Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5476 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

thanks for having a look and seeing if you can help me :)

 

yesterday morning i opened the door to a bloke from bristow and sutor. i let him in (wouldnt normally but id not long had a seizure so i wasnt to alert at this point) i owe 400 pound for council tax and their fees. this has been accrued since april of last year until around november when i got housing benefit. the bloke walked round my house and listed the possesions, but i had informed him none of the stuff (except xbox 360) was mine as i rent fully furnished. he said ok thrust papers in front of me which i naively signed (walking possesion notice)

 

The fees are as follows:

Council tax - 339.35

attendance to levy fee 24.50

levy fee - 35

walking possesion fee 12

redemption of goods fee 24.50

total - 435.35

 

what can they actually do now? im unemployed and am also bankcrupt ( iwas declared bankrupt on 22/04/08 but my council tax is not included in my bankrupcy as its been accrued since.

 

any help would be much appreciated.

 

gary

Edited by gkh_1985
added fees
Link to post
Share on other sites

right send a copy of your tenants agreement to bailiffs tell them they have an invalid levy as you own nothing in the property tell them you explained this to attending bailiff and showed him a copy of you tenancy agreement but he still went ahead with the walking possession agreement ask them to remove all charges connected with this

 

write to council and ask them to take the account back from bailiffs explain about the unlawful levy(include copy of letter you sent to bailiffs and copy of tenancy agreement ) and ask them to take payments direct from j s a

sorry i don't know anything about bankruptcy

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would say it should make no difference as you are not signing a credit agreement

 

perhaps it would be a good idea to post that question in the bankruptcy section best place get an answer i would have thought

 

i wouldn't mind knowing the answer myself in case someone else asks

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would also put in your letter to the council that because of your bankruptcy the bailiff has refused to enter into an payment agreement this is another reason to get payments taken from JSA

 

 

have a read of this its why the bailiff does a walking possession agreement

if he wont enter into a payment agreement why has he done a walking possession agreement

 

(3) An authority takes close or walking possession of goods for the purposes of head D of the Table to paragraph 1 if it takes such possession in pursuance of an agreement which is made at the time that the distress is levied and which (without prejudice to such other terms as may be agreed) is expressed to the effect that, in consideration of the authority not immediately removing the goods distrained upon from the premises occupied by the debtor and delaying its sale of the goods, the authority may remove and sell the goods after a later specified date if the debtor has not by then paid the amount distrained for (including charges under this Schedule); and an authority is in close possession of goods on any day for these purposes if during the greater part of the day a person is left on the premises in physical possession of the goods on behalf of the authority under such an agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...