Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Philips(Darlington) Adding Fees at Random


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5622 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

GlenW has already posted that their complaint has been received by the Court and that they are acting on it.

 

If there is anything else that you know of which GlenW needs to know, there is no reason why it can't be written here.

 

IF - and only IF - HMCS have made clear that contact numbers for staff who are PAID TO DEAL with complaints of this nature should never be made available to the very people who need to complain, then not only would we really need to raise the issue of why that is the case, but it would also bring into question the effectiveness of that provision, surely?

 

IF they have stated this, perhaps you could tell us where they have stated it - unless it's just an opinion about what some believe is not permitted.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I've just received this by email from the court:

 

Hello – I’ve now received a copy of the telephone transcript from Philips which I have attached for you to look at. I’ve also spoken to Philips but unfortunately as the transcripts do not actually confirm at any time that you stated you were ringing to pay the outstanding balance of £100.00, Philips are refusing to remove the additional charges.

 

 

 

Unfortunately in light of this information I have had no option but to remove the hold and instruct Philips to resume trying to recover the debt.

 

 

 

All I can suggest is that you make a formal complaint in writing to Philips and to the courts (the address below). I would also speak to the Community Legal Advice Team on 0845 3454345 (opt 5) and see if they can help you.

 

Obviously Philips have not sent the transcript of the call where I did offer to pay the £100 that I accept I owe.

 

When I last called the Community Legal Advice Team they merely suggested I contact the court.

 

I've written a letter of complaint to Philips, I've spoken to the Community Legal Advice Team and I've asked the court itself for help, what do I do now?

 

I have letters from Philips that prove they added fees to the account before the time limit they had set, surely they can't get away with this.

I take half a Viagra and drink a cup of hot chocolate every night before I go to bed.

 

The hot chocolate helps me sleep and the Viagra stops me rolling out of bed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

tomtubby has just helped me draft a superb letter of complaint that I have sent to the appropriate Contract Manager.

 

Thanks Sheila you are a star.

 

I'll keep you all posted on what happens next.

I take half a Viagra and drink a cup of hot chocolate every night before I go to bed.

 

The hot chocolate helps me sleep and the Viagra stops me rolling out of bed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I've just had a telephone call from the Contract Manager to tell me that he has instructed Philips to return the account to the court marked as paid. He also assured me that the only further correspondence I should receive from Philips would be confirmation that this account is closed.

 

Thanks again tomtubby.

I take half a Viagra and drink a cup of hot chocolate every night before I go to bed.

 

The hot chocolate helps me sleep and the Viagra stops me rolling out of bed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I would really appreciate the address for the contract manager for south yorkshire HMCS as I have had the same prob as Glen w, have complained to philips - fallen on deaf ears, they are not interested.

Briefly -

1.letter recieved on 07/10/08 from philips demanding £95 to be paid within 48 hours ( no date on letter ) .

2. Made an arrangment to pay by instalments next day on 08/10/08.

3. 13/10/08 - Visit from bailiff - why ? £100 charge . Total £195.

I really need to know who to complain to, despite numerous letters to philips all i recieve is a statement of the account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sarah,

 

I don't know who the Contract Manager for South Yorkshire is, but this is the email address for the gentleman I contacted, Paul.Skelton@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk, I think he is just for the North East.

 

I suggest you contact him and ask for the email address you need.

 

Good luck and don't give in.

I take half a Viagra and drink a cup of hot chocolate every night before I go to bed.

 

The hot chocolate helps me sleep and the Viagra stops me rolling out of bed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just had a telephone call from the Contract Manager to tell me that he has instructed Philips to return the account to the court marked as paid. He also assured me that the only further correspondence I should receive from Philips would be confirmation that this account is closed.

 

Thanks again tomtubby.

 

GLEN

 

I had missed this post. I am delighted. So there is one contract manager who is doing is good job!!

 

SARAH.

 

I am so disappointed that Philips appear to once again be doing the same as GLEN. I think the contract manager has changed but I will check and post back in a few hours with details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not sure which person is the correct one but here goes. The names are the Contract Managers at HMCS with responsibility for both Marston Group and Philips but PLEASE can anyone ensure that these names are ONLY applicable for complaints concerning outstanding MAGISTRATE COURT FINES. These people have nothing whatsoever to do with anything other than these debts which are criminal debts.

 

 

For the North West the name is:

 

Janet.Anderson@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk

 

 

For the Midlands you need:

 

Robin.Lovell@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk

 

If anyone has any problems getting a response please do post back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thank you so much glen and Tomtubby for the contact details.

 

The contracts manager contacted me and I sent her through all the details and the charges have been removed. She did actually say that Philips had removed them before she got involved ( I think this was because I sent philips an email stating I was going to contact the courts) .

Interstingly in the Interim I did contact ACEA ( Association of Civil Enforcment Agencies) who were'nt interested. So for anyone else battling these awful companies, the best action is to go to the courts and make them aware of these scandalous charges for sending out "invisible bailiffs".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which contract manager did you contact?

 

As many of you on here will know, there has been a tragic death of a pensioner who was very ill and who was taken to the cash point machine by a bailiff enforcing a Distress Warrant for an unpaid Magistrates Court Fine and there is an ongoing investigation by the Courts and the Contract Managers. This may be why your complaint has been quickly dealt with.

 

There is a post concerning this matter on the bailiff forum.

 

 

Well done. !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tomtubby

 

It could be why it was dealt with so quickly , It really does make you wonder what sort of people work for these private bailiff companies. I realise there is a need for bailiffs but I think they should be employed by the courts directly and not contracted out to private companies. I sent philips 7 letters questioning the charge and for an explanation, all i kept recieving was a statement of the account, they have no complaints procedure in place and are not adhering to the rules laid down by the MOJ. There is no way my daughter could have sorted this out without my help and armed with information from this forum I suceeded, so the message is if you think you have a case keep persevering. Thank goodness for this forum.

 

The lady I contacted was :email]sue.fawcus@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk[/email] This is the senior enforcement officer for south yorkshire

Edited by greenbee
Link to post
Share on other sites

GLEN

 

I had missed this post. I am delighted. So there is one contract manager who is doing is good job!!.

Yes, but I do believe mentioning your name in the letters, phone calls and emails helped. When I mentioned you, on the phone, I heard an audible groan, that sounded like, "Oh No!, this bloke is getting good advice and won't be fobbed off!".

 

Thanks again, you are a star!.

I take half a Viagra and drink a cup of hot chocolate every night before I go to bed.

 

The hot chocolate helps me sleep and the Viagra stops me rolling out of bed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...