through with the court proceedings - I did not agree to this money being refunded, will this affect my case? Please help as I only have until a week tomorrow (9th) to sort this out. Is this just another delaying tactic by Abbey. Any help appreicated

Simone

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simone

 

Dont worry, Abbey use this to try to cause you some confusion.

 

Inform the court tomorrow that you have received a gesture of goodwill.

 

Dont alter your claim.

 

BF described a gesture of goodwill to me 'as like a bottle of scotch at Xmas'. In effect its a gift, until or unless they tell you thats is for payment to you for some charges.

 

If it gets to court or when its settled i guess thats the time to argue what the GOGW is about.

 

JMHO

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Glenn. I will contact the court first thing tomorrow. I didn't say earlier but when I ordered a mini statment from the bank it showed the £787 as individual transactions described as FEE REFUNDED for various amounts between £20 and £32. Will this affect my case? Is it likely that Abbey will respond to the court requesting the additional two weeks?

 

Simone

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wold go with what the letter says, if it calls it a gesture of goodwill then thats what i would tell the court it is.

 

Re the two weeks, its more likley they will ask the court for the claim either to be struck out or a stay applied because they havent had enough time to try to resolve the matter.

 

Its likley they would get a stay at least since court is supposed to be the last resort for you.

 

JMHO

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received a bank statement this morning and it appears that Abbey was going to charge me £190 again this month but they have refunded them before I knew that they existed! it seems that these are also part of their GOGW. Abbey keep telling me thay they send a letter out every time for every charge they are going to take - but I have only received one of these letters in the last 10 weeks or so, does this happen to other people? Altogther Abbey have given me £787 as a GOGW only £597 relates to charges already levied on my account and are listed in my court claim. Am I right in assuming that the other £190 credited for these future charges can't be included in Abbey's defence as they don't relate to my case? Any help appreicated

Thanks

Simone

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simone

 

I dont have an account with Abbey any more but as I recall they stopped sending out seperate letters.

 

What they do however is send out statements which includes details of the harges and when they will take them.

 

Thats my recollection anyway, I could be wrong though.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...