KAZZAW v Lloyds Asset Card - EVERYONE READ post 15 & post 219 !!!!!!

[photoman]

Excellent well done -

 

Could this somehow be put in front of judges as a suggested order to speed process kind of like standard disclosure

 

Hurrahh 4 Kazzaw

 

I like this idea !!??

Could it be incorporated somehow into a draft of proposed directions in your AQ

 

ANY MODS OUT THERE, WITH ANY IDEAS ??

[photoman]

Excellent

 

If we could have the name of the judge and claim reference it would also be useful for those who have claims ongoing since they could reference the specific claim/court/judge when corresponding with their own court.

 

I'm not certain courts like to follow suit, but its often the case that once one professional does something, if its good and works, the rest follow on.

 

Glenn

 

Anyway that this would be possible? Understandably you would wish to retain anonymity, and ensure posting such would not prejudice your case.

Perhaps PM one of the Moderators for advice on this.

It would be really great, and very powerful info, if we could all get this info.

[photoman]

L O L..........................damn..............I should have waited for interest rates to go up before putting in a claim at current contractual !!!

 

On a more serious note, I for one will be making sure my own claim is more watertight than a ducks backside!

[photoman]

In keeping with your point tamadus.

Should any of the Banks decide they wish to defend a high profile case, on the grounds that their charges are justified, this would require them to provide evidence to that effect at the highest rate they could somehow justify.

In a highly competitive market, this would instantly put them at a huge dis-advantage compared to all their competitors.........who would then launch campaigns to encourage customers to bank with them for a better deal. Commercial suicide.

[photoman]

A word of advice, from my own experince of Lloyds people need to be aware that they are not to be trusted. I received a written offer from their solicitors offerring to settle my claim which they reneged on after I had accepted it and had cancelled the hearing. Leaving me without a court hearing and money. So I'd keep any case involving Lloyds running untill you get cleared funds.

 

Surely if it was a written offer, you have some evidence to use and take some further action to ensure offer is fulfilled ?

[photoman]

PHotoman, it doesn't matter what they wrote since the defendant cancelled the claim, breach of promise isn't an offence as far as I'm aware.

 

It is a golden rule that you don't cancel the claim until you have cleared funds in your account. I am surprised that the court didn't make sure, not that i think its their job, simply that every time i have been in that situation the court have asked have you got cleared funds let us know when you have.

 

You always tell the defendant you want the money within 7 days if you don't get it you carry on with your action.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

 

Agreed, "It aint over till the fat lady sings" !!!

Only fulfil any agreement on your behalf to to end an action once you see those pound signs as cleared funds actually in your account, and that is the way i would play things, and hopefully all on this site would do same.

 

Maybe this advice should be posted in the FAQ's or a big highlited sticky somewhere ??

[photoman]

A word of advice, from my own experince of Lloyds people need to be aware that they are not to be trusted. I received a written offer from their solicitors offerring to settle my claim which they reneged on after I had accepted it and had cancelled the hearing. Leaving me without a court hearing and money. So I'd keep any case involving Lloyds running untill you get cleared funds.

Judging by the original post, it appears that the offer from the Solicitors was actually written, thus a formal offer that must be honoured. If this is the case I don't see any problem getting a court to enforce this ?