Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5578 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there. I hope someone here can advise me.

 

I lost my mother last february and when I went to the funeral parlour I had to sign forms saying I would pay the balance of the funeral. I signed these because I supidly believed that there would not be much of an excess as there was only £200 left owing after my dad died (after the DHSS had given me the funeral grant) only when the grants came through I found that there was an excess of £1800. I am on income support and disability benefits and this amount was really unexpected. I offered to pay the funeral parlour £45 a month which they accepted and that would have been fine if I hadn't defaulted on the payments - which I know was my own fault.

 

Everything started getting on top of me, me and Mum were very very close, she had lived with me and her memories were everywhere and in the end I decided to move away from the area and the memories because I was slowly losing the plot. Along with this debt, me and my partner also owed £7000 to provident, £2000 to london scottish and about £1000 in other debts bringing our total debts to £11,500. Anyway, as I said, we decided to move. We sold practically everything we had and moved 300 miles away for a fresh start. It took everything we had. Leaving no money for debts, so we didn't tell any of them that we had moved.

 

The ends are only just meeting as it is so once we went on the electoral role some of these companies started finding us. We have managed to negotiate with provident and a couple of small ones, london scottish and the water board haven't found us yet, and nor have the funeral place.

 

However, we have had our mail redirected and yesterday I received a letter from the bailiffs saying they were going to our old address on the 11th of this month to seize goods for the debt (which is now £1614.34) Obvioulsy they won't get anything because the people there will be able to prove who they are, but it is only going to be a matter of time before they DO catch up with us as our new address. And I don't know what to do.

 

I don't know if I should write to the funeral directors with our new address and a pro-rata offer of payment as I have done with the others (and the pro-rata payment works out at just under £25 a month) or whether I should just sit back and wait for them to find us and hope they don't while I try and raise the money? I have no family or brothers and sisters to help share the cost and I have no savings or really any available funds. I can't get a loan because of all the debt I have left behind and I feel as though I am backed up into a corner.

 

All and any advice is welcomed. I have read up that bailiffs have to give you a weeks notice, and that you can remove items - not that I actually have enough stuff to cover the debt if they tok it anyway, but I am terrified they will take my washing machine which I need because I am disabled and can't get my stuff to the launderette like anyone else would - let alone afford to do so! I'm kinda stuck here so thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if nobody knows where you live right now, you can do some preparation.

 

Sell all your stuff to someone you trust, and get a receipt, doesn't matter what they give you for it; then they can write a letter lending all the items to you, and then if it's seized they can claim it back.

 

Do make sustainable offers to your creditors.

 

Do not open the door to anyone, do not talk on the phone to anyone, do everything in writing/email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

God that's clever! will that stand up in court? If I sold all my excess goods to my mate for a tenner??? And yes I would trust her with my life!

 

I am making offers I can just about afford, because this is in the long term in order to clear my debts. I see no point in offering stupidly large amounts that I cannot possible keep up the payments on.

 

I guess what bugs me most is that I had little choice but to sign the forms, what else can you do when its your mum? I am also very cross that my Mum made absolutely no provisions for this event.

 

Thanks for your advice so far.

 

Do I let them find me or do I make first contact?

Link to post
Share on other sites

God that's clever! will that stand up in court? If I sold all my excess goods to my mate for a tenner???

 

Well, that depends on your mate.

 

In the event of a bailiff gaining peaceful entry to your home, they would have the right to assume that all goods inside were the property of the debtor - you.

 

Your mate would have to provide you with a receipt for the goods, listing each item, and a letter explaining on what terms she was loaning you the items and when she would require their return.

 

The if a bailiff did manage to seize them/levy upon them, she could try sending them a statutory declaration (costs a fiver) with a covering email/letter claiming the goods back.

 

Or if that didn't work, she could make an Interpleader application to the court and ask the court to release them.

 

Of course, it's much better if the bailiff doesn't get in in the first place.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well yes, obviously that's better lol I've not actually got that much anyway, but the a lot of the jewellry I have was left to me by my mum and although its cash value is next to nothing, sentimentally its priceless. I also couldn't live without my washing machine. There's definitely not enough to cover the debt anyway - once you take into account what's the kids as they have some quite nice stuff. Hubby has an xbox and a lovely watch but thats about his lot and I have this laptop (which is archaic and would raise twenty quid if I was lucky lol) so there's not actually a lot to take.

 

They won't get in peacfully and if they break in they will have a hell of a shock cos they won't be leaving peacefully either!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...