Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

court summons for benefit fraud. please help.


mollymae
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4735 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

There are quite a few other threads regarding this kind of thing, have you read them?

 

You can search for these similar threads by clicking on 'Search' on the blue bar, then 'Advanced Search'. Then in 'Search by Key Word' type 'fraud' and under 'Search in Forums' highlight 'Benefits, Tax Credits [etc]'.

 

Finally, click 'Search Now'. This narrows you to 9 pages of threads and you can pick the most promising ones from there.

 

There is bound to be useful information for you in some of the threads.

 

Magistrates' Courts

 

I've recently visited our local magistrates' court a few times to help a friend. I know that the magistrates respond well to honest testimony and are reasonable and sympathetic people.

 

Make sure that your solicitor knows about your admission of guilt, children, depression and any other mitigating factors.

 

It is highly unlikely that you will be given a custodial sentence.

 

Newspapers

 

Local papers don't often cover the magistrates' courts. To them, a case such as your of admitted benefit fraud would be of little interest and the odds they would report it are very slim.

 

* * *

 

I know you are thinking the worst, but I'm sure things will go well for you in court and the magistrates be lenient. Good luck for Tuesday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The important thing will be what your solicitor tells the court. From what you have written, the main points he might cover are:

 

1. You did some occasional work for a friend and made the mistake of not declaring it. Likewise, with your husband's modest pay rise.

2. You admitted your fault at the IUC and apologised.

3. You have already made an agreement with the council to pay the money back.

4. You have been paying it back for the last 5 months.

5. The solicitor might then question why it has been necessary to summons you to court, since you have already made an agreement to repay the money, and have honoured that agreement.

6. You are very sorry for what you have done.

7. You are the mother of three young children, including twins.

8. You have suffered depression and worry over what has happened.

 

If you think these points are helpful then jot them down for the solicitor. He will have his own ideas, of course, and represent your case as he thinks best.

 

Anyhow, good luck in court.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, so it's a civil action brought against you by the council and this hearing is to determine whether the case goes any further.

 

Your solicitor might therefore stress that you have admitted your fault, reached an agreement with the council to repay the money, that you have honoured that agreement, and at all times you have co-operated with the council.

 

These might then be grounds for saying that a prosecution is unnecessary and not in the public interest. He might also mention the very short notice you were given for appearing in court.

 

Your solicitor, of course, will have more experience to determine the best course, but I would not rule out challenging the case to prosecute you. See what he thinks.

 

Sorry I didn't reply earlier. Was busy all morning. Good luck in court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...