Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

What next after a default?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5453 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

What is the legal status of the account during this period?

 

In Default, if you have received/they claim to have sent a DN. Delinquent otherwise.

Will the original credit agreement still be valid (assuming its all in order) or it is considered as ended?

 

Still valid, until you receive a demand for the full oustanding balance payable (past arrears and future payments). A termination notice, Final demand or Court claim should be considered as termination.

It is my opinion that termination notices have been replaced with arrears notices. Therefore, the agreements will endure for as long as there are arrears.

 

Is the creditor obliged to give you a default notice if you miss several payments or they can choose not to?

 

The original default usually results in the issuance of a default notice.

Should the debtor make an arrangement to pay at a reduced level, the creditor can issue a second default notice when the amount due at the reduced level, is equal to 3 months missed payments at the original level.

The creditor should report the default(s).

 

What options does a creditor have once the default 'falls off' the debtors credit file after the '6 year sentence'?

 

If the account is still running (being paid) - anything they like.

If the account was terminated - nothing after 6 years, so long as there has been no acknowledgement (letter or payment for 6 years) of the debt.

 

Bill

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi carrs,

 

Does this mean then that for as long as the account is running, the creditor has the permission to process your data

 

Yes, and a further 6 years after the account is closed.

 

Also can they re-default after the default 'falls off' the credit files

 

(It takes 6 years to "fall off"!!)

 

Yes, if there is still an amount outstanding, and the debtor is still repaying it but misses further payments (as described above).

 

Bill

Edited by Bill Shidding
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

A creditor issues you with a default notice and you make arrangements for reduced payments through a debt management company

 

I understand that is Payplan/cccs or similar.

 

 

What is the legal status of the account during this period

 

So long as the agreement is enforceable, title remains with the OC.

 

Bill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Agreement cases have been the subject of much debate on the legal issues forum (where I usually go). A Judge recommended that these cases should be subject to "carefully selected test cases" in a higher court. DCAs have jumped on this as a reason to pursue disputed debts. However, it appears that the Judge was actually referring to the subject of data processing where the agreement was disputed.

You can read the thread in the legal forum if you wish.

 

Regards

 

Bill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi postggj

 

an account can only be defaulted once, even if you are still paying a dca who now own the account

 

Ok, if you default on the original agreement, fail to make any repayment/arrangement or the debt is farmed out. You are correct.

There is further guidance on when the debt is sold on.

 

Op has entered into an arrangement through a debt management company, and has therefore rescheduled the agreement.

This is done either formally or informally.

 

Data Protection Technical Guidance.

Filing defaults with credit reference agencies.

Version 3 02/08/2007

 

Chapter 18 Formal rescheduling of the agreement.

 

This involves a formal and permanent rescheduling of the payments due on the account. It might include capitalisation of part of the debt; it may extend the length of the loan; it may change the level of payments. This adjustment may take the form of a new agreement or a change to the original agreement.

If a new account is set up for the customer then the original account should be shown on the credit reference file as settled, with the correct payment history shown up to the time of rescheduling.

If the repayment history shows missed payments (a default) then there is still a defaulted account showing on the file, but it is settled. It does not wipe the original default.

 

If the rescheduling results in changing the original agreement, the correct payment history up to the time of rescheduling should again be shown, but in this case the credit reference file will not show the account as settled. ****Information filed after the rescheduling should reflect payments and the terms of the modified agreement.****

In this instance, the original default stays. If you again miss payments, you get a second default.

 

Chapter 19 Informal rescheduling of the agreement.

 

This is where the lender agrees to reschedule the terms of the agreement for the medium to long term but anticipates that the customer will return to the original level of payment on the account.

 

The credit reference file should record the correct payment history up to the time of rescheduling.

If in default, the default will remain.

The account should be marked to show a new arrangement has been made, and reflect the modified repayment terms.

Any record of monthly payments after the reschedule should reflect payments made against the modified agreement.

If rescheduled agreement is defaulted, two defaults on one modified account.

Where a rescheduling of this type breaks down, a default may be filed when the total value of the arrears is equivalent to three monthly payments under the original terms. However, this should not result in the customer being placed in a worse position than someone who has made no effort to pay whatsoever.

Quite how they differentiate between cant pays or wont pays, is not elaborated on!.

 

I hope this explains my reasoning. However, this guidance can be complicated in the extreme.

I expect any reader of this post now knows more about default guidance than most DCAs:).

 

Bill

Edited by Bill Shidding
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi postggj

 

i am awaiting confirmation but ime sure that once a default drops off your credit file, thats it, a dca cant put another default on your credit file

 

If a DCA has bought the debt, then the original account should be marked as settled and closed (any default will remain for 6 years).

The *NEW* DCA account can be defaulted, should 2 consecutive repayments be missed. Although some firms like to use 1 missed payment to serve a default notice:rolleyes:.

You cant be defaulted twice for missing the same payment ie July 2008.

 

Bill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi postggj

 

If the debt is "sold on" you are correct. You must AGREE to a repayment plan.

Whether you have to sign a new agreement depends on if they have the original (enforceable) one. If they dont have one, who would sign it?

 

(Are we talking about the OPs position, postggj ?)

 

Bill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Before a DCA would contemplate a repayment programme instead of "going for the b*lls". Surely the DCA would insist on seeing a completed Income and Expenditure schedule, mainly to ensure they receive maximum instalments (profit).

This would be before they agree to allow any repayment programme?

However, any DCA that allows an account to remain unpaid that long (acknowledged or not) IMHO CANNOT have a CCA for it. If they did, they would have filed a claim a long time ago for the whole balance.

 

Bill

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...