Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

If OC agree F&F with debitor, do they still get tax breaks they would had debt been sold to DCA?


Recommended Posts

This has been skimmed over a few times and Ive still not found a definate answer anywhere.

 

Does the Original Creditor get the same tax breaks from the government for passing on the debt in F&F settlement to the debitor, as they would do if they sold it on to a DCA for the same amount?

 

I feel its pretty important, especially given the fact that most of our debts are going to be sold on for 5-10p in the £1 and if its of no benefit to the OC to sell to the DCA over the debitor, surely it makes better 'moral' sense (if they have any) to offer the same deal to the person in debt.

 

I know many suggest that making offers of 5-10% would be a max if there is no Credit Agreement produced, but given that the likes of BC are stating that dodgy T&C's are essentially a response to a CCA request, surely selling to the debitor in an attempt to help them resolve their current financial problems is the right and responsible way to go.

 

Also having read alot recently about F&F offers, is anyone actually getting the OC to agree to such low amounts as 5-10%? The lowest I have read about being accepted has been 15%, but thats only recently. Just wondering if anyone has, could they pass on some tactics about how things played out in getting to that stage.

 

Our own debts are pretty dire, but I know for sure we could get 5-10% together from family at a push, and failing all other avenues such as the CCA/ CPR route, at least that could be them all of our backs and being able to start afresh once again.

 

Ideas on this one folks would be great, thanks. Im going to bed now x.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I see it, they can enter whatever notional loss they have made into their accounts and therefore set that against profits.

 

Whatever money the do get in, (from a DCA of from a F&F), contributes towards their balance sheet and is therefore subject to taxation. Only difference I can see is the ammount.

 

It would be in their interest to recover as much as possible; can't see it matters where it comes form. A larger figure would reduce the tax they can claim back but you don't make a profit from posting losses.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks David,

 

So it makes as much sense for them to accept 5% from us as it would to accept it from a DCA?

 

Should our MP's not be lobbying in parlament to ensure these banks offer us the same options as these DCA lowlife?

 

More thoughts on this appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt it, if you look at it another way if a debtor knew at the end of the day that they could in effect buy their own debt at a fraction of its value it would hardly encourage anyone to actually pay any creditor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what benefit do the Creditors get to writing the debt off to any debtor at between 5-20% of the value, when they could get 3-10% from a DCA and the rest in Tax benefits?

 

Getting caught up in this now - having read my post about the parliament lobbying, it does sound stupid! Why would they do that if it makes it that obvious!

 

But they do write the debts off at low levels to ordinary people in F&F's, so it must be of equal benefit to them to do this, as to sell to the DCA, otherwise they wouldnt do it. They have no love for us good folk after all!

Edited by meerkatsmimm
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...