Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
    • no you can email it dont worry about that. take out the index of statement of truth, just not needed
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help - fixed sum credit cca prescribed terms


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5578 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am no lawyer and may be wrong here, could someone on the site team perhaps look into this?

Have been looking at the 1983 consumer credit (agreement) regulations

found here -

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/57-statutes/176-consumer-credit-act-1974-and-related-regulations-.html

 

After reading the following much quoted post, I thought the interest rate did not constitute one of the prescribed terms for fixed sum credit (most loans) credit agreements:

 

"The Prescribed Terms are these

A Amount of credit

A term stating the amount of credit

B Repayments

A term stating how the debtor is to discharge his obligations under the agreement to make the repayments, which may be expressed by reference to a combination of any of the following-

(a) Number of repayments;

(b) Amount of repayments;

© Frequency and timing of repayments;

(d) Dates of repayments;

(e) The manner in which any of the above may be determined; or in any other way, and any power of the creditor to vary what is payable.

C Rate of interest

A term stating the rate of interest to be applied to the credit issued under the agreement

D Credit limit

This may be a term or the manner in which it will be determined or that there is no credit limit

For a fixed Sum Credit Agreement

A and B apply"

Reading through the 1983 credit agreement regs, I noticed paragraph 9 of Schedule 1:

"Total charge for credit, rate of interest, etc.

9. Agreements for fixed-sum credit:

(1) The total charge for credit, with a list of its

constituent parts.

(2) The rate of interest on the credit to be

provided under the agreement or, where more

than one such rate applies, all the rates in all

cases quoted on a per annum basis with details of

when each rate applies

(3) A statement explaining how and when

interest charges are calculated and applied under

the agreement."

could someone who has an understanding of the cca 1974 and associated regulations please confirm whether the interest rate is part of the prescribed terms for fixed sum credit?

Edited by retrospect
seperated quotes from my text
Link to post
Share on other sites

Schedule 1 of the regulations document is entitled

INFORMATION TO BE CONTAINED IN DOCUMENTS EMBODYING REGULATED CONSUMER CREDIT AGREEMENTS OTHER THAN MODIFYING AGREEMENTS

it seems that if interest rate is a prescribed term, it is not for all fixed sum credit agreements, as there are stated exceptions in the regulations. The full paragraph 9 of Schedule 1 reads:

 

9. Agreements for fixed-sum credit except

agreements--

(a) which do not specify either the intervals

between repayments or the amounts of repayments

or both the intervals and the amounts;

(b) under which the total amount payable by the

debtor to discharge his indebtedness in respect of

the amount of credit provided may vary according

to any formula specified in the agreement having

effect by reference to movements in the level of

any index or to any other factor;

© which provide for a variation of, or permit

the creditor to vary, (whether or not by reference to

any index) the amount or rate of any item included

in the total charge for credit after the relevant date;

or

(d) under which the total amount payable by the

debtor is not greater than the total cash price

referred to in paragraph 4.

 

(1) The total charge for credit, with a list of its

constituent parts.

(2) The rate of interest on the credit to be

provided under the agreement or, where more

than one such rate applies, all the rates in all

cases quoted on a per annum basis with details of

when each rate applies

(3) A statement explaining how and when

interest charges are calculated and applied under

the agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks 42man, will do as advised. would be interested in your opinion too if you are up for having a quick look at the regs - let's hope that the interest rate is one of the prescribed terms - i feel everyone should have the right to see something as important as the interest rate when signing up for a debt.

I'm hoping to clear my debts with full and final settlements out of court, and dodgy credit agreements can put a debtor in a stronger position when making offers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI

Yes it is a bit of a maze this one.

 

The agreement regulations scedule six ay that the prescribed term for interst applies to fixed sum credit agrements that fall with in the exeptions

in sechedule 1 a/b/c these are not the usual form of a conventional fixed sum agrement as usually the repayment are specified etc .

So it means that the interst is not prescribed term.

 

IN the earlier 1983/1553 regulations the interst was not mentioned at all in a conventional agreement so was not even required to be on the agreement at all.

The 2005/1492 ammende that and from August 2005 the interst was required to be on the agreement ona fixed sum, however the prescribed terms where not ammended by the 1482 so section six still refferd to the exculsions in 9 a/b/c so it never became a prescribed term.

 

Hope that helps

 

Peter

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI

Yes it is a bit of a maze this one.

 

The agreement regulations scedule six ay that the prescribed term for interst applies to fixed sum credit agrements that fall with in the exeptions

in sechedule 1 a/b/c these are not the usual form of a conventional fixed sum agrement as usually the repayment are specified etc .

So it means that the interst is not prescribed term.

 

IN the earlier 1983/1553 regulations the interst was not mentioned at all in a conventional agreement so was not even required to be on the agreement at all.

The 2005/1492 ammende that and from August 2005 the interst was required to be on the agreement ona fixed sum, however the prescribed terms where not ammended by the 1482 so section six still refferd to the exculsions in 9 a/b/c so it never became a prescribed term.

 

Hope that helps

 

Peter

 

Ok, Im easily confused by the laws and regs, thank you for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...