Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
    • no you can email it dont worry about that. take out the index of statement of truth, just not needed
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cl Finance Again.. Quick Help Needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5592 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello I am new to forums, but need quick help, today I received a notice of issue of warrant of execution for the sum of £3564.63 apparently owing to a CL Finance - Problem WHO ARE THEY? Ihave never heard of them, certainly I have never done business with them, I need to apply for a stay of this execution until they provide some evidence, they have no phone number and cannot be contacted which I dont have time to do the letter was received this morning and states the money has to be paid before 8th of April, take away the weekend - leaves me 2 days to deal with it.

 

HELP SOMEONE PLEASE...................:-o

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK having checked out another thread about these people I can see the often act for HBOS, the only thing I had with them was a bank account, in 2005 I had a brain tumour and could'nt deal with them (could'nt pay money into my account) the money they say is owing to them is made up of bank charges put against me - I wrote to CL finance because last year they applied and got a charge against my house!! I told them I was claiming against HBOS but no reply - now they are doing this What can I do somebody please

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have telephoned the number of the baliff this morning - having had little sleep to be told he is on holiday this week!! I told them I dont have time to wait for him to come back and - I do not owe this company anything - guess what nothing can be done until monday, now I only have 1 day to do something - please someone which form do I complete to stop this I have a fax so could get it to them before the date mentioned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, guess there is no real help on this site - sorry but I have been trying for a reply which I needed urgently since yesterday, fortunately I appear to have sorted the matter out myself this morning!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pont...apologies for not spotting this....if the debt is made up entirely of charges, then you need to get the CCJ and charging order set aside....you must send a SAR (Subject Access Request) to the original creditor, unfortunately this will cost £10 (send recorded) there is a good sar to send here - http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/576-subject-access-request-debt-a-dca.html

 

And details here about how to set aside.. - Removal of CCJ's - Step by step guide to the process

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks,

 

I'm in court with HC+CL this week and I am looking for examples of vexatious litigation by them

 

For this, I include any of the following:

 

1) The infamous "we have gained judgment" (when they havent) letter - the more examples of this the better

 

2) Any examples of lack of compliance with court orders, for example -

 

a) failure by HC/CL to enter an AQ by the time stated by the court

 

b) failure to comply with disclosure where a court has ordered it

 

c) failure to show in court for hearing

 

3) any examples of their claims being struck out by the court for the above and other issues

 

4) any examples (I think this covers most people) where they started a court claim less than 10 days after the date of the first "we own this account" letter they sent you

 

 

If I can get as manay examples of this as possible I'm hoping to get a judge to consider a vexatious litigant order, preventing them from carrying on this farce against us and others

 

As you can see, I am a long term ember of CAG and I am sure many long term members would guarantee my authenticity

 

I make this point because if you are willing, I would require the details above, plus

 

i) the court the action took place at

 

ii) the claim number

 

If anyone knows of others that are not on this thread but have had the issues, could you please ask them to view this and consider replying?

 

 

I would ask that anyone who is prepared to pass details does so via PM

 

Thanks all

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...