Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
    • Whilst trying to point score over Biden, Trump can't remember the name of his own doctor. Trump gets name of his doctor wrong as he challenges Biden to cognitive test | Donald Trump | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Gaffe came as 78-year-old Republican presidential candidate sought to bolster his support among Black and Latino voters in Michigan  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

"Match day" parking ticket


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5668 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently parked outside a friend's house in Islington on a Saturday morning for a few minutes and bought a ticket. Later in the day I returned and parked in the same bay but, as it was outside the normal hours (0830-1330), I didn't buy a ticket.

 

The sign said that, on match days, extra restrictions applied (1330-1630). There was, however, no indication that it was a match day (no signs on the street or attached to the usual lamppost notices).

 

I cannot seem to find much information about similar cases and was wondering if anyone had any thoughts/experience around this matter - your help would be greatly appreciated!

 

So far I haven't responded to the ticket and I'm considering my options. I would definitely like to fight it as I don't think it's unreasonable to ask how I was supposed to know the extra hours were in force (no quips about my lack of football knowledge please!).

:-x DB :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was this near the Emirates Stadium? I know someone recently didn't have much luck there after getting a ticket on matchday.

 

What does the signage look like exactly? And can we see the PCN? (minus personal details)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was on Halton Road (just past Highbury Corner), quite far from the stadium but I guess still within the catchment area for supporters.

 

The sign was just a standard parking sign with another one bolted on underneath with the generic match day information. It was definitely a permanent sign though and therefore nothing to distinguish this particular day.

 

With regards to the PCN, the "Contravention Code" was stated to be "05P - Parked after the expiry of paid for time" and allegedly occurred at 1530. I guess this was given as I still had the old ticket in the window (expired 1131), although I obviously wasn't parked there in between the two events.

 

I can try and scan it in tonight if I get a chance.

:-x DB :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't think off the top of my head how to work images without webspace. Someone should know.

 

Your ticket has been issued for the expiration of your pay and display. It has nothing to do with the match day times - that would be '01 Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah that's what I thought and I was going to protest that the ticket was an old one etc. but I didn't think that was a valid argument as they would then ask me to show proof I had a ticket for the period in question (at which point I would have to argue the match day thing anyway). Is any of this making sense/do I have any hope in fighting it?

:-x DB :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

need to see all of the PCN. It's a legal document. That said, I think current Islington ones are probably compliant.

-

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Islington info is as follows. They claim that signs were viewable on entrance to the controlled parking zone.

 

Match Day Parking

 

Yeah I noticed that too on the website. Went to have a look at the area again yesterday and found the signs as you turn into the street. Not very obvious but they are there I guess.

 

What are your thoughts about arguing about the error with the contravention?

:-x DB :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I noticed that too on the website. Went to have a look at the area again yesterday and found the signs as you turn into the street. Not very obvious but they are there I guess.

 

What are your thoughts about arguing about the error with the contravention?

 

It is the correct contravention as you were parked with an expired ticket I cannot see how you can argue you were not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is the correct contravention as you were parked with an expired ticket I cannot see how you can argue you were not?

 

Agree. Very difficult to argue since it is favourable to you: The alternative would have been £120-

-

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I'm not sure where I'm going with this one. I just thought there might be a chance I could argue that the expired ticket hadn't "expired" per se, but rather was an old one that was just left there and therefore the actual contravention was not having a ticket. Nice idea perhaps but probably not on to a winner there.

:-x DB :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Both contraventions are the same level of penalty.

 

Nope.

 

If 'time expired' equates to £80- - lower level penalty

 

then they are using a scale where higher level penalties i.e. 01 as you say - are £120-

 

You are welcome to check. try dfT operational guidance 'annexe' or London Councils who actually define the contraventions. the latter is a pig to find though.

Many Council sites also describe them. *

 

The choice of penalty scales is also defined but in each case the lower and higher amounts are specified.

-

Edited by Ting
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I'm not sure where I'm going with this one. I just thought there might be a chance I could argue that the expired ticket hadn't "expired" per se, but rather was an old one that was just left there and therefore the actual contravention was not having a ticket. Nice idea perhaps but probably not on to a winner there.

 

To be honest, I can't see you have any case whatsoever from what you say so far.

Not something I like to say - or do lightly - but at least you know where you stand.

-

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope.

 

If 'time expired' equates to £80- - lower level penalty

 

then they are using a scale where higher level penalties i.e. 01 as you say - are £120-

 

You are welcome to check. try dfT operational guidance 'annexe' or London Councils who actually define the contraventions. the latter is a pig to find though.

Many Council sites also describe them.

 

The choice of penalty scales is also defined but in each case the lower and higher amounts are specified

 

Expired tickets and 'no p&d' are always on the same scale regardless of which scale is used, unless in a permit bay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Expired tickets and 'no p&d' are always on the same scale regardless of which scale is used, unless in a permit bay.

 

Ah yes. i agree. It wasn't you who mentioned '01' but someone else.

There again, we don't know where he parked do we - or did I miss that too?

-

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Just a quick update on my case. I made formal representations against the PCN on receiving the Notice to Owner, those were rejected, so I appealed to PATAS. Islington didn't bother to produce a copy of the PCN apparently so the adjudicator threw it out. Shame, would have liked to know whether they would have held up my argument or not!

Never mind, good result. Thanks for all your help!

:-x DB :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...