Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Private Parking Code of Parking has been postponed as the poor dears are frightened that thew will all go out of business once it becomes Law. We all wish but nothing could be further from the truth so doubtless most of them will have to change their ways if they don't want to be removed as approved parking companies. Thank you for still retaining and producing the original PCN which, no surprise, fails to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. [It even states the vehicle "breeched" the terms  when it was the driver that allegedly breached the terms}. It fails to specify the Parking Period and whilst it does show the arrival and departure ANPR times on the photographs [that I cannot read] they do not include how long you actually parked nor was it specified on the Notice  [photos don't count]. So that means that you spent even less time parked though it would help had you not blocked out the dates and times, so good if you could please include them on your next  post. Pofa  asks the driver to pay the charge S( [2][b] which your PCN doesn't though they do ask the keeper to pay.and they have missed out theses words in parentheses S9[2][f] ii)  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; All of those errors mean that the cannot transfer the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now responsible . What a rubbish Claim Form -doesn't even give the date of the event which it should.  
    • it doesn't matter what you are being charged or if you missed the discount period. you ain't paying anyway..... if this ever gets before a judge. then the ins and out of POFA2012 or any IPC/BPA guidelines might come into play. until then i go get on with your life. you are spending far too much time on a speculative invoice scan scheme  its almost as if you believe these are fines and enforceable in a criminal court and you could have bailiffs at your door any minute.    
    • Debt Respite Scheme (Breathing Space) guidance - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) but dont get scammed into a DMP. simply tell whomever you call to simply apply for the BS for you.  
    • totally immaterial. time to now start reading up. Programmable Search Engine (google.com) Clickme^^^ do not miss your defence filing date no matter what dx  
    • Programmable Search Engine CSE.GOOGLE.COM clickme^^
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Flinty against Forthright Finance


flinty_1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6395 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have started a new thread here as I has posted in the wrong forum. Royal Bank of Scotland. For that my Sincere Apologies.

Today I have filed the Form N1 with the County Court.:D I was only originally claiming £380ish but with charges and costs that I have since incurred the actual total has risen to over £700. They should have offered more than £160 and closure of my account. The very nice bloke in the Court office guided me through the one mistake on my form under the Value section.

He also told me what would be happening now and over the next 14 days.

These people have angered me with their arrogance with my requests for a refund. I have even been served with a Default notice demanding the goods back. This arrived before the offer of £160 and account closure.:o Naturally I refused this, would rather lose the whole claim if I could actually get these A*** holes into court, in fact I look forward to the day when I will be sat in the waiting room and seeing thier solicitor SWEAT.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done you!! I hope you get exactly what you want and more if possible. I am close on your heels, I have sent DPA letter today so let's hope the statements come back soon and then I can put my case forward also. Shame we can't claim for harrassment, stress and bullying isn't it?

How long do you have to wait now and do you think it will actually get to court or do you think they'll settle before?

;) Boobaby

Please hit the scales if you think I've helped!

Please note that advice given is purely my opinion and should be treated as such.

FAQ’s

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

HSBC Claim - August 2006 £2,700 paid November 2006

Halifax Claim - August 2006 £4,100 paid December 2006

GE Capital - August 2006 - settled

Log Book Loans - August 2007 - sorted

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that they will settle before we go into court. As for the time frame, all I know is that the 14 days is ticking that the Court gives them to respond. The court officer said that the papers would More than likeley be posted the same day and they give them 2 days to in effect 'Be Served'. That would make it Saturday so the earliest I could win is 14 days from Monday. I suspect though that they will offer a defence just because all of the people that I have spoken to on the phone, Do not really Give a SH*T and are arrogant as anything.

Will keep posting as and when anything developes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

) a declaration from this honourable court that the term of the contract leading to the application of the charges is unenforceable;

 

I have put this in my claim against Forthright.

Bankfodder said to include if you felt lucky

I am actually wondering what it exactly means?

 

Papers where served and they have until the 30th to respond.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have contacted the court today and received the reply that they themselves are about 5 YES 5 :o days behind with their paperwork. GRRRR.:mad: Any way as far as the Guy could tell Forthright had not yet filed a defence but please ring again Friday.

 

I will be most annoyed though if no defence is offered as I wanted to see somebody Sweat in the Court room, still time yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi flinty,

im expecting my statements 2morrow lol, or non complience letter going in, Im lucky in that my account was paid in full and closed over 2 years ago roughly, so they cant threaten me with anything, Im looking forward to taking these lot all the way.

Good Luck anyway, Ill be watching your thread.

Brecken x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Yes there is news.

