Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

full hgv morph into provisional


WOOD73
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5740 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have today received a reply from them.

 

Dear Mr Wood

I refer to your recent query regarding your driving licence.

I have checked our records carefully but cannot confirm that you previously held full LGV entitlement. Before we can consider issuing you with that entitlement you will need to provide evidence of previously holding full LGV entitlement since 1st April 1986. Sufficient evidence would be, for example, a copy of a previous LGV licence or a letter from someone, preferably an employer, who can confirm seeing your most recent LGV licence, giving the class of vehicle that you were covered to drive and the dates shown on your most recent licence.

Any information that you can supply will be given urgent and sympathetic consideration.

Please note if your last licence expired before 1st April 1986, we would now be unable to renew it.

A pre-paid envelope is enclosed for your reply.

Yours sincerely

Michelle Small

 

 

 

 

problem is, I have been self employed for the last 4 years and my previous 3 employers have all gone bust!

any ideas, or am I stuffed on this one?

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Before we can consider issuing you with that entitlement you will need to provide evidence of previously holding full LGV entitlement since 1st April 1986"

could this be construed as an admission that their information is not correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It could be an admission that their methods of retaining data relating to test passes is not up to scratch, but it is also their usual tactic of putting the onus on you to prove you have passed the test. Given that the only proof that you get is the test pass certificate, which then has to be sent to DVLA, then that is pretty difficult.

 

That's why I would do a SAR under the Data Protection Act and find out exactly what information they hold on you. From the DVLA website:-

 

Release of information about yourself - Driver Register

Enquiries of the Driver Licence Record should be addressed to DCS (Data Subject Enquiries), D4, DVLA, Swansea SA6 7JL. You should give details of your address, driver number or full name and date of birth and reason for request. A fee of £5 is payable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just been in contact with them, and was told if I could get a letter from the employer I worked for 9 years ago, that would probably sort it.

she also confirmed when I mentioned that this wasnt an isolated case and happens all the time.

she said if I had a certificate I could send that in, what certificate that would be is beyond me, as I told her the test certificate was sent in years ago! she said she was just trying to help me, what a laugh!

funny really, they could accept a letter off a former employer, but I myself was until recently an employer, yet they cannot accept a letter off me.

s.a.r and more research I think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

right sent off sar, and wrote to them again explaining the difficulties in providing what they have asked for, I have also stated that since this is their cock up that it is up to them to find evidence that I did not hold the categories, and gave them 7 days to come up with the evidence or reinstate the categories.

that was 7 days ago and guess what, no reply at all!

can I complain about the speed (or lack of) with which they handle complaints? or is that just going too far?

I have also written to a few choice mp's that are meant to oversee this department.

Link to post
Share on other sites

another reply from michelle small today, basically the same rubbish I ve already had, telling me how she has investigated fully etc. but in the opening line she even spelt my name wrong!

 

I have mailed back asking for it to be escalated to a more senior member of staff.

i have asked by what right she call me a liar and that I am prepared to issue proceedings for defamation of character.

I have again mentioned the amount of other similar cases that have come to my attention, and asked why most should be drawn into an argument with a communist like department where you are guilty until proven innocent, while some just have there categories reinstated straight away.

 

still havent received sar.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If these cats are on your old license, then they must have had proof ie certificate etc at the time, and are they now saying they made a mistake by having those cats on there?

 

They have made a boob either way, they had the cert and added it or they didn't have the cert and still added it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

had a letter this morning, which basically says this is our final answer, we will not reinstate without evidence being provided, the dsa only hold records for 2 years, and that I should have informed them earlier.

what else can I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

had a letter this morning, which basically says this is our final answer, we will not reinstate without evidence being provided, the dsa only hold records for 2 years, and that I should have informed them earlier.

what else can I do?

 

 

Who gave you that response, is that as a result of going through the various stages of their complaints procedure?

Link to post
Share on other sites

had sar back, no record of test on it!

at my wits end with this, I think I should just admit defeat, so I am looking for a loan now to pay to retake the test(s), 4 of them in all, think of all those test fees.

 

I just dont know what else I can do, as I dont think they are going to budge.

If anyone has any more ideas, please let me know.

 

thanks for all the help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...