Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Taking loan payments when told I couldn't pay


bobhawkes
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6659 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

First came the divorce and all the costs of setting up a new home, suporting my ex for a while (I'm a good guy, really), paying for the kids.... The bank came to the rescue, great! Then came unemployment. I contacted all creditors and explained the situation, Most were willing to suspend interest and accept token payments, except my bank who refused outright to reduce the interest and suggested a reduced repayment that was quite clearly not within my means based on the information I had given them which could be easily verified.

 

Realising that if the regular loan repayment went out of my current account there would not be enough left to live on I tried to stop the standing order. Impossible. The bank continued to make transfers from my current account to the loan account for several months.

 

My question - is this legal? In effect transferring the debt from a low interest loan account to the punitive interest rates of an now overdrawn current account when they had been advised of the situtation? Why should they be able to pay themselves when, had the standing order been to anyone else, they would have to stop it on my instructions?

 

Isn't there a legal requiremet for the bank to minimise its loss resulting from the breach of contract and have they failed to do this? Not to mention their obligations under the Banking Code.

 

The annoying and quite alarming thing is that until the matter was passed to a collection agancy I didn't seem to be talking to anyone who was listening or able to make a decision - just call centre staff reading instructions from the screen. Even then I didn't get to talk to the real decision makers.

 

Of course as the loan repayments continued to be taken there was not enough to pay the direct debits... And the PPI on the loan didn't apply to me even though I had been charged for it in full at day one (not made clear).

 

I'm about to settle the debt but no more than I have to. Advice would be appreciated.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not the expert on here, but one thing concerns me - why was it impossible to stop the standing order? That doesn't sound right to me, I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure the bank can't legally overrule your instructions to stop a standing order. :?:

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I susupect the bank see this as an internal transfer and would claim that this is different to an order to pay a third party.

 

After they refused to change the payment when I phoned I tried to stop the transfer via the internet. It went through as if the transfer was cancelled but the next day it was back and still active.

 

The important point is that if the bank are told that there are insufficient funds and asked to take approriate action they surely have a legal obligation to mimimise their loss arising from the breech of contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you look at your situation from the banks point of view, whether they

pay the loan transfer or not, you will still get clumped £35 or so. It does not change the amount you owe the bank and they won't have to register a loan default on your credit report. And after reading one of Bankfodders postings, I get the impression that it is more serious from a legal standpoint to miss a loan payment than to exceed an overdraft facility.

 

I know it was a horrible situation for you to be in, and I appreciate that to get your current account back in the black, or a nicer shade of red [ie

within the overdraft limit] becomes doubly difficult.

 

At least your loan was coming down and I suppose that for a bank to list that you had missed a loan payment would be a tremendous black mark

against you. Small comfort.

 

I suppose they do it because we so rarely move our accounts to another bank, that they do not feel they have a duty to offer a service. For

instance, some time ago I needed an unexpected repair to my car, and

my salary was not due in the bank for another couple of days. I asked

my garage [where I was a regular customer] if they could hold my cheque for a couple of days-which they did without charge.Contrast that

with my bank who I have banked with for considerably longer than I have dealt with the garage.I qsked them to delay payment of a standing order for two days.They refused and said they would charge me £25 I think if

there were insufficient funds. I cancelled the standing order and reinstated it two days later. But look at the difference in attitude between the two businesses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/07/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6659 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...