Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Housing Benefit - first payment to landlord


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5509 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

First payment was made to landlord. The rules seem to say that this happens when there is a delay with first payment. Landlord is very unhelpful and has returned the cheque to the Council. My rent has not been in arrears as i found money through credit (ouch!).

 

Council has said they will issue first payment to me if 1) the landlord returns the cheque and 2) i provide a letter from the landlord saying my rent has not been in arrears.

 

I've replied saying landlord won't help and make a statement that rent is not in arrears and explained why. And sent them one of the threatening letters from MBNA to support the fact I had used credit! I also said I didn't think it reasonable that It should also depend on the landlord returning the cheque as that is out of my control.

 

I also read that the first payment should be sent to me to pass on to the landlord but they addressed it to them.

 

If they say no how can I progress it?

 

If the landlord was helpful it would be easy. I undertand why HB would like the first cheque back - but they could always stop it.

 

 

NB. the HB people have been quite good so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

I am a landlady and have in the past had tenants who have been on HB.

 

Normally when you fill in the application form for HB there is a box for you to tick to state weather you want the HB paying to you or to be paid direct to your landlord. The HB Dept then follow your instuctions.

 

The HB Dept will know if the cheque has been cashed and if not can put a stop on it of you ask them to. Also if your landlord has cashed the cheque and shouldn't have then the HB Dept can either chase the payment from him or reduce what he owes them from any future payments they make to him on your behalf.

 

If the HB Dept are being helpful like you say and the landlord is being awkward then ask the HB Dept to write to the Landlord on your behalf asking for the info that they require. At the end of the day if your Landlord wants his rent then he should do as they ask.

 

Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With it being a new claim (I'm guessing this from it being a first payment) are you not on Local Housing Allowance rather than HB? Any new claim since April 2008 which is made to a private LL should be on LHA.

 

If this is the case unless you are counted as 'vulnerable' payment will always be made to yourself, LL can apply to have it paid directly to them as long as you are 8 weeks in arrears.

HB claimants havent been able to request the payment is made direct to the landlord for quite some time.

 

Peeps may be able to give more help if its known whether you are on HB or LHA

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...