Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I would confirm that anyway, as there is a separate sheet where I have to put in those details and my insurance number and driving licence number. That is on page 2 (page one is their allegations) then page three is a statement that you weren't the driver and space to give details who was driving. Page 4 is an empty sheet for a statement to explain the situation. So I will fill out my details as the driver on page 2, admitting I was driving at the time, and then attach my statement as above as a separate sheet. That should hopefully do it at this stage
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Seems OK, except that you must provide your details (as the driver). Include your name, address, DOB and driving licence number. This is to comply with s172 of the Road Traffic Act. Keep a copy and get a free Certificate of Posting from the Post Office.
    • Dear all, some information/advice required please.   I recently received a Further Steps Notice about a fine from 19/03/2018 which I knew nothing about. It was regarding a vehicle parked on the street without tax ( It was covered up and there because the only key to it had been stolen, I had been away from home  and I was having trouble getting a new key cut and coded to the vehicle )  I had not made a change of address to DVLA which would be why I knew nothing about the fine until receiving the final steps notice dated 29th April 2024 and giving me 10 working days to pay, although the notice did not arrive till May 9th 2024. I emailed the London Collection and Compliance Centre on May 13th 2024 asking for any information and they sent me a copy of the original fine. It is for  £390 back vehicle tax, £85 cost and £600 fine.  I now have received a Notice of Enforcement dated 7th June 2024 demanding payment ( total £1036)  or an arrangement by 6am 15th June ( tomorrow )  My question is is it tool late now to question the £600 fine part of the total amount to be paid ? That amount seems punitive.  Would making a statuary declaration regarding having no knowledge of the original court date apply ? And any other advice gratefully received. I am on Universal Credit and apparently they have already taken £177 via benefit reductions which I wasn’t aware of, but does make it seem strange that they were also unable to contact me.    Many thanks for any assistance 
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Can HALIFAX close a CC Account that I don't use ???


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5610 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My OH got a letter to say :-

 

IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING YOUR CREDIT CARD

 

In line with our commitment to responsible lending, we carry out regular account reviews to ensure that we continue to offer a suitable service to our customers. A recent review has highlighted to us that you no longer use your credit card. Therefore, as a responsible lender, we would like to tell you that we have reduced your current credit limit to 500.00 (from 8.5K) and your account will be closed.

 

These changes will be made in line with your current Terms and Conditions and you will not be able to reopen this account. We apologise for any inconvenience by our decision to close your account.

 

For security reasons please destroy your card by cutting it in two through the magnetic stripe at the back of your card. Please cancel any subscriptions or continuous payments you have linked to this account. Any spend made on your account until the closure date will be payable in full on the closure of your account.

 

Can they simply do this ??? The CC was at its max limit the year before and we paid it off in full and didn't use it again....is this legal....what about people who only have them for emergencies ?!?!

 

Any help much appreciated

 

Regards and thanks in advance :-?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They seem to be being so selective on credit cards, maybe they have checked to see if they have an agreement (and don't) !! I think they like people to 'use' their accounts on a regular basis !! I know of one person who paid their credit card bill twice, and the account was in a + balance, and they called him and told him off as the account wasn't being used properly !!! (despite the obvious mistake !!).....

 

They can close the account on notice, however, i'm sure you'll not want to deal with Halifax again....If they don't want your business then take it elsewhere......

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the T&C's of the contract allow for it, I would imagin yes.

 

Don't get this bit though:

 

Therefore, as a responsible lender, we would like to tell you that we have reduced your current credit limit to 500.00 (from 8.5K) and your account will be closed.

 

Can only think this allows for anything in the pipeline they are not aware of.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Dave don't really understand your post maybe I am being a bit dim !!

 

They stated they were reducing the credit limit to 500.00. Our original one when applying on line about 5 years ago was granted at 8.5K immediately. Why would they reduce it to 500.00 when the balance was zero anyhow then close it ???

 

Was thinking of sending a CCA to them to see if they have the original and if not making a claim on all the interest they have charged over the years when we were maxed up to the limit month on month....what do you think ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think you would get anywhere.

 

If they dont have a CCA then they could not enforce any debt you have with them but then the balance is 0

 

A judge is likely to say to you that as you have had the goods (which you aknowledge in the way that you paid off the balance) then you should pay for them.

 

I dont think you would be succesful in any case against them to get the interest back.

 

just my opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Dave don't really understand your post maybe I am being a bit dim !!

 

 

Is it Me?:eek:

 

The way I read our post i that they reduced your credit limit to £500 and closed the account. In effect then, they closed the account to new purchases.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a similar thing happen with MBNA.

 

I was always up to date with my payments and when I started to struggle a couple of years ago I not only paid the card off but mistakenly overpaid them by about £30.00 and then stopped using the card.

 

I had a letter saying that they would be closing my account and asked me to give them my Bank details so that they could repay me the balance.

As I've always been wary of giving details over the phone I asked for a cheque,which they refused to do until I made a formal complaint.

 

As 42man said,they do seem to like you to use the card,but at least that's one I don't have to worry about now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Halifax have recently closed my OHs CC account for the same reasons , I guessed at the time that they had checked a CRA and seen my name linked to hers and as my creditworthyness is shot thought it safer to have no dealings with either of us. My OH did have her MNBA CC account put on hold when they checked a CRA and found my name linked to hers I am sure that they wrote to her explaining just that. If you have any debt problems and your name is linked to your OHs then it may be affecting your OHs credit rating.

Sleepingdog.

Edited by sleepingdog
missed MBNA from sentance
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...