Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I think we normally recommend people to follow the upload link
    • I removed them as they have my email address on them, and so shall repost them once my Snagit scrolling capture thing starts working (needs reinstalling I think as it keeps falling over); they are an email that runs over two pages, so would be best suited to a scrolling capture. As for multi page formats, this is harder as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking
    • Oh that is very helpful, thanks a million for answering my query. Looking at the license right now. At the front it says the issue date is 2022 (that's when I swapped it), but at the back it says 2015 next to Category B. So, I'm definately at 12 points, right?  
    • The two PDF documents that you posted earlier are unavailable. I don't know why but maybe they are corrupt. I have deleted them Please will you post up again. Also please can you post multiple PDF documents in a single file multipage format, correct order right way round et cetera. Thank you  
    • The New Drivers Act sees a driver's licence revoked if he accrues six points within two years of becoming a qualified driver. If you passed your test in an EU country, then that is the date you became a "qualified driver" for the purposes of that Act.  For drivers who became qualified more than two years previously, if they accrue twelve or more points within a three year period they face a mandatory six month disqualification unless they can persuade the court that they or others will face "exceptional hardship" if they are banned.  In both cases, the dates of the offences are used to calculate the relevant period.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

walking possession note pushed through door


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5635 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya

 

I came home today from shopping to find that a bailiff had attended my property for a claim against a company i used to run. I am no longer the director of this company and i have no further connection with it - except that my home address is still on their books as the registered address for the company. The company is now no longer trading.

 

The bailiff apparently is acting on a high court writ from manchester county court, and as i wasnt there, obviously posted this walking possession agreement through my door.

 

It states that all goods within the property now belong to the bailiff and that i am to make no attempt to remove them. It also states that unless i pay the full sum due within 7 days, he will re attend the property to remove goods - and as he has a walking possession that will give him the right to enter the property.

 

It then goes on to state on page two that i am to list valuable items, and then post the agreement back, signed to their office.

 

This walking possession was also posted through the door WITHOUT an envelope so all and sundry could read it should they so wish.

 

Now, if this was a personal debt, i would tell them bullocks as i have not seen the bailiff, therefore he has not had entry and therefore a WPO does not apply - however, the fact that he is acting on a writ - does that change things?

 

Also, if he served the WPO through the leter box without ascertaining who lived there, let alone not putting the WPO in an envelope - does that invalidate his WPO as it was incorrectly served?

 

Any advice would be welcomed. I am not too worried if he does turn up to be honest as all goods within the building are personal, not business related therefore i will challenge anything he tries to take as it does not belong to the company, therefore he can not legally levy upon goods not owned by the debtor - if i remember correctly.

Meekle Vs CAPQuest (littlewoods) No CCA produced WON Total alledged debt written off

Link to post
Share on other sites

the fact that he is acting on a writ - does that change things?

 

I'm not 100% sure but I don't think so, and I suspect that he can't make a "global reference" to goods - there's case law I think that says a wpa with a global reference is invalid - just can't remember where it is.

 

Sorry, I know that's not much help right now when you're looking for a definite answer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DONT WRITE ANY BELONGS DOWN ON THE LIST AND SIGN IT

they will then say you have agreed to the items i would ring the court and compalin that he has stated in a letter he has a walk in possession from where? who signed it? whats listed

No he wants you to list your belongs then they will turn up and take everything away

get onto the courts ASAP

Regards DK

Please Tip My Scales if Info was Use full

Link to post
Share on other sites

the business was a limited company. thanks to the advice from Chris, it would appear that even though he has the right to focefull entry into a business property, he can only do so if it is obvious that he property is only used for business and has no residential attachment to it.

 

Now i know that some bailiff's are a bit.... challenged with their grey cells, but surely even this one would know that a 3 bed mid terrace property in the middle of a housing estate has residential accomodation and no some high fancy offices of a multinational... wouldnt he?

 

I assume that posted the WPO through the door unsealed, not even in an envelope and the general conduct of the bailiff is worth a complaint to the relevant authorities then?

Meekle Vs CAPQuest (littlewoods) No CCA produced WON Total alledged debt written off

Link to post
Share on other sites

absolutely, my strategy is to create a blizzard of mail at every and any opportunity - got to sound reasonable - but given average bailiff behaviour that shouldn't be too difficult.

 

At present my bailiffs are treating me very kindly, they quietly deliver letters every now and then so as not to disturb, just to let me know there's still a debt. I think they've all accepted that I won't pay any more than I am because I can't.

 

If it works for me, I know it can work for everyone else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...