Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Natwest Unfair Bank Charges


Daze
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5721 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A switch transaction via a solo card(NatWest are due to go to Visa debit card towards the end of next year) work the same as a cheque. They are valid for 6 months from the date of authorisation. I have never relied on a cash machine or a balance to tell me what I have to spend.

 

I had merely read up to the paragraph ending with the phrase "co-op barely seem interested in speaking to me about it." And then I read the rest of it which kinda said what I was about post. I agree with you about CHIP and PIN terminals but there are occasion where a transaction is not fully completed and therefore will debit the account at a later date. I think you need to start the process of reclaiming bank charges.

  • Haha 1

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is what I have read davethorp on MSE(i commented like a donkey without actually researching it). It would offer better protection because of the VISA element to it. Maestro offers very little protection to consumers.

They are not in breach of the Banking Code 5.5 which states:

5.5 Before we take interest or charges for standard account services from your current or savings account, we will give you at least 14 days' notice of how much we will take.

 

I think the OP got 2 maintenance charges which are pre advised plus 2 Guaranteed Card Payment Fees which would not be classed as "standard account services".

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave you have misread my post, Unauthorised borrowing ie Maintenance charges IS pre advised with any interest. But sudden charges ie Gauranteed Card Payment Fee is not pre advised.

 

 

EDIT: not sure what they are doing on the cards bit as articles I read suggested end of next year that they would be issued. When I know, I will give you a shout.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to be a pain, but whats the difference between reclaiming them, and them being refunded?

Being refunded means the bank will refund them, reclaiming them does not actually mean that they will refund them as the OFT test case is on going. Once the Test case is completed is when the bank may or may not refund charges based on the final decision

So NatWest have told me they're not prepared to budge on this, yet i can actually reclaim the charges?

Yes you can start the process. There is no moratorium on bank charges so the bank may still charge you during the process which can be added to any claim.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...