Jump to content


Photoman V Scottish Power


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5355 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Photoman, I too think Scottish Power are a disgrace and think what they have done (above) is reprehensible.

 

I think it will be quite fitting if you use the DURKIN case to claim damages from Scottish Power for the default . That would have a nice ring of schadenfreude about it don't you think?

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you leave it to the Court's discretion, then the court should issue it an "unspecified amount" claim.

 

If you are intending to add a clause like 4/ (above) then you should be mindful of the limits to keep the claim in SCT as if it goes fast track, then all bets are off as far as costs are concerned.

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This simply means writing to the Court manager saying that you agree to an extension of the timescale for the defendants defence,to allow settlement didcussions to continue.

 

CPR 15.5(2) requires that any agreement between the parties to extend the time for filing a defence must be notified to the court by the defendant.

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...