Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

please help!!!


ben1305
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5346 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

do one of these free online credit checks in your case

that is if you have no past debt hiding in the closet

 

if the ccj was over six years ago, they would be very hard pressed to get any court to enforce it now it has droped off your credit file

but needs to be confirmed

 

send the dca the telephone harrasment letter to begin with

 

 

send them this

 

Harassment by telephone

 

Account Number: XXXXXXX

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls. (Delete if necessary)

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only.

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded. (**Even if you don‘t yet have recording equipment!!**)

__________________

 

 

my feelings on this is the dca have no chance

not even a court option

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats the way to deal with them

from now on keep a log of the calls

record them if you can, you are allowed to and not tell them

 

send recorded delievery

 

let me know asap if the ccj or default if any is off your credit file

 

they are realy chancing there arm this lot

prob got the account for pennies knowing they have no chance to enforce or collect

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank my old pal cyber for this:-)

 

AFAIK whoever owns the debt has to apply for enforcement, but I seem to remember reading somewhere that if a DCA buys a debt which has a CCJ they have to enforce it within 6 months, no doubt someone will correct me.

forumbox_top_left.gifforumbox_top_tile.gifforumbox_top_right.gifforumbox_left_tile.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats the point

it seems the ccj is over six years old

they would need the permission of the court to enforce

as its been so long

no chance

 

thats why welcome have floged it to the dca

 

as stated

if a dca does not start enforcement action with in 6 months of the debt assignment

 

they can then swing for it

Link to post
Share on other sites

me thinks getting well ahead of our self on this one

 

did you get a n1 county court claim

have you had any paperwork from a court

 

welcome are very big on saying they have issued a claim

 

most of the time its bs

 

do you , or have you had at any time correspondants to say you ever had a ccj

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi sam

 

i hope you dont mind me butting in

 

you seem to be handling this fine

 

i think that women from jb is just working of a script and doing the mind game number ben

 

i think a recorded put up or shut up letter is now needed

a petition for bankrupcy would be through the court, then the or would be involved

 

its obviouse jb are being naughty

 

see what comes back ref the statute barred template, if they ignore that and fail to give a response, we will go for the throat

 

its clutching at straws time for jb me thinks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

thats being on line for about five minutes then all the software getting deleated from my usb dongle

 

had a very nasty virus

even a reformat had problems

 

ended up getting a new pc

 

back on line now though and have got to you on my long list

 

regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...