Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • she and  johnson need to be kicked off the taxpayers credit card - for starters I'm certain there is cause - taking up 'jobs' when they shouldn't, bringing the nation into disrepute with their antics .. I'm sure it would be a very popular act from a new labour guv
    • Please have a look at this draft letter. It is modelled on yours but I have cut out a load of the unnecessary information. Also, the responsibility lies with the finance company because the vehicle was brought on hire purchase. You send it to them and a copy to big motoring world.   Let us know if there's anything that you disagree with, which is wrong, which you think should be added
    • According to Alastair Campbell on Twitter, anti-Le Pen parties are pointing to RN's fiscal policies and saying they'll cause a 'Truss-style market meltdown'. Liz Truss charged taxpayers for Amazon Prime subscription - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK The subscription costing £95 gives the ex-PM free shipping from the retail giant, as well as the ability to stream films and TV shows such as My Fault...  
    • Thank-you @BankFodder, your statement is a correct understanding of my position and I agree, it is actually really what I was looking for in starting this thread, as I too believed that the maximum I could claim for is that which I sold it for, even though this was substantially below market value at the time. And so, this sold value is what I shall be claiming for + the other expenses. @dx100uk I get your point, but this is just not what I want to expose myself to. Unfortunately I was one of the unlucky ones to have my details stolen in the Peoples Energy hack, and in 2020 I discovered that those details had been used to take out car insurance, and that the insured was then involved in a collision and my details were dragged through the mud. Despite Aviva cancelling the claim and treating as though it never were, even though I have the letters from them to say that they have removed this claim from the insurance database, I still get refused insurance and credit products to this day until I send across the letter from Aviva which explains that I was a victim of fraud. So you'll forgive me for not jumping up and uploading my data to a server utility for which I have no control over its retention policy, or where the server is located globally, its legal jurisdiction, or its security protocols.
    • Speeding (Revised 2017) – Sentencing (sentencingcouncil.org.uk)  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Heres a new way to attack the problem?


KPRHERO
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5349 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok so if I have one question...

 

Virgin media applied a £150.00 credit to my account without my knowledge or permission, they then charged me for it two months later and have cut me off.

 

Now as far as I am concerned they didn't ask me permission, and I didn't request the money in any kind of credit agreement, so do I really have to pay it back?

 

I'm looking at it as Virgin gave me free money which I didn't ask for, would you pay it back?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/digital-tv-services/225325-virgin-tv-saga-continues.html That is the original link....

Edited by KPRHERO
Link to post
Share on other sites

C'mon on.

 

The money was never yours, and never will be. It would have been applied to your account in good faith, and then reversed once it was found an error was made. If you didn't pay in this amount, or were due a credit of this amount by them, then the money has gone to the place it was expected to in the first place. You cannot claim 'ownership' of the credit due to an administrative error.

 

If you spent the money, then they'll take you to court for it, and you'll lose as the money can never be yours under those circumstances. Using expressions like no 'permission' is poinless, it just has no relevance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres the thing, I don't have an issue with paying it back, I got my head around the situation and understood why they did what they did, but, it was when they cut my services and refused to put it back on unless I paid them before the grace period was up that got my back up.

 

I've now got to go for weeks without having any cable because they applied the credit this way, i made an offer of payment, and they refused to accept it, so that is why I want to tell them to take a running jump.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still don;t have an understanding of your situation, but if it helps - your services are removed automatically (without human intervention) the CSS system talks to the billing system, which in turn is connected to the customer validation processes. The time clock to disconnection starts from when the bill is issued. The days tick down and you get closer to suspension, until/unless the billing system reports a credit. This shuts down the timer, until next month.

 

As I found out, it's nothing personal.... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to say after being ignored by Virgin I have sent off a final letter to warn them I will be walking away from the contract, only this time I have suggested they read thier own terms and conditions which state the following:

 

You can cancel your agreement with 30 days notice in writing on the condition that you are affected for the following reason (see J3 on the Virgin Terms and Conditions):

 

"We (Virgin) make significant changes to the services so the services you are entitled to receive in return for the charges you pay are significantly altered or reduced."

 

Game Check Mate.

 

Virgin significantly reduced my services due to a change they applied on my account. I win. Hooray for me ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah - the key word here is 'significant'. They'll have to agree that there has been a significant (and detrimental change to your costs) for a cancellation.

 

What will happen is you will seek cancellation, and stop paying. They will disagree (and probably not tell you). You then get a CRA default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An update:

 

Virgin phoned me tonight, I refered them to the clause in the contract, and the fact that I was never behind with the bill, just over thier credit amount, which was thier fault, and that although I didn't want to leave them, it was thier fault for such soddy service.

 

We went back and forth for ages and finally the guy on the end of the phone agreed that I should have been given more time to pay the bill, and said that there will be a call from him tomo morning when he had more time (it was almost the end of his shift) and he would give a final yes or no to applying a credit to my account to restore services, on the agreement I would pay the outstanding balance in full over a set agreed period of time.

 

I don't believe him, but we will see.

 

Can anyone direct me to any legal reference in regards to virgin being able to apply and take away credits on my account without my permission? I can't see anything in thier terms and conditions, and finding it through google etc is a nightmare, I can't find a thing! ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no issue of 'permission' for credits to your account - simply that the account should reflect the status of your dealings with the company in an accurate manner. If there are errors, as it is their system, they can modify the system to reflect the correct status (as they see it). You have no input into this, except to complain or point out their errors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...