Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MBNA - Interesting Phone Call


Jipdog7
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5732 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

As with many people MBNA have failed to provide me with the right stuff under a CCA request, they sent the usual copy of the application form from 2002 and current terms & conditons.

 

I wrote back telling them to get it right which is I assume why I got a call from them today. For a start I wasn't impressed as it was on my work number. The minute I knew it was a lady from there I admit I saw red. :mad:

 

I pointed out that I had requested everything to be via writing and got the usual "We are a phone bank only" response. Parried with the "I'm a letter only person" (thanks whomever came up with that one! ;)) which seemed to annoy her further.

 

Next salvo was that the account was in dispute as they hadn't fulfilled the CCA request to which she replied "we have provided you with all we need to" when pressured if that is the documentation they would rely on in court she told me that they wouldn't take me to court but it would go to "litigation" and they would get a charging order on my house.

 

She didn't sound impressed when I pointed out that in this country litigation means going to court and she'd have to do that to get any kind of order. In fact she was so unimpressed she put the phone down. :D

 

I feel another letter to MBNA coming on, pointing out the error of their ways. At least I know where I stand now, just need to get it in writing from them. Will also get a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) started to annoy them further.

 

Thanks to all on this site who have given me the confidence to fight back!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got home to find they'd sent me 3 letters, all dated the same day, one in a nice green envelope which makes a change.

 

In one letter they claim that they've been notified that I've moved address, obviously another ploy to get me to phone up and say "Oh no I haven't", they really do think we are stupid.

 

Had to laugh as two of the letters were signed by Martin Supple as Head of Customer Assistance and one by Matthew McGrath as Head of Customer Assistance - are they on a jobshare scheme??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had another call from them today and suceeded in getting the woman so annoyed that she slammed the phone down on me! :-D

 

She confirmed yet again that they would never take me to court then started threatening me with debt collectors, charging orders, terrible things on my credit file, never getting another job, bad hair days, plagues of frogs, etc.

 

One quote from her was "you think you know so much about your rights but you're wrong!" No dear, I think you're the one in the wrong!

 

A plus that I do have now is their fax number (she wanted me to re-send the "do not call me" letter) it's 01244 673091 if anyone wants to use it. :wink:

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...