Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for taking your time and helping me on this. Would you recommend I also send a letter tomorrow to both BMW and Motonovo?
    • she and  johnson need to be kicked off the taxpayers credit card - for starters I'm certain there is cause - taking up 'jobs' when they shouldn't, bringing the nation into disrepute with their antics .. I'm sure it would be a very popular act from a new labour guv
    • Please have a look at this draft letter. It is modelled on yours but I have cut out a load of the unnecessary information. Also, the responsibility lies with the finance company because the vehicle was brought on hire purchase. You send it to them and a copy to big motoring world.   Let us know if there's anything that you disagree with, which is wrong, which you think should be added
    • According to Alastair Campbell on Twitter, anti-Le Pen parties are pointing to RN's fiscal policies and saying they'll cause a 'Truss-style market meltdown'. Liz Truss charged taxpayers for Amazon Prime subscription - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK The subscription costing £95 gives the ex-PM free shipping from the retail giant, as well as the ability to stream films and TV shows such as My Fault...  
    • Thank-you @BankFodder, your statement is a correct understanding of my position and I agree, it is actually really what I was looking for in starting this thread, as I too believed that the maximum I could claim for is that which I sold it for, even though this was substantially below market value at the time. And so, this sold value is what I shall be claiming for + the other expenses. @dx100uk I get your point, but this is just not what I want to expose myself to. Unfortunately I was one of the unlucky ones to have my details stolen in the Peoples Energy hack, and in 2020 I discovered that those details had been used to take out car insurance, and that the insured was then involved in a collision and my details were dragged through the mud. Despite Aviva cancelling the claim and treating as though it never were, even though I have the letters from them to say that they have removed this claim from the insurance database, I still get refused insurance and credit products to this day until I send across the letter from Aviva which explains that I was a victim of fraud. So you'll forgive me for not jumping up and uploading my data to a server utility for which I have no control over its retention policy, or where the server is located globally, its legal jurisdiction, or its security protocols.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MBNA..i need help


nancy D
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5268 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm pretty sure that the OC has to notify you if the debt has been sold. and to whom. The recipient must then contact ou to advise that they have been assigned the debt etc etc

 

they most def do, refer back to post 57.

but its irrelevant as 42man states.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

To be fair, your circumstances, at least until recently, were very similar to mine so I am serving self interest by staying up with your situation.

 

At the same time, the more we help each other the better prepared we both will be and the interjections from more knowledgeable Caggers are a great help.

 

Hopefully, we will both get through all this and be able to sleep at night whilst the trauma continues.

 

If I can help in any way, shout up and I/we will be here to support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok i have sent everything now. Do i just wait???

 

Everything?

 

What did you send?

 

You need to submit the AOS, then enter a defence within the 23 days before the final date.

 

Did you submit a defence already? It just needs to be a summary of your arguements at this stage, then you will need to prepare a more detailed defence for the hearing, if it gets that far.

 

Personally, I would go for having the action struck if they cannot produce an agreement but that is further along.

 

At this point you should have sent the AOS, A SAR request, a CPR 31.14 or CPR 18 request (probably the latter) and entered a defence into MCOL.

 

Then you can sit and wait as the court will confirm that a defence has been entered and allocate the case to the court system. MCOL is somewhat limited in its application so once you defend, MCOL cannot handle this so it goes into the court system. Northampton will contact you to tell you which court etc and a hearing date.

 

If you have not received all of the information you have requested, then you will need to have proceedings stayed awaiting information from the claimant or their representative.

 

I think this is complete, wiser minds will put you straight if I have missed anything.

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi nancy,

as Stubie says can u post up what u sent under CPR18, in what timeframe did u seek a reply?

u have done the AOS, so when is ur defence due in (33 days after the date on the claim form)?

i wouldnt put your defence in just yet if time permits, in case u get smth back from the CPR18 rqst.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have submitted AOS online, I have sent subject access request to MBNA and also Requested the information from the solicitor within 7days. I don't know were to start in my defense it is due by the 2nd of October. Stubie i have not entered a defence into MCOL and don't really undertstand???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

 

You submit your defence in the same way.

 

As r&b says, leave it a while and see what you get back from the sols as this will influence what you put.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so i leave it at the moment and don't do anything until i get a response from the solicitors??? I am sorry to ask so many questions, I am not very clued up on anything like this and would not have got this far if it hadn't been for everyone's help on here

Link to post
Share on other sites

R&B the 28th August

 

so your defence has to be in by Wed 30th Sep (if poss, couple days b4 to be safe).

