Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thousands more passengers could face delays or cancellations after an arson attack on France's train network on Friday.View the full article
    • you never use or give an email  2nd class stamp with free proof of posting from any po counter dx
    • Much appreciated for the ammendment. The snottier the better right!   What I am assuming is that this response is to be posted to Gladstones? However, I am seeing some users sending this as an email instead, which is a little confusing.  If we're happy with this response, what would you suggest is the best way to send it over to them (post/email), and is there anything additional I could include (if necessary)?  Thanks again! 
    • Hi I've read through other threads to better inform me of the process from here onwards. When I put in the MoneyClaim it gave me a claim number and it currently says to wait for the defendant to respond, they have until 7 August.   It seems their most likely action is to extend that a further 14 days to about 21 August - this hasn't happened yet, of course, as it is only 27 July but I'm anticipating that may be the case. when the expected defence action is taken by EVRi I will need to submit DQ with these responses A1 - no mediation B - my contact details C1 - yes to the small claims track D1 - No.  If No please state why.  I believe the defence will provide some rebuttal to the particulars of claim and so I need to include details as to why the claim requires a hearing.  Is there some certain templated text I can include here or will it vary depending on what the defendant comes back with? I see on the form it mentions the following: Relevant reasons include that there are factual disputes which will need the judge to hear from witnesses directly or the issues are so complex they need to be argued orally.  Hoping to reach out to see what may be the most effective statements for D1 reasoning. E1-5 are pretty straightforward. I want to get ahead of things and be ready to take the next step so I appreciate what advice you may have about the DQ.   Thanks!  
    • Rachel Reeves is set to reveal a public finances shortfall of billions on pounds after a snap audit.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

SICK WITH WORRY, PLEASE HELP (Robinson Way)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5600 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all. Oh my god, im that sick with worry i dont know where to start!!!

 

I will try and cut the story a bit shorter....... Back in 2000 we took a loan out with secure homes. After a year or so we got into difficulties and came to an agreement with them that we would pay £25 per month. In 2002 we moved house and our payment book got mislaid. After numerous times of contacting them and no responses from them we gave up!! The debt was sold to a company called JB Debt and payments were made of £20 per month for around 2 years. All of a sudden we get a letter from a company called Robinson Way, chasing the same debt!! As i was confused by this, i cancelled the standing order with JB Debt and waited for them to contact me. Eventually they did and said they were collecting the payments on behalf of Robinson Way. I told JB Debt i wanted something in writing clarifying who owned the debt as i did not want to end up paying 2 companies for the same thing.

 

Eventually, I received more letters from Robinson Way and i sent one of your templates requesting a copy of the CCA, which i recieved about 4 months later. I then wrote again by recorded delivery asking for a breakdown of the payments already made during the previous 2 years, but i heard nothing back. I then receive a letter saying they accept my offer of payment of £1 per month, but i had never offered this!!!! I wrote again asking for a breakdown of payments already made, but again, heard nothing back.

 

Then in January this year, i received a court letter/form. I completed it and enclosed a complete breakdown of my incomings/outgoings which left me £90 a month, and i offered them £25 a month. I also enclosed a letter telling them of the numerous attempts i had made to contact robinson way, but wasnt getting any responses. I sent the letter back on 21st January, but sent it direct to Robinson Ways acting solicitors. I heard nothing back from them until today!!

 

I am now sick to the bottom of my stomach with worry, because this court letter i have received today, states that Robinson Way have objected to my payment offer, and the court has decided that i must pay £248.33 per month starting from 25th April. HOW am i supposed to pay this when i am a single parent with 2 kids, and am only left with £90 a month after everything is paid?

 

Please can someone advise as i am beside myself with worry like you wouldn't believe!!!

 

Thankyou

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was the agreement you received enforceable. You need to get in contact with the court immediately by recorded delivery and explain your situation. Stating that there must be some mistake and you would like to have a copy of all the paperwork the decision was based on as you have NO disposable income being a VULNERABLE single mother on a low income. They can not ask you to pay more than you have available. With two kids I am sure you could get your disposable income down to zero so that a token offer of £1 would probably be accepted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also copy your post in to the Legal Issues section due to the urgent nature of your query and that the court is already involved. More knowledgeable CAGers monitor the Legal issues section so you will also probably get better advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think you would be advised to copy up what the court has sent you and the CCA reply, minus any personal details, opening a photobucket account (free) is favourite then u can upload the images or simply copy them verbatum if its easier.

is it a judgement for the claimant?

bear in mind that no court will make u pay more than u can afford so hold off on the panic front if u can, easier said than done of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...