Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

URGENT HELP! Child Support Agency


jimmyjammer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5384 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm not too sure if this is the correct section, hopefully it is.

 

I'm hoping that someone here will be able to give me some pointers regarding arrears and the child support agency.

Basically I received a call back in Feb saying I had arrears of a couple of hundred pounds, and after numerous previous problems with them I just decided to go for an easy life and promptly paid what they were asking. I was then told that my account was all up to date and there were no further arrears outstanding, and as I was on a nil assessment I wouldn't have any further dealings with them unless my circumstances changed.

 

Then roughly 6 months later (August).......I received a phone call out of the blue from someone from the debt enforcement team telling me I had arrears outstanding for a few thousand pounds. I told him I had paid arrears back in Feb and as far as I was aware there must be some mistake. He basically went on to say that it looked like someone had suspended arrears when the account changed over from the old system to the new one...........but I had never been informed of any arrears or suspension. I have since received a breakdown of my account and from what sense I can make of it, it seems that there was a period between 1998-1999 they were requesting payments that in total are close to the amount of arrears that they are now seeking. My problem is in the fact that I have no memory of what was happening so long ago or what my circumstances were at that time.

 

I am also wondering if in fact they can pursue me for any arrears (if any) after telling me in Feb I was clear and up to date.

 

I am at a total loss as to what to do next, I have always complied with the CSA, and never tried to avoid them......but the fact that they are seeking such an amount now has me worried sick. I dont know if this is relevant but at the minute I am on a NIL assessment.

 

Please post any help or advice that you may have, and thankyou.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to run the helpline for NACSA and advise people with CSA problems, but havent been doing it for a few years so am a little out of touch.

With regards to arrears from 1999, there is a statute of limitations which says they cannot pursue a debt over 6 years old, though they can still do a DEO for the amount. Thats how I got mine cancelled, but it depends if you have acknowledged them in the last 6 years or not.

 

The advise I would give you is contact NACSA, they have experts who can check not only your assessment but also your arrears are correct, they are all volunteers but VERY knowledgeable.

I dont know if Im allowed to supply the link but its

www.nacsa.co.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...