Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok Thank you DX will do just that . will keep you up dated.
    • dispute it with whichever cra provider is now showing it. simply state the a/c is from 2015 and was defaulted (date) and should not have re appeared. probably getting ready to sell it on. dx
    • Hi Caught Shoplifting at John Lewis - Retail loss Prevention/Other shoplifting allegations. - Consumer Action Group Thanks a lot for commenting this experience of yours. I do understand this might be something that you are not willing to talk about anymore but the same exact scenario happened with me today at John Lewis. They took my name/ address/ a picture of me holding a signed banned letter. the only questions I've got are... will I be contacted by the police will this be recorded as police caution or criminal record?  I would really really appreciate if you could let me know how it went.  I am so so so ashamed of myself and am really making changes in my life I feel like I've lost myself for a period of my life but anyways it would be really great to hear back. Thanks 
    • I thought Delinquent ment "missing payments" its active so assumimg it can be seen ? also this is the only thing change on my credit file and that in its self being re added has dropped my credit score . the debt is SB and did drop off my credit file so how have or how can they re add it again ?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

UKPC battle reached debt collectors - desperate for advice PLEASE!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5737 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all.

 

I’ve been browsing this forum for quite some time now and I found it very helpful in dealing with my UKPC claim. Unfortunately, my case has now reached a letter from DEBT COLLECTORS who are saying that they will pass the matter to their solicitor with 7 days if I do not pay in full (now £135).

 

I still believe my case is unfair and I’m desperate for some help.

 

Basically, I turned into a parking to answer a mobile phone and stopped in a disabled bay, never left the car, never shut down the engine. I saw in the rear view mirror a UKPC parking attendant approaching and taking a photo of my car. He then asked me for a disabled badge, I apologised and drove off. He said OK and left.

 

Two weeks later – a £45 fine. Followed by a letter from me, then another one back saying that no matter what I say with no badge I’d have to pay. I answered with a second letter which followed by a £90 notice. In turn, I sent my final letter. All correspondence attached below.

 

What do I do now, when the case has been forwarded to the debt collectors???

 

Thank you in advance for your help

 

 

Taras

 

 

_______________________________________

 

My letters:

 

1.

 

Dear UKPC,

 

I write with attention to the above parking notice.

 

I see your charge as unlawful, unenforceable and I am not liable.

 

Any further communication from yourselves, other than notification of cancellation of the ticket and any purported charges, will be regarded as harassment, under The Administration of Justice Act 1970, and I will have no hesitation in taking the matter to local MP's, the DTI, BPA and the DVLA.

---------------------------------

 

2.

 

Further to the UKPC letter on 26.08.08, it has been advised by a third party involved in this matter to obtain the following documents from the UKPC in order to anticipate further actions:

 

  • A photographic evidence (copy) of the vehicle’s windscreen without a valid disabled permit on display.
  • A copy of a PCN ticket issued at the time of claimed offence.
  • Full name of the issuing UKPC officer.

Best Regards,

----------------------------------------

 

3.

 

 

I refer to previous correspondence on above mentioned dates.

 

 

I note that you refer to me as owner. I have acknowledged only that I am the keeper.

 

If your allegation is that I was the driver then please produce evidence of this to substantiate your claim. I have to advise you that the driver could have been any one of a number of people and I keep no records of who has driven the car on any given day.

 

I also note your comments about debt collectors. Given that this debt is in dispute I shall simply advise them that the debt is in dispute and they will have to refer back to you.

 

Finally, I do not feel that you are acting reasonably in this matter.

 

I have asked you to provide evidence to substantiate your claim against me and you have not done so. I feel that I have done all that I can to assist you. Unless you provide evidence to substantiate your claim against me I shall be unable to help you further in this matter.

 

This alleged debt therefore remains disputed by me. Save for supplying the evidence referred to above I must ask you to cease and desist correspondence with me.

 

Other than as described above, any further correspondence from you or any other party in relation to this matter may result in a complaint to the authorities under the Protection From Harassment Act 1997.

 

 

Yours faithfully

---------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

Please help me solve this problem...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all.

 

I’ve been browsing this forum for quite some time now and I found it very helpful in dealing with my UKPC claim. Unfortunately, my case has now reached a letter from DEBT COLLECTORS who are saying that they will pass the matter to their solicitor with 7 days if I do not pay in full (now £135).

 

 

There is nothing unusual in a PPC referring it to a debt collector (who is often just another person in their own office sitting at another desk).

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Unfortunately" for the PPC that is. It means they didn't land someone who is going to pay them. they have zero chance with this and they know it. that won't stop them send you more rubbish letters though. Never forget they play a percentage game. let them waste their time and money sending you letters, just keep them safe in the drawer and live your life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't be scared by the term 'debt collector'. Unless you've lost in court and still refuse to pay, they can do absolutely nothing. Seriously.

 

A debt collection agency is just a company like any other. If the letter was headed "Joe Bloggs Plumbers", would you be getting worried? All they do is send letters and very very occasionally knock on your door. That's the limit of their powers - they can knock on your door and ask for some money. You could either not answer, tell them to get lost or invite them in for tea and biscuits. They still couldn't do anything.

 

If anything, a debt collector getting involved is a good thing. If they had a case, they'd just go straight to court. As they don't, they just want to scare you into paying, and the 'debt collector' (cue lightning sound effects) is just the next step along the way before they give up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for a quick reply.

What should my actions be next? Debt collectors told me to respond within 7 days or….

Should I write back stating my reasons for unlawfulness of this claim again?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

they won't waster petrol coming round - they know they have NO POWERS AT ALL. Usual scare tactics, unlawful and probably illegal (can't say about the illegal part without seeing the paperwork but it is not unusual to see illegality)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...