 

As expected they have failed to file a defence. This is a shame as I really wanted them in court. However, the good news is hopefully the judge will just agree and the part about the agreement being unlawful as regards the charges might allow me to attempt to claim the whole amount paid to them over the term of the agreement but that will be another fight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Flinty

A usefull contact for you

 

Paul Sherwood

Litigation Controller

Legal liason Unit

 

Phone 01224 694890

Fax 01224 695427

 

Good luck and please keep us informed

 

j

You may think that but . . ......

____________________________________

Total repaid to date £1947.58

 

Lloyds Currrent a/c £745.27

Moneyclaim filed 17th June

Defence and AQ 25th July. Case struck out 11 Aug

reinstated and hearing 15th Jan 2007

 

Lloyds loan a/c D A request expired 19th June

Proceedings under S7 Data Protection Act issued 29th June defence and counterclaim 27 July

Hearing Jan 3 2007

Listed final hearing April 2007-

Judge declared an interest and disqualified himself

new date to be set

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Unfortunately received the paper work back today, I FORGOT TO TICK ONE BOX.

 

When I wanted paying.

I have rang the court and was told that Judgement will be made upon receipt of the correctly marked paper work.

Will then start Demanding immediate payment from them just as they did with me when I WAS STRUGGLING TO MAKE PAYMENTS. One last point, trhe original payment that I wanted them to refund was Roughly £500. This has risen to £740 with costs and interest and my time. They should have paid earlier and been a lot politer on the phone. Luck every body.

Link to post
Share on other sites

our almost there Flinty. If they dont pay in 14 days you can ask for a warrent.

When I issued one against them it almost crossed their payment in the post, but they sent the cost of it whithin a few days.

 

The only odd thing: The bailliff reported that they are not at the City Road address it is apparantly empty!

 

Good hunting

 

 

J

You may think that but . . ......

____________________________________

Total repaid to date £1947.58

 

Lloyds Currrent a/c £745.27

Moneyclaim filed 17th June

Defence and AQ 25th July. Case struck out 11 Aug

reinstated and hearing 15th Jan 2007

 

Lloyds loan a/c D A request expired 19th June

Proceedings under S7 Data Protection Act issued 29th June defence and counterclaim 27 July

Hearing Jan 3 2007

Listed final hearing April 2007-

Judge declared an interest and disqualified himself

new date to be set

Link to post
Share on other sites

I Have WON:D :cool: :grin: :wink:

 

Recieved judgement today dated 2/10 for tne full amount.

Will be contacting Forthright in due course about their MISSING payment, that will be fun!!!.:grin: :grin:

 

I will be donating 5% to this fantastic site. Without it I would not now be celebrating winning a case in the County Court about money. It is really nice to be the aggressor in court and not the worried hard working person that gets penalised when payments are late or missing.

 

Thanks to every body that helps to run and keep this site running. I Will update this thread when I start to Harrass them (Next week I think) and when full and final payment is made.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Have some BAD news.

 

Even though I have won the District Judge that has reviewed my application he has ruled that I need to make an,

 

"Application on notice"

 

for the following two points to be considered at a further £65

 

One was about the agrrement being unlawful

the other was about getting Forthright to remove the default trhat they have registered against me.

 

Will have a serious think and read some more before making the decision.

 

Will contact Forthright tomorrow about my money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a SURPRISE.:o

 

Forthright have not recieved any papers from the court relating to my claim. The nice lady became very abrupt when I said that I had obtained Judgement and wanted my money. She gave me a number to ring at the legal liason dept and promptly hung up before I could confirm the number.

 

Thankfully I had got it right and another nice lady seemed very Surprised that I had already got a Judgement against them as there was no record of it. She did ask nicely if I could Fax the judgement over to them and she would get back to me by Monday. I agreed on the principle that I would not be waiting any longer than Monday before getting the Bailiffs involved.

 

Must say however, that it was very enjoyable upsetting the 1st Very nice lady as it was her kind that use to threaten me when a payment was late. They say that revenge is sweet.

 

There will be more on Monday

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to send the Bailiffs in YET.

 

Gave them a friendly reminder that the clock was ticking and I wanted a reply by the end of today. Again was given the sob story that they had recieved no paper work:confused: and the 1st that they knew about it was me ringing on Friday. Reminded her that I had the Judgement and I expected a reply Today or I would be taking further action which would result in Bailiff costs and a days earnings that I would have lost by taking a day off to arrange it. Less than an hour later I recieved a phone call from them stating that the Cheque would be raised today and that I should recieve it by the end of the week.:grin: I said thankyou but non-receipt by Friday would see further action being instigated first thing Monday morning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...