Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • you never use or give an email  2nd class stamp with free proof of posting from any po counter dx
    • Much appreciated for the ammendment. The snottier the better right!   What I am assuming is that this response is to be posted to Gladstones? However, I am seeing some users sending this as an email instead, which is a little confusing.  If we're happy with this response, what would you suggest is the best way to send it over to them (post/email), and is there anything additional I could include (if necessary)?  Thanks again! 
    • Hi I've read through other threads to better inform me of the process from here onwards. When I put in the MoneyClaim it gave me a claim number and it currently says to wait for the defendant to respond, they have until 7 August.   It seems their most likely action is to extend that a further 14 days to about 21 August - this hasn't happened yet, of course, as it is only 27 July but I'm anticipating that may be the case. when the expected defence action is taken by EVRi I will need to submit DQ with these responses A1 - no mediation B - my contact details C1 - yes to the small claims track D1 - No.  If No please state why.  I believe the defence will provide some rebuttal to the particulars of claim and so I need to include details as to why the claim requires a hearing.  Is there some certain templated text I can include here or will it vary depending on what the defendant comes back with? I see on the form it mentions the following: Relevant reasons include that there are factual disputes which will need the judge to hear from witnesses directly or the issues are so complex they need to be argued orally.  Hoping to reach out to see what may be the most effective statements for D1 reasoning. E1-5 are pretty straightforward. I want to get ahead of things and be ready to take the next step so I appreciate what advice you may have about the DQ.   Thanks!  
    • Rachel Reeves is set to reveal a public finances shortfall of billions on pounds after a snap audit.View the full article
    • Hi What they have asked in what you have highlighted isn't unusual at all as Councils have numerous different departments that deal with specific different areas within that council. So if what you are asking in your DSAR is say specific to Housing Benefit, Council Tax Benefit, Planning Permission etc then just let them know that specific area. On the other hand if you want every bit of DATA they hold on you then simply tell then ALL DATA they hold on you it's them up to then to go through all depts to check for it. 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Haringey PCN/Equita


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5581 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I hope someone will be able to give me some urgent advice, however Im a bit unclear about the dates/times as I have recently moved and cannot find previous paperwork.

 

Up until Nov 2007 I worked for Haringey Council, and picked up a number of Parking tickets throughout my 4 years doung home visits etc, many I left until the bailiffs clamped my car and I have paid £100's of pounds in fees.

 

Around mid 2008 I received a letter from Haringey Parking stating that they have incresed the charge to £80 (I think) as I had failed to pay a PCN. I was pretty sure that I had no outstanding tickets and when I checked the date of the alledged offence it was approx 12 months before the letter had been sent to me. Now from my experience of Councils and Parking tickets I know that they do not wait a year to write to you and increase the fee, so I wrote back to them challanging the ticket, explained that I had not received a ticket on my car and the PCN was actually dated a year ago, please could they send me evidence that they had issues the ticket and wrote letters to inform me that they were increasing the charges etc etc.

I did not receive a response and thought that they had not bothered/assigned it to the bin/realised their mistake etc etc.

 

Wrong, they passed the ticket to Equita who have wrote to me about 6 times in 2 weeks, threatening removal of my goods, fine is now at £182.73

They applied for a Warrant of Exection at TEC at Northampton CC.

I called them today and they said that they would continue to remove goods for their payment.

I guess my disagreement is with Haringey, and the Equita wolves will continue to call at the door until they are called off!!

Can anyone help me with advice or a template etc

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

If Equita know your car registration do not park it anywhere near your house as they may seize it. Do not answer the door to anyone, if you have to answer the door, make sure you have a security chain on. If the baillif tries to force the door open with his foot, then hit it with an instument (that fell off the shelf). If he forces the door then that is breaking and entering.

 

I was a certificated bailiff and was often reffered to as the nicest bailiff in Britain. I believed there are two sides to every story and whatever the outcome always got my fee. I also had a run in with JBW (see the director of that company on the BBC programme 'Beat the Bailiffs' ), After a while they gave up as I was never at home, and my neighbours never advised that I lived at the address. That said, on the two occasions that I have had a problem with a council, I have alway's proved that they were in the wrong.

 

I am of the belief that Equita do not turn up but the majority of the cases are for paperwork only. The reason that I say this is that my address is a secure property. After trawling through four weeks of cctv footage I have only noted the postman, charity clothes collector, neighbour and free paper person delivering. I also have three eagle eyed neighbours who have not seen a visitor to the address.

 

In conclusion, If Equita claim to have visited your address ask them to confirm the date and time of vists. I have got extremely stressed over these jumped up little ****es and it is not worth it,

 

 

If you need further help please feel free to contact me.

 

Kind regards,

Libra Carr

 

ps if this massage does not read right, i have broken both pairs of my glasses today.... sorry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick update as Iv spent the evening searching for letters etc and Iv found the original Charge certificate from Haringey which states that the PCN was issued in May 07 and thier Charge certificate was sent to me in August 07.

 

I didnt hear anymore until they wrote to me in August/Sept 2008, stating that I had an unpaid PCN, which I challanged and asked them to provide evidence. No response and passed to Equita.

 

Unless there is a timelimit for action to be taken by the council I guess Im stuffed and will have to liaise with the wolves of Equita.....:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stick your car on some private land and get some show plates on it - e.g. number plates that are not yours - give you more time incase they try to seize your vehicle.

 

Don't use false plates on the public road though - I know it goes without saying but I thought that I had better mention it.

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...