Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If there is a whitelist and few intruders there only seems the residents to make money from. It would leave wondering what the incentive was for the MAs if there was nothing in it for them except the obvious complaints from the residents. Not that I am saying that they are getting a backhander but there seems little other reasons unless they are trying to show how well run the place is managed-not. If they ran it properly there would be no need for OPs.
    • we're much better. pers i'd stat fighting back with debt, as if you don't you will never be rid of it. you've already most probably extended the life of all your debts by another 6yrs by going the IVA route, because the IVA will fail..they always do. these providers always find some reason at the end of the 5yrs to extend it by inventing some weird and wonderful schemes like sell our mates your equity in your home before we will say it's finished and sign you off. despite all the bluff and bluster these companies come out with, there is really very very little legal wise they can do to you id you tell them to go......and stop paying and ignore them. as i said a few postback im really shocked you fell for the IVA and are now falling for more bluff and bluster and thats why you are in the state you are in. by the way. i was going to ask Credit Expert are a credit file company, are you sure they are the ones Hanover have got to pressure you? doesn't sound like their remit to me, 1st ive heard of a CRA company winding up debtors for a fee. can you dump all these emails into a PDF file after redaction so's we can see.? read upload dx    
    • now do you want help or just come here to rant at the 1st chance. is this indictive of why you have this issue with BG? there isn't one really just you being pedantic? now give us a chance to decide lets have some info. we don't accept .jpg picture files as they are displayed directly to screen whereby anyone members or not can see them, hence we require a multipage pdf properly redacted. theres a good upload guide to read on that. so ball is your court... we still would help our worst enemy regardless . dx
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Urgent: Recieved Possesion Claim


themonster
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5419 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok monster, I will try to help as well.

 

Judging from the documentation, you are in arrears with the mortgage and the lender has taken you to court to secure a possession order for those arrears.

 

First things first, a possession order does not mean eviction straight away, it is an order for possession of the property but it can be suspended in different ways.

 

Secondly, can you pay the mortgage? what is the reason for the arrears and is there a likelihood that you can pay them?

 

PM me if you want

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can i request that the person who set the agreement up, be present in court. As he is obviously mis informing his solicitors & they do not know the what they are writing.

 

 

Hmm, unlikely, unless you are actually disputing the terms of the possession order.

 

Given you are making a proposition to pay the interest and an amount from the arrears the judge is likely to look favourably on this and also that you are trying to sell the land, he will want to know why Yorkshire bank wants to repo?

 

It may be that they don't but just want an order to strengthen their position with you.

 

When did you make the offer and have they refused it and said why?

 

As to the person who set up the agreement, the possession hearing is not that type of hearing, they'll send a representative, probably not even a solicitor, you will need to attend.

 

If you choose to defend the action, you will need to lodge a defence, careful as this can be costly if you lose as you could find yourself out of pocket for Yorkshires cost as well.

 

The particulars of claim you say are wrong, do you have the paperwork to back that up? Whats the date of the signed mortgage deed and the offer that went with it.

 

You could dispute it but be aware this is a technicality and often viewed as a stalling tactic.

 

The important bit to me is your proposal, if you are covering the interest and offering to decrease the arrears until sale, there isn't really any reason for them to enforce the order, more likely they will agree an SPO (suspended possession order) on this basis. That means you will keep paying on the proposition you've put forward until either the debt is paid or you sell, depending on what you put forward.

You must keep up those payments though, if you fail, they have the right to enforce the order, which means they don't need to go to court again, they just apply for a warrant from the bailiff to reposess. You can try to get that held off with an application but unless at that stage you look to reduce the arrears substantially, most companies won't listen.

 

All told I would suggest contacting them with the proposition and seeing what they say.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok i am filling in the defence form, and am stuck on question 6.

 

"Do you intend to apply to the court for an order changing the terms of your loan agreement (a time order)?"

 

There is no repayment plan agreed between the parties when the nil payments ended so i don't know how to answer.

 

 

The short answer is no you are not applying for a time order, that's a very specific piece of legislation which alters the terms of the contract so you agree to repay over a fixed period or give up the security, carry on with the rest of the form.

 

Simply filing a defence often gives companies time to pause and pass you to the defended litigation team who may listen a tad more than the normal collection peeps.

 

Meph

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...