Ok so i leave it at the moment and don't do anything until i get a response from the solicitors??? I am sorry to ask so many questions, I am not very clued up on anything like this and would not have got this far if it hadn't been for everyone's help on here

 

most of us had no clue before finding this site nancy. i would have a look around and find a holding/embarrassed defence that fits your situation (most will) just in case you get nth back from them, just so u are prepared. also keep looking for and reading threads that are congruent with your situation, its amazing what u will pick up.

couple of useful links for speedy reference:

 

Consumer Credit Act 1974:

Results within Legislation - Statute Law Database

 

Civil Procedure Rules:

CPR - Rules and Directions - Ministry of Justice

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

 

I have had no reply from MBNA or solicitors so looks like i will need to put forward a holding/ embarrassed defence. It is also showing that the letter to the solicitors has either been declined as it showing as undelivered. I will need to send this again. I am looking at threads now but any input would be greatly appreciated.

 

Many Thanks

Nancy D x

Link to post
Share on other sites

HELP!!

 

I received a letter from MBNA today saying:

 

Thank you for your request to be provided with personal data pursuant to the data protection Act 1998.

 

For security reasons we require you to provide a form of positive identification (an example of acceptable identification would be a copy of a driving license or passport which includes the main cardholders signature). Although statement information has been sent to you at your address a current postal address is not adequate form of identification. Due to the amount of personal information MBNA will be sending in the Subject Access Request, including bank details, security information, places of birth and dates of birth, we would require extra identification from customers.

 

END

 

Has anyone else come across this or is it a ploy to get my signature????

Link to post
Share on other sites

nancy its a common ruse. reply stating that they have seen fit to send sensitive documents including a court claim to u at that address so u see no grounds for them disputing your identity. u could always send a diff signature from normal as a gesture of goodwill if u so choose. also tell them that the 40 day time limit began on their receipt of ur original request not from when they decided u were who u said u were.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have always deliberately used an altered signature in the hope they would use it but no luck so far. This didn't get noticed by any CCC or the banks as I sent cheques with the same altered signature. I use my normal signature on everything else so easy to prove if they did use it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks.. i will reply r&b and thanks for the signature tips lol!!!

 

 

I have also come up a with an embarrassed defense after looking through different threads. Would this be any good???

 

1. The Claimant has failed to supply a credit agreement.

 

2. No documents supporting the claims in the particulars have been offered which the defendant needs to establish what agreement it is that this action is based upon

 

3. Without clarification of the claimants claim, the defendant is extremely disadvantaged and the claimant’s claim appears without merit

 

4.Further to above the defendant is unable to plead effectively or at all. The defendant is embarrassed.

 

 

 

 

 

Any input would be greatly appreciated as i will need to send this ASAP!!

 

Edited by nancy D
Link to post
Share on other sites

u cud use most of this from nicklea/PT2537, amend to suit:

The Consumer Forums - View Single Post - Luxx -v- RBOS **Partial Victory**

 

final day is wed 30th sep isnt it? u can do it online

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

Hi Everyone,

Sorry i have not been on i have had a poorly little girl who is a lot better now.

 

Anyway Update:

 

I have only now received information one was a letter from MBNA solicitors as follows:

 

We refer to your De fence filed at court and dated 30th September 2009.

 

Our client is anxious to avoid costs of proceeding to trial which would be substantial and would be the responsibility of the unsuccessful party at the final hearing.

 

With this in mind our client would like to try and agree terms of settlement with you in order to minimize costs. with this in mind we enclose copies of all documents upon which we would intend to rely, these are as follows:

 

1. Copy Default Notice dated 2009

2. Current version of Agreement /terms and conditions

3. Statements of account from August 2006 to July 2009 which demonstrate how the default balance claimed of £14000 has been calculated.

 

Should you wish to negotiate terms of settlement with our client we must hear from you with in 7days failing which the proceedings will continue. We have in mind either agreeing a reduced lump sum settlement to clear the account at a discounted rate or installment arrangement under a consent order facility which will enable you to avoid incurring a CCJ.

 

 

I also received a letter from my court as follows:

 

Tue 8th Dec

District Judge ***** sitting at *******considered the papers in the case and ordered that:

 

1) The action is stayed until Tuesday 19th Jan during which a period the parties will try to settle the matter or narrow the issues.

2)By 4pm on Tues 19th the Claimant shall notify the court in writing of the outcome of negotiations(without disclosing any matters remain subject to 'Without Prejudice' Terms) and what, If any, further directions are sought. Failure to comply with this direction or engage properly in negotiations may result in the application of sanctions. If settlement has been reached , the parties shall lodge a consent order signed by all of them.

 

3) Because this order has been made by the court without considering representations from the parties, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed. A party wishing to make an application must send or deliver the application to the court within 7days

 

so now i am stuck again does anyone know what i should offer MBNA??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wondered what had happened to you. Pleased things are better for you and you daughter now.

They were obviously confident of winning then! I think discontnuance by them is good, but I would wait for more knowledgeable opinion before celebrating yